Suped

ReachMail vs Fraudmarc Community Edition

Choose ReachMail for integrated marketing with basic DMARC, or Fraudmarc Community Edition for free, self-hosted DMARC reporting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
ReachMail integrates DMARC management and reporting directly into its email marketing platform. While this offers convenience for users already relying on ReachMail for campaigns, its DMARC features are fairly standard. We found it provides basic summary reports and access to original DMARC documents, which is a good starting point for understanding your email authentication. However, it doesn't offer the deep analytical capabilities or advanced DMARC tools found in dedicated DMARC platforms.
The DMARC functionality in ReachMail is largely a supportive feature for its core marketing services, ensuring good deliverability for their own sending. This means you get SPF, DKIM, and DMARC protocols, but don't expect a granular view or sophisticated forensic reporting. It’s more about maintaining health for your email marketing than comprehensive DMARC enforcement across your entire domain ecosystem. You get basic DMARC protection and insight, tied to your chosen marketing plan.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) is a free, open-source DMARC reporting solution that primarily focuses on parsing DMARC aggregate reports. Its main feature is to help you analyze your DMARC data, allowing you to see who is sending email on your behalf and whether it's authenticating correctly. Because it's self-managed and open source, you have full control over the data and its presentation, assuming you have the technical skills to set it up and maintain it.
As a community edition, it lacks many of the advanced features present in commercial DMARC tools, such as forensic reports, active source identification, or automated configuration suggestions. It provides the raw tools for DMARC analysis, making it suitable for users who prefer to build and customize their monitoring infrastructure from the ground up. It’s a robust engine for DMARC reporting, but it requires a lot of manual effort to get the most out of it, including managing your own infrastructure.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
ReachMail offers a relatively straightforward user experience, especially for those already familiar with email marketing platforms. The DMARC features are integrated into the broader interface, making them accessible but not necessarily prominent. We found the dashboard to be intuitive for managing email campaigns, and the DMARC reports, while basic, are presented clearly enough for quick overviews. It is designed for marketers, so technical DMARC jargon is minimized.
However, if you're solely looking for a dedicated DMARC monitoring tool, the broader marketing suite can feel a bit overwhelming, as DMARC is just one small piece of a much larger puzzle. It's easy to get started with DMARC for a single domain if you are on a paid plan, but scaling up DMARC management without also scaling marketing contacts might feel less streamlined. The interface prioritizes ease of use for marketing tasks over deep DMARC analysis.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) is for the technically proficient. Setting it up requires a good understanding of servers, databases, and DMARC itself, as it is a self-hosted solution. The user experience isn't about a polished SaaS dashboard, but rather about interacting with code, configuration files, and potentially building your own front-end or using command-line tools to process and visualize data. We found this required significant upfront investment in time and expertise.
Once set up, the 'user experience' is largely defined by what you build or how you integrate it into your existing systems. It offers immense flexibility but demands a DIY (do-it-yourself) approach. This makes it challenging for those without strong technical skills, but empowering for developers and system administrators who want complete control and customizability over their DMARC reporting infrastructure. It is definitely not a plug-and-play solution.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
ReachMail offers comprehensive support channels, including email, chat, and phone support for paid plans. Their experienced deliverability team is available to help users understand DMARC reports, which is a significant advantage for those new to DMARC. We found their support responsive for general inquiries about their platform, which extends to the DMARC features. This level of accessible support can be invaluable for non-technical users.
However, the depth of DMARC-specific support might be limited to how it integrates with their marketing platform. While they can help you interpret your reports, they might not offer advanced DMARC policy consultation or complex troubleshooting beyond their immediate service scope. For more nuanced DMARC issues across various sending sources, you might need external expertise.
Support for Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) is exclusively community-driven. This means you rely on forums and other users to troubleshoot issues, ask questions, and find solutions. While open-source communities can be vibrant and helpful, the response time and depth of assistance can vary greatly. We found that the quality of support depends heavily on the activity and expertise of the community at any given time.
There is no dedicated technical support team for Fraudmarc CE. This model means you need to be self-reliant or have in-house expertise to handle any problems. For complex deployments or urgent issues, this can be a significant drawback. The trade-off for a free, flexible solution is the absence of formal, guaranteed support channels, which is typical for open-source projects.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
ReachMail is best for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and even some enterprise-level organizations that primarily need DMARC to secure their email marketing efforts. It's particularly well-suited for marketing teams looking for an all-in-one solution where email sending and DMARC are intertwined. It’s less ideal for those who need a dedicated, advanced DMARC platform across many disparate sending services.
For managed service providers (MSPs), ReachMail might be suitable if their clients are also using ReachMail for their marketing. However, for a broader DMARC service across diverse client infrastructures, its integrated nature could be a limitation. It’s not self-hostable, so MSPs cannot deploy it within their own environments for multiple clients easily. For enterprise clients with complex email ecosystems, ReachMail's DMARC features might not offer the depth required for advanced threat intelligence or policy enforcement.
Fraudmarc Community Edition (CE) is ideal for technically savvy individuals, developers, and small organizations (SMBs) with in-house IT expertise who want a free, flexible DMARC reporting solution. It's perfect for those who want to understand DMARC without commercial overhead and are willing to invest time in setup and maintenance. It's also suitable for educational purposes or proof-of-concept deployments.
For MSPs and enterprise organizations, Fraudmarc CE could serve as a foundational component that requires significant integration and customization. It is self-hostable, offering MSPs the control to integrate it into their custom client solutions, but this requires substantial development work. It is generally not suitable for non-technical users or organizations that require a turn-key DMARC solution with official support and advanced features. The lack of out-of-the-box multi-tenancy also limits its direct use for MSPs managing many clients.

How does ReachMail compare with Fraudmarc Community Edition?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

ReachMail's DMARC offering is basic and tied to its marketing plans, which means you pay for a full marketing suite even if DMARC is your primary need. Fraudmarc Community Edition, while free, demands significant technical expertise and lacks any dedicated support, relying solely on its community.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

ReachMail's DMARC features are part of a broader marketing platform with contact-based pricing, whereas Fraudmarc Community Edition is entirely free but self-managed.
Logo
Logo
Small
Starts at $8/month (500 contacts) for Basic plan (1 DMARC domain).
Free (self-managed).
Medium
Pricing scales with contacts (1-3 DMARC domains, or unlimited on Pro).
Free (self-managed).
Large
Pricing scales with contacts (unlimited DMARC domains on Pro).
Free (self-managed).
Enterprise
Contact for pricing (unlimited DMARC domains on Custom plan).
Free (self-managed).

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with ReachMail or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions