Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense offers a comprehensive suite designed to protect organizations from various email-based threats, far beyond just DMARC enforcement. It provides extensive DMARC deployment streamlining with dedicated consultants, customizable project plans, and guided workflows to identify legitimate senders and implement a DMARC reject policy safely. We have found their approach to be incredibly thorough, focusing on avoiding the accidental blocking of valid emails.
Beyond DMARC, Proofpoint focuses on protecting organizational reputation by preventing domain and lookalike domain spoofing. It provides 360-degree visibility into the email ecosystem, dynamically identifying lookalike domains and showing which domains attackers have targeted. Their hosted authentication services, including Hosted SPF, Hosted DKIM, and Hosted DMARC, simplify the management of complex DNS records and overcome common limitations like the 10-lookup SPF limit. This integrated approach ensures robust security across all email authentication vectors.
Centera DMARC Compliance, in our experience, provides a more focused approach primarily on DMARC reporting and enforcement. It aims to help organizations achieve DMARC compliance to prevent email spoofing and phishing attacks. We anticipate its core strength lies in aggregating DMARC reports, visualizing authentication results, and guiding users through the necessary steps to move towards an enforcement policy.
While detailed features are not publicly available, we would expect Centera to offer standard DMARC functionalities such as email source identification, SPF and DKIM authentication monitoring, and tools for policy management. Its design likely prioritizes ease of use for companies primarily looking to implement DMARC without necessarily needing the broader, more advanced security features offered by larger security platforms.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, given its vast array of features, presents a steep learning curve during initial setup and configuration. We have noted that implementation can be challenging, often requiring the guidance of dedicated consultants. Once configured, the daily operational use is generally smooth, especially for handling incoming spam and fraudulent emails, with easy widgets for releasing legitimate emails.
However, the user interface itself can sometimes feel less intuitive. While powerful, the dashboard and various settings might require users to spend time understanding the navigation and different options. This complexity is often a trade-off for the depth of functionality offered, meaning that organizations with dedicated security teams will likely derive the most benefit from its capabilities.
Centera DMARC Compliance appears to be designed with a focus on simplicity, aiming to make DMARC implementation and monitoring accessible. We expect the onboarding process to be relatively straightforward, guiding users through DNS record setup and initial reporting configurations without excessive complexity. Its narrower scope compared to a full-fledged email security suite often translates into a more streamlined user experience.
The interface is likely geared towards presenting DMARC reporting data clearly, allowing users to quickly identify legitimate and fraudulent email sources. While it might lack the advanced customization options of more extensive platforms, its directness would benefit users who prioritize a simple, effective tool for DMARC compliance without getting bogged down in extraneous features.
Which product has the best support
Support
Proofpoint’s support can be a mixed bag based on our observations. Many users praise the “awesome support” received from their team, especially when it comes to complex DMARC implementations and ongoing monitoring. Having a professional team driving the DMARC journey can certainly make the process smoother, automating tasks and providing expert guidance.
However, we have also seen feedback suggesting inconsistencies, with some users reporting difficulties in getting a timely response or having to follow up multiple times to get a single reply. While dedicated teams are highly valued, securing their time on a busy schedule can sometimes be a challenge. This suggests that the quality of support may vary depending on the specific team or individual assigned.
Information on Centera DMARC Compliance’s support model is not readily available, but we would expect a standard approach featuring ticket-based assistance, email support, and potentially an online knowledge base. For a tool focused on DMARC, competent support for DNS record setup, DMARC report interpretation, and policy enforcement issues would be essential.
Without specific user reviews or public details, we cannot offer a definitive assessment of their support quality. It is often prudent for potential users to inquire directly about support channels, response times, and the availability of expert guidance, especially for critical email security functions like DMARC. A robust support system is key for seamless DMARC compliance.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense is best suited for large enterprises and organizations with complex, advanced email security requirements. Its extensive feature set, including supplier risk visibility, comprehensive domain discovery, and deep integration with email gateways, makes it a robust solution for environments facing sophisticated threats and needing end-to-end protection.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Proofpoint could be a powerful tool to offer clients, particularly those in the enterprise space, but it would require significant investment in expertise and resources to manage effectively. It is generally less ideal for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) that might find its comprehensive nature to be overkill and its pricing structure geared towards larger budgets and more intricate needs.
Centera DMARC Compliance is likely a better fit for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and mid-market companies that are primarily focused on achieving and maintaining DMARC compliance without the need for a broader email security suite. Its expected simplicity and dedicated DMARC focus would appeal to organizations looking for an effective, yet straightforward, solution to combat email spoofing.
MSPs could find Centera useful for managing DMARC compliance for a portfolio of clients who have basic to moderate DMARC requirements, offering a manageable tool for essential email authentication. Enterprise clients might find its features insufficient if they require advanced threat protection, extensive customization, or integration with a wider security ecosystem beyond DMARC.
How does Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC reports (RUA/RUF).
Source detection
Identifying all legitimate and unauthorized sending sources.
Forward detection
Visibility into email forwarding chains and their DMARC impact.
Spoof detection
Identifying direct domain spoofing and lookalike attacks.
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for policy changes or suspicious activity.
Reporting
Customizable dashboards and data export options.
API
Programmatic access for integration with other systems.
Not typically a feature for basic DMARC solutions.
Multi-tenancy
Managing multiple domains or clients from a single interface.
Not mentioned, usually an advanced feature.
SPF flattening
Simplifying SPF records to avoid lookup limits.
Explicitly offered as Hosted SPF.
Not mentioned, less common for DMARC-only tools.
Hosted DMARC
Managing DMARC records on the provider's infrastructure.
Explicitly offered as Hosted DMARC.
Not mentioned.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Less common in basic DMARC tools.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for secure email transport protocols.
Advanced security not always in DMARC-focused tools.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring and leveraging external blocklists and sender reputation.
Integral to their fraud defense.
Not a primary focus of DMARC compliance.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC insights and management.
Not explicitly advertised.
Not explicitly advertised.
DNS monitoring
Continuous monitoring for DNS record integrity and domain discovery.
Part of their comprehensive domain discovery.
Not a core DMARC compliance feature.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on private infrastructure.
Cloud-based SaaS solution.
Cloud-based SaaS solution.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Requires contacting sales for pricing.
Pricing details are not publicly available.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense offers extensive capabilities, but its complexity can lead to configuration challenges and occasional over-filtering of legitimate emails. Its support can be inconsistent, sometimes requiring persistence. Centera DMARC Compliance lacks publicly detailed features and pricing, making it harder to assess advanced functionality, but its focus might mean less comprehensive protection compared to a full-suite solution.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.3 / 5(12)
0 / 5(0)
Overkill
2.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Great filters for junk and spam. Easy widgets in email notifications to release legit email that is not spam What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Too much filtering. At times, overkill. Filters out legitimate emails. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Protect network from illicit email spoofing. Employees that are non tech savvy that click on fishing emails.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Not sure if it's worth the hassle
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I do like that it auto scans my emails and sorts out the scam/fraudulent ones. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I greatly dislike having to wait for the flagged emails, that are actually not fraudulent, but something that I am looking for. It does not send me the alert until the next day, and then once its been released and approved, it ends up taking another 10 minutes or so (Max) to get to me. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? I am getting significantly fewer fraudulent/scam emails
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Email Protection by Proofpoint Fraud Defence
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? This product provides email protection for both Inbound and outbound emails from all the domains which help in securing the mailboxes. This adds the advantage of the analytics features alike continuously shows the volume of mails as phishing /secures messages. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Like other proofpoint products this also has implementing and configuring problems as they are not easy to configure in the organization environment. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: This product offers you great security over emails and customers can leverage the support and different product portfolio they offer. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We are securing our emails from phising mails /messages for all the domains and for both inbound outbound messages.
Anjali V.
Cyber Security Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Reliable tool for spam emails!
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great reliable tool and keep your inbox more secure and spam free. As a security measure this is great tool which prevents from any fraudulent emails and send alerts as necessary. I am currently using at my company and find all the spam emails being avoided. We usually receives too many on our generic email alias and this help in securing. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great tool, though I find the use of it a very little. Only being capable of avoiding spam emails. Also the dashboard is not much interactive Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: It was always better to have precaution than being penalized by unwanted threat. It's always good to be more secure and spam free and take preventive steps towards running your business securely. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We consider our emails to be safe and spam free. And probably easy to set up
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
We use it as our Email Proxy.
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Ability to filter by most likely spam emails. We also have the ability to open up domains. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? The UI can be a bit more intuitive if it was up to me. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: I would recommend for the ease of use and security features offered. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Fraud emails and Spam emails for our Enterprise account.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Pricing
Proofpoint requires custom quotes for its extensive suite, while Centera's pricing details are not publicly available, indicating a similar contact-for-pricing model.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense or Centera DMARC Compliance?
4.3 / 5(12)
