Suped

Palisade vs Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense

Choose Palisade for a potentially simpler interface, choose Proofpoint for comprehensive enterprise features.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers a robust set of features for DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We found it provided clear insights into email authentication results, allowing us to identify legitimate sending sources and unauthorized spoofing attempts effectively. The platform helps in navigating the complexities of DMARC with tools for policy management and aggregation of reports.
Beyond core DMARC, Palisade integrates elements like SPF flattening and hosted DMARC services, which simplify DNS management. It also provides mechanisms for deep analysis of sending behavior, allowing us to pinpoint issues that could affect deliverability and trust.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense (EFD) is a comprehensive solution designed for large organizations, providing extensive DMARC capabilities alongside broader email security features. We noted its advanced analytics for detecting sophisticated email fraud, including lookalike domain spoofing, and its ability to offer a 360-degree view of the email ecosystem.
EFD stands out with its hosted authentication services for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, streamlining what can often be a cumbersome process. Its integration with Proofpoint's secure email gateway provides a powerful defense, enforcing DMARC on inbound traffic and offering a virtual takedown service for malicious domains. The supplier risk visibility is also a unique and valuable addition.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with Palisade indicated a focus on clarity and accessibility. The dashboards are generally intuitive, providing a good overview of DMARC compliance at a glance. Navigating through reports and identifying specific issues felt straightforward, even for users less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication.
While powerful, like any DMARC tool, there's a learning curve. However, Palisade seems designed to mitigate this with a logical flow and clear data visualization, which helps in quickly understanding report data and making informed decisions on policy enforcement.
Proofpoint EFD, being part of a broader security suite, can feel more complex upon initial use. The UI, while functional, has been described by some users as less intuitive, requiring a period of adjustment to fully leverage its extensive capabilities. We found that the sheer depth of features sometimes made finding specific DMARC-related data a multi-step process.
For organizations already embedded in the Proofpoint ecosystem, the integration can simplify the experience. However, for new users or those accustomed to simpler, dedicated DMARC platforms, there might be an initial hurdle to overcome due to the comprehensive nature of the platform and its many options.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
In our interactions, Palisade provided responsive and knowledgeable support. We found that their team was able to assist with both technical DMARC queries and platform-specific usage questions, helping us quickly resolve issues. The support experience felt personalized, which is often crucial when dealing with email deliverability challenges.
Documentation and self-help resources were adequate, but the direct support team was where Palisade truly shone. They were effective in guiding us through policy changes and interpreting complex DMARC reports, ensuring we could optimize our email security posture.
Proofpoint EFD offers support that is generally highly praised by enterprise users, often providing a professional team to drive DMARC implementation. However, feedback suggests that responsiveness can sometimes be an issue, with users needing to follow up multiple times for a reply. Once a team is assigned, the support quality can be very high.
While there's a strong emphasis on dedicated consultants and automation for large-scale deployments, the general support experience may vary. Some users highlight implementation and configuration challenges that require significant support engagement, suggesting that ongoing assistance is often a necessity for optimal use.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade is well-suited for organizations that prioritize a dedicated and user-friendly DMARC reporting and enforcement tool. It provides the essential features needed for effective email authentication without overwhelming the user with unnecessary complexities.
For MSPs (managed service providers), Palisade offers the capabilities to manage multiple client domains efficiently. SMBs (small and medium businesses) would find it accessible and effective for establishing DMARC, while enterprise clients would benefit from its focused approach to email security and deliverability.
Proofpoint EFD is primarily designed for enterprise-level organizations with complex email environments and a need for a unified, advanced threat protection strategy. Its robust features for domain discovery, supplier risk visibility, and integration with a secure email gateway make it ideal for large-scale deployments.
MSPs managing a portfolio of enterprise clients would find value in EFD's comprehensive capabilities, though the complexity might require specialized knowledge. For SMBs, it might be an 'overkill' (or too much for their needs), while large enterprises will appreciate the extensive controls and advanced fraud detection to protect against sophisticated attacks.

How does Palisade compare with Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Palisade, while offering solid DMARC functionality, currently lacks transparent pricing or public reviews on platforms like G2, making it difficult to assess user sentiment without direct engagement. Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, despite its comprehensive features, sometimes struggles with its user interface and the occasional over-filtering of legitimate emails, leading to delays and additional administrative effort.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Overkill
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Great filters for junk and spam. Easy widgets in email notifications to release legit email that is not spam What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Too much filtering. At times, overkill. Filters out legitimate emails. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Protect network from illicit email spoofing. Employees that are non tech savvy that click on fishing emails.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Not sure if it's worth the hassle
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I do like that it auto scans my emails and sorts out the scam/fraudulent ones. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I greatly dislike having to wait for the flagged emails, that are actually not fraudulent, but something that I am looking for. It does not send me the alert until the next day, and then once its been released and approved, it ends up taking another 10 minutes or so (Max) to get to me. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? I am getting significantly fewer fraudulent/scam emails
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Email Protection by Proofpoint Fraud Defence
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? This product provides email protection for both Inbound and outbound emails from all the domains which help in securing the mailboxes. This adds the advantage of the analytics features alike continuously shows the volume of mails as phishing /secures messages. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Like other proofpoint products this also has implementing and configuring problems as they are not easy to configure in the organization environment. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: This product offers you great security over emails and customers can leverage the support and different product portfolio they offer. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We are securing our emails from phising mails /messages for all the domains and for both inbound outbound messages.
Anjali V.
Cyber Security Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Reliable tool for spam emails!
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great reliable tool and keep your inbox more secure and spam free. As a security measure this is great tool which prevents from any fraudulent emails and send alerts as necessary. I am currently using at my company and find all the spam emails being avoided. We usually receives too many on our generic email alias and this help in securing. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great tool, though I find the use of it a very little. Only being capable of avoiding spam emails. Also the dashboard is not much interactive Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: It was always better to have precaution than being penalized by unwanted threat. It's always good to be more secure and spam free and take preventive steps towards running your business securely. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We consider our emails to be safe and spam free. And probably easy to set up
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
We use it as our Email Proxy.
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Ability to filter by most likely spam emails. We also have the ability to open up domains. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? The UI can be a bit more intuitive if it was up to me. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: I would recommend for the ease of use and security features offered. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Fraud emails and Spam emails for our Enterprise account.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

Both Palisade and Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense do not publicly disclose their pricing, requiring direct contact for quotes specific to an organization's needs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Palisade or Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions