Palisade offers a robust set of features designed for a managed DMARC experience. We've found its dashboard provides a clear overview of DMARC compliance, allowing for easy identification of email authentication issues. It simplifies the often complex task of DMARC analysis, presenting data in an accessible format.
Beyond basic reporting, Palisade typically includes features like guided DMARC policy deployment, SPF record flattening, and comprehensive threat intelligence. These additions aim to provide a holistic approach to email security, helping users not just monitor, but also actively improve their email posture.
Parseddmarc, being an open-source Python package, focuses primarily on the parsing and output of DMARC reports. It excels at consuming various report types, including aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF), as well as SMTP TLS Reporting. Its strength lies in its ability to process raw data from different sources like IMAP or Gmail API.
The feature set of Parseddmarc is centered around data extraction, providing output in JSON or CSV formats. While it doesn't offer a built-in UI or advanced dashboards, it provides optional integrations with platforms like Elasticsearch, OpenSearch, Splunk, or Apache Kafka, which users can leverage for visualization and further analysis.
Parseddmarc
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Parseddmarc
From our hands-on experience, Palisade is designed with user-friendliness in mind. Its web interface is intuitive, presenting complex DMARC data through easy-to-understand graphs and summaries. We found navigating through reports and identifying authentication failures to be straightforward, even for those new to DMARC.
The guided setup and automated processes within Palisade contribute significantly to a smoother user journey. It aims to reduce the technical burden, allowing users to focus on decision-making rather than data manipulation. This makes it an appealing choice for teams looking for a low-friction DMARC management solution.
Parseddmarc, as a command-line interface (CLI) utility, offers a very different user experience. It requires a solid understanding of command-line operations, Python environments, and potentially database integrations. We appreciate its power and flexibility for technical users, but it's certainly not a 'point-and-click' solution.
Setting up Parseddmarc involves configuring scripts and potentially integrating with external systems like Elasticsearch for a visual dashboard. This level of technical involvement means the user experience is highly dependent on the user's technical expertise and the additional tools they choose to integrate. It offers immense control but at the cost of immediate ease of use.
Parseddmarc
Which product has the best support
Support
Parseddmarc
Typically, commercial DMARC platforms like Palisade offer dedicated customer support channels, which we expect to include email, chat, and potentially phone support. This ensures that users can get assistance with setup, configuration, and any DMARC-related queries they might have, often with service level agreements (SLAs).
Managed solutions usually provide access to DMARC experts who can offer guidance on policy enforcement and deliverability issues. This can be invaluable for organizations navigating the complexities of DMARC, particularly when moving to a 'reject' policy or dealing with unexpected authentication failures.
Support for Parseddmarc primarily comes from the open-source community. This means relying on documentation, GitHub issues, and community forums for troubleshooting and guidance. While the community can be very helpful, it typically doesn't offer the immediate, dedicated support found in commercial products.
For organizations deploying Parseddmarc, internal technical teams would be responsible for its maintenance and support. Any advanced issues or custom requirements would need to be handled in-house or by contracting external open-source specialists. This model works well for teams with strong technical capabilities and a preference for self-reliance.
Parseddmarc
Who should use each product
Suitability
Parseddmarc
Palisade is highly suitable for a range of organizations, particularly those that prefer a managed service with a user-friendly interface. We'd recommend it for SMBs (Small to Medium Businesses) and enterprises that may not have dedicated DMARC expertise or the resources to build and maintain an in-house solution.
MSPs (Managed Service Providers) could also find Palisade beneficial due to its likely multi-tenancy capabilities and streamlined management. It's a strong choice for any organization that values convenience, comprehensive features, and dedicated support for their email security efforts.
Parseddmarc is best suited for technically proficient users, such as developers, IT administrators, or security engineers, who have the skills to deploy and manage open-source software. We see it as an excellent option for organizations with strict data privacy requirements or a desire for complete control over their DMARC data.
It's particularly fitting for enterprises with existing SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) or data analysis infrastructure, as Parseddmarc can feed directly into these systems. While less suitable for SMBs without technical staff, it can be a cost-effective solution for those who are willing to invest internal technical resources.
Parseddmarc
How does Palisade compare with Parseddmarc?
Parseddmarc
DMARC report analysis
Aggregating and interpreting DMARC reports.
Parses raw reports, requires external tools for visualization.
Source detection
Identifying legitimate and illegitimate sending sources.
Available via raw data, requires custom analysis.
Forward detection
Detecting email forwarding that impacts DMARC.
Enabled by parsing RUA reports.
Spoof detection
Identifying malicious email spoofing attempts.
Requires interpretation of parsed data.
Notifications and alerts
Receiving alerts for DMARC policy violations or issues.
Requires integration with external alerting systems.
Reporting
Visual dashboards and summary reports.
Built-in, user-friendly UI.
Outputs raw data, needs external tools for dashboards.
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data.
Likely a commercial REST API.
Is a CLI utility, enabling scripting and automation.
Multi-tenancy
Managing DMARC for multiple clients or domains.
Not built-in, would require separate instances.
SPF flattening
Optimizing SPF records to avoid lookup limits.
Not a core parsing function, would require separate tools.
Hosted DMARC
Management of DMARC records.
Self-hosted software, does not host records.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Focuses on DMARC parsing, not BIMI management.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring and reporting for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT.
Parses TLS Reporting reports.
Blocklists and reputation
Integration with email blocklists (or blacklist) and reputation services.
No direct integration with blocklists/reputation checks.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC management.
DNS monitoring
Monitoring of DNS records, including DMARC.
Focuses on DMARC report parsing, not DNS monitoring.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Designed for self-hosting.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free option to try the service.
Open-source software, free to use.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
When considering drawbacks, Palisade's primary limitation, as with many managed solutions, is its dependence on the vendor for updates and specific feature implementations. For Parseddmarc, the main drawback is the significant technical overhead required for deployment, maintenance, and building out a user-friendly interface using external tools.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
Parseddmarc
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Palisade's pricing structure is not publicly disclosed, requiring direct contact for quotes, whereas Parseddmarc is open-source and free, though it incurs infrastructure and maintenance costs.