Suped

Palisade vs KDmarc

Choose Palisade for robust features, choose KDmarc for simplicity.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features, designed to provide in-depth insights into your email ecosystem. We found its dashboard to be quite detailed, displaying a wealth of data points necessary for advanced DMARC analysis and enforcement.
Key capabilities include granular DMARC report aggregation, intuitive source identification, and robust forward detection. It also provides tools for managing SPF, DKIM, and BIMI, which are essential for maintaining a strong email security posture.
KDmarc focuses on a more streamlined approach to DMARC reporting, aiming for clarity and ease of use. Its feature set covers the essentials, providing a solid foundation for organizations beginning their DMARC journey or those seeking a less complex solution.
We observed that KDmarc excels in presenting DMARC data in an easily digestible format, making it straightforward to understand email authentication results. While it might not offer the same depth of customization as Palisade, it efficiently handles report aggregation, basic source identification, and policy management.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade provides a feature-rich interface that, while powerful, can sometimes feel overwhelming for new users. The learning curve is noticeable, requiring a degree of familiarity with DMARC concepts to fully leverage its capabilities. However, for those who appreciate detailed data and control, this complexity is a trade-off worth considering.
Navigation involves various menus and sub-menus to access different reports and settings. Customization options are extensive, allowing users to tailor their dashboards and alerts, but this also adds to the initial setup time.
KDmarc prioritizes a clean and intuitive user experience. We found its dashboard to be straightforward, presenting critical DMARC data without unnecessary clutter. The focus here is on guiding users through the process of achieving DMARC enforcement with minimal friction.
Its simplified interface makes it an excellent choice for users who prefer a 'set it and forget it' approach, or those with less technical expertise in email security. While it may lack some advanced customization, the ease of use means faster onboarding and quicker insights into email traffic.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers support primarily through documentation and email. While the documentation is extensive, we sometimes found ourselves digging through articles to find specific answers. For more complex issues, direct email support was available, and responses were generally thorough.
The support is geared towards users who are comfortable with self-service, though it provides the necessary resources for problem-solving. It's effective for those who prefer to learn and resolve issues independently with expert guidance when needed.
KDmarc provides a more hands-on support experience, particularly beneficial for users who prefer direct assistance. We noted that they emphasize guided setup and readily offer help with DMARC implementation and troubleshooting.
Beyond email support, they also offer educational resources and personalized guidance. This approach can be particularly valuable for smaller teams or individuals who may not have dedicated DMARC specialists. Their responsiveness and willingness to assist stood out during our evaluation.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade is highly suitable for enterprise-level organizations and large businesses that require granular control, extensive data analysis, and robust reporting capabilities. Its comprehensive feature set is well-suited for complex email infrastructures and compliance requirements. For MSPs, it offers the depth needed to manage multiple clients with diverse DMARC needs, but may require a more technical team.
SMBs might find its extensive feature set to be overkill, potentially leading to unnecessary complexity for simpler DMARC deployments. However, if an SMB has advanced security needs and dedicated resources, Palisade can certainly deliver.
KDmarc is an excellent choice for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that value simplicity and straightforward DMARC implementation. Its ease of use and guided approach make it accessible for teams with limited email security expertise. MSPs managing a large volume of SMB clients could also benefit from its user-friendly interface for quicker setup.
While enterprise users might miss some of the advanced functionalities and custom reporting options available in more complex tools, KDmarc provides a solid and effective solution for achieving DMARC compliance and improving email deliverability without the steep learning curve.

How does Palisade compare with KDmarc?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Palisade, while feature-rich, can have a steeper learning curve, which might deter users seeking immediate simplicity. Its extensive options, though powerful, sometimes necessitate a deeper dive into settings. KDmarc, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use but consequently offers fewer advanced features and customization, which might feel restrictive for larger, more complex organizations. Neither product offers a free tier, meaning you commit without extensive hands-on experience.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both Palisade and KDmarc require direct contact for pricing, making it challenging to compare costs without engagement, but they likely cater to different budget needs based on their target audience.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Palisade or KDmarc?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Palisade vs KDmarc DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped