Suped

Palisade vs DMARCAnalyzer

Choose Palisade for robust features, DMARCAnalyzer for a streamlined user experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and enforcement tools, designed to provide deep insights into email authentication data. It excels in granular reporting, allowing users to drill down into specific data points, identify all sending sources, and track authentication trends over time. The platform provides detailed aggregate and forensic reports, making it easier to pinpoint unauthorized senders and mitigate spoofing attempts.
Beyond core DMARC, Palisade integrates advanced features like SPF flattening to overcome the 10-lookup limit and hosted DMARC, simplifying record management. It also supports BIMI for brand visibility and offers MTA-STS/TLS-RPT for secure email transport, giving organizations a full spectrum of tools to enhance their email security posture.
DMARCAnalyzer (now part of Mimecast) focuses on delivering clear, actionable DMARC insights, aiming to simplify the complex world of email authentication. Its platform is adept at presenting DMARC reports in an understandable format, enabling users to quickly identify legitimate and fraudulent email sources. We've found its initial setup and dashboard navigation to be straightforward, making it accessible for those new to DMARC.
The tool provides strong capabilities for source identification and threat detection, helping users move their DMARC policy towards enforcement efficiently. While it covers essential DMARC components like SPF and DKIM alignment, it emphasizes ease of use in visualizing report data and managing DMARC records. Its integration within the broader Mimecast ecosystem suggests a cohesive approach to email security.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade provides a functional, data-rich interface that caters to users who appreciate detailed information. The dashboards are comprehensive, offering various charts and graphs to visualize DMARC data. While the depth of information is a significant strength, it can sometimes feel a bit overwhelming for new users, requiring a learning curve to fully utilize all its capabilities. Navigation is logical, but the sheer volume of data means we often spend time filtering to find specific insights.
Its strength lies in its configurability. We can customize views and reports to suit specific analytical needs. For those who need to deeply analyze every aspect of their email flow and identify subtle anomalies, Palisade’s detailed approach is highly beneficial. However, for a quick overview or for users who prefer simplicity, it might present a steeper learning curve compared to more streamlined alternatives.
DMARCAnalyzer generally offers a more intuitive and user-friendly experience. Its interface is clean and well-organized, with a focus on presenting critical information clearly and concisely. We've found that getting started and understanding the core DMARC reports is significantly easier, making it a good choice for organizations that prioritize quick insights and less complexity. The visual representations of data are easy to interpret at a glance.
The streamlined design, however, sometimes means that advanced customization options or deep-dive functionalities are less prominent than in more feature-heavy platforms. While it certainly provides all necessary tools for DMARC management, power users might find themselves wishing for more granular control over data presentation or more complex querying options. Overall, it strikes a good balance between functionality and ease of use.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with Palisade's support indicates a team that is knowledgeable, particularly concerning the intricacies of DMARC implementation and troubleshooting. They offer assistance primarily through email and a ticketing system, which is standard for technical platforms. Responses are generally thorough and address the technical questions effectively, demonstrating a good grasp of the product and DMARC protocols.
Documentation is available and useful for self-service problem-solving. While live chat or immediate phone support might not always be the primary channel, the quality of their technical expertise is a strong point. For complex DMARC challenges, their in-depth guidance is valuable, though it might require a little patience for initial response times.
As part of Mimecast, DMARCAnalyzer benefits from a broader support infrastructure. We found that their support channels typically include a mix of email, a knowledge base, and potentially phone support depending on the Mimecast service tier. The support team is generally responsive and helpful, guiding users through setup, policy changes, and report interpretation. The integration with Mimecast means there's a larger ecosystem of resources.
The knowledge base is comprehensive and easy to navigate, offering solutions to common issues and best practices. While the level of personalized attention can sometimes vary, the overall support experience is reliable. Users can generally expect timely and practical advice for optimizing their DMARC implementation, which is a definite plus for ongoing management and troubleshooting.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Palisade is highly suitable for larger enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) who require extensive customization, detailed data analysis, and a comprehensive suite of advanced email security features. Its ability to handle complex domain structures, along with features like SPF flattening and MTA-STS, makes it a powerful tool for organizations with sophisticated DMARC needs. MSPs will appreciate the multi-tenancy capabilities for managing multiple client domains efficiently.
For small to medium businesses (SMBs), Palisade might offer more functionality than immediately necessary, and the interface could present a steeper learning curve. However, if an SMB has advanced security requirements or plans for rapid growth, Palisade provides a scalable solution that can grow with their needs. Its robust reporting is particularly beneficial for security teams needing deep forensic analysis.
DMARCAnalyzer is well-suited for SMBs and mid-market companies seeking a user-friendly and effective solution to implement and monitor DMARC. Its clear interface and actionable insights make it an excellent choice for organizations that want to quickly achieve DMARC enforcement without getting bogged down in excessive technical detail. The integration with Mimecast also provides an advantage for existing Mimecast users.
For MSPs, DMARCAnalyzer can serve as a solid foundation for client DMARC management, offering efficient onboarding and reporting. While it might not have the same depth of advanced features as Palisade, its ease of use for multi-domain management makes it practical for managing multiple clients. Enterprise clients, especially those already using Mimecast for other security services, will find it a convenient addition to their security stack, though very large, complex enterprises might seek more niche, customizable DMARC-only platforms.

How does Palisade compare with DMARCAnalyzer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Palisade, while feature-rich, can present a steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with deeply technical DMARC configurations, and its interface can feel dense at times. DMARCAnalyzer offers a more user-friendly experience, but power users might find its advanced customization options somewhat less extensive compared to its competitors. For some, the integration into the broader Mimecast suite might also mean less direct focus solely on DMARC.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Palisade and DMARCAnalyzer both generally follow a quote-based pricing model, with specific costs depending on the scale of an organization's email volume and desired features, making direct comparison difficult without contacting sales.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Palisade or DMARCAnalyzer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Palisade vs DMARCAnalyzer DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped