MyDMARC offers a comprehensive suite for DMARC reporting and management. We found its primary strength lies in its ability to parse and present DMARC data in an easily digestible format, making it straightforward to identify authentication issues and potential spoofing attempts.
The platform provides clear insights into sender sources and compliance rates, which is crucial for achieving DMARC enforcement. It also includes tools for SPF and DKIM record analysis, helping us ensure our email authentication protocols are correctly configured and optimized.
MailHardener distinguishes itself with a strong focus on overall email security beyond just DMARC. While it excels at DMARC reporting, we noted its robust features for general DNS security, including advanced SPF and DKIM monitoring, as well as MTA-STS and TLS-RPT implementation.
The platform aims to provide a holistic view of an organization's email infrastructure's security posture. It's designed for users who want deep control and insight into all aspects of email authentication and transmission security, not just report aggregation.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
MyDMARC generally provides a user-friendly interface. We found navigating through reports and settings to be intuitive, especially for those familiar with DMARC concepts. The dashboards are clean, presenting key metrics without overwhelming the user with too much detail.
Setting up new domains and configuring alerts was a relatively smooth process. While it offers detailed views, the initial learning curve is gentle enough for users to get started quickly and gain valuable insights into their email streams.
MailHardener, while powerful, has a slightly steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set. We noticed that its interface, while functional, requires users to be more comfortable with a broader range of email security protocols.
However, for those seeking granular control and advanced configurations, this depth is a clear advantage. Once accustomed to the layout, users can leverage its comprehensive tools effectively, but beginners might need more time to fully grasp all functionalities.
Which product has the best support
Support
In our experience, MyDMARC offers standard email support, with priority support available for higher-tier plans. The responses we received were generally helpful and addressed our queries effectively, especially concerning DMARC report interpretation.
The available documentation is sufficient for common issues and setup procedures. For routine DMARC management, the support system works well, guiding users through the platform's features and troubleshooting basic authentication failures.
MailHardener provides comprehensive support that aligns with its more technical user base. We found the support team to be knowledgeable about the intricacies of email security, offering in-depth assistance for complex configurations like MTA-STS.
Their support often extends beyond basic troubleshooting to provide guidance on optimizing overall email security posture. For advanced users or those managing critical infrastructure, this level of expertise is highly valuable and responsive.
Who should use each product
Suitability
MyDMARC is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations primarily focused on achieving DMARC compliance without extensive overhead. Its straightforward interface and clear reporting make it an excellent choice for teams with limited email security expertise.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), MyDMARC could be a viable option for clients needing basic DMARC monitoring. While it may not offer the deepest multi-tenancy features for large-scale MSP operations, it serves as a reliable tool for core DMARC needs. Enterprise clients might find it a good starting point but may eventually seek more advanced, integrated solutions.
MailHardener is best suited for medium to large enterprises and organizations that require a robust, all-encompassing email security platform. Its advanced features cater to users who need detailed control over DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and other critical email authentication and transmission security protocols.
MSPs will find MailHardener particularly attractive due to its explicit support for multi-tenancy and the ability to manage multiple client domains efficiently, providing a strong security offering. SMBs might find its feature set a bit overkill unless they have specific, advanced security requirements and a dedicated IT team to manage them.
How does MyDMARC compare with MailHardener?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregates and analyzes DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Comprehensive DMARC report parsing and visualization.
Detailed DMARC report analysis with actionable insights.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.
Clear identification of sending IPs and services.
Accurate detection of all email senders.
Forward detection
Helps distinguish forwarded emails from spoofed ones.
Insights into email forwarding patterns.
Sophisticated forwarding analysis to reduce false positives.
Spoof detection
Pinpoints attempts to impersonate your domain.
Effective identification of email spoofing attempts.
Robust mechanisms for detecting brand impersonation.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC policy changes or threats.
Customizable alerts for critical DMARC events.
Real-time notifications for security incidents and misconfigurations.
Reporting
Provides various reports on email authentication status.
Granular reporting options for DMARC compliance.
Extensive reporting, including DMARC, SPF, and DKIM statistics.
API
Allows programmatic access for integration and automation.
Provides an API for data integration and management.
Offers an API for advanced automation and custom integrations.
Multi-tenancy
Manages multiple client domains from a single account.
Supports management of multiple domains.
Designed with MSPs in mind, offering multi-client management.
SPF flattening
Helps overcome SPF 10-lookup limit.
Includes tools for SPF record optimization.
Automated SPF flattening to prevent exceeding lookup limits.
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records directly on the platform.
Provides hosted DMARC records for convenience.
Offers hosted DMARC records as part of its service.
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
Tools to help with BIMI record deployment and monitoring.
Comprehensive support for BIMI implementation and validation.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Advanced email transmission security protocols.
Helps manage MTA-STS and TLS-RPT records.
Robust features for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT deployment and monitoring.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors domain and IP reputation on email blocklists.
Provides some insights into domain reputation and blocklist status.
Extensive monitoring of blocklists (or blacklists) and domain reputation.
AI copilot
AI-powered assistant for DMARC management and insights.
DNS monitoring
Monitors various DNS records for changes or issues.
Basic monitoring of relevant DNS records.
Advanced DNS record monitoring for comprehensive security.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own servers.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free version or trial period.
Available free plan for 1 domain.
Includes a free option.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Based on our hands-on experience, MyDMARC's primary drawback is that its focus is almost exclusively on DMARC reporting, potentially requiring additional tools for a complete email security strategy. MailHardener, while comprehensive, can be intimidating for new users due to its feature depth, and its pricing transparency isn't always clear outside of a free option.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
MyDMARC offers clear, tiered pricing based on the number of domains, while MailHardener's pricing for paid plans is less transparent and often requires direct contact, especially for larger deployments.