MyDMARC vs.
Kevlarr in 2026
MyDMARC
Kevlarr
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and Kevlarr for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. MyDMARC was faster to price and simple to run for a small domain set. Kevlarr handled MSP-style account separation, alert filtering, and support handoff better.
MyDMARC
Low-cost DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams managing a few domains
In one line
MyDMARC gave us a clean path into aggregate DMARC reports, but teams that require guided fixes and published starter pricing should compare Suped as a third option.
Kevlarr
DMARC for MSPs and security operators
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
MSPs and small security teams managing many domains
In one line
Kevlarr was better at grouping customers, filtering report noise, and turning repeated DMARC checks into an operator routine.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick the tool by ownership model
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for small teams that need simple DMARC reporting without a sales process
Free tier covered our parked domain, but 7-day retention was too short for weekly review.
Basic and Pro limits were clear for the three-domain setup, with hourly or near real-time parsing.
Unknown sender classification required manual investigation before we assigned an owner.
Free plan available
Pick Kevlarr if
Best for MSPs and operators that manage many customer domains
Customer grouping made the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain easier to separate.
AI filtering reduced noise in forwarded mail where SPF failed while legitimate forwarding explained delivery.
Client-ready reporting and partner workflows were more useful for handoff than MyDMARC.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should turn Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk findings into owner-ready tasks.
Automated issue detection and alert quality should separate spoofing, forwarding, and configuration drift without daily manual triage.
Published starter pricing should make domain and email-volume planning clear before procurement.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
Kevlarr
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Ability to parse aggregate reports and show authentication outcomes by source.
Supported, reporting focused
Supported, operator focused
Supported
Source detection
Ability to identify sending services behind DMARC traffic.
Supported, manual ownership
Supported, stronger grouping
Supported
Forward detection
Ability to separate forwarded mail from true authentication abuse.
Manual workflow
Supported through filtering
Supported
Spoof detection
Ability to surface unauthorized use of a protected domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Ability to notify teams when authentication or volume changes need attention.
Supported, limited routing
Supported, better filtering
Supported
Reporting
Ability to export or share useful DMARC status with stakeholders.
Supported
Supported, client-ready
Supported
API
Ability to automate setup, reporting, or operational workflows.
Not found in public plans
Supported
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Ability to separate clients, accounts, or managed domain groups.
Unclear
Supported for partners
Supported
SPF flattening
Ability to reduce SPF lookup risk with a managed flattening workflow.
Not supported
SPF lookup support, not flattening
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Ability to manage DMARC policy records through the product.
Not supported
Generated record guidance only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Ability to host or manage SPF records through the product.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Ability to host or manage MTA-STS and TLS reporting records.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Ability to monitor blocklist or blacklist signals alongside authentication.
Not found
Not found
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Ability to flag likely issues without relying on manual report review.
Manual workflow
Supported with AI filtering
Supported
AI copilot
Ability to use AI assistance for investigation or noise reduction.
Not supported
AI filtering, not tested as chat
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ability to watch DNS authentication records for changes or problems.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on the buyer's own infrastructure.
Not supported
Not supported
Not supported
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a no-cost entry point or trial.
Free tier
Free monitoring
Free plan
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against the same editorial rubric after completing the same setup, classification, alerting, policy, export, and support checks. Higher is better in every row, and a zero means we did not find support for that capability during the test or in public product information.
MyDMARC is stronger on simple entry pricing, while Kevlarr scores higher on operations and support
MyDMARC earned points for public pricing, fast setup, and enough report detail to validate Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp authentication, but it lost ground where ownership, alert routing, hosted records, and MSP handoff mattered. Kevlarr scored higher on customer separation, AI filtering, API-led workflows, and support handoff, but its DMARC-specific paid pricing and plan limits were not public. Both products scored zero where we did not find hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or blocklist (blacklist) monitoring.
MyDMARC score
44.5/100
Kevlarr score
58.5/100
MyDMARC
44.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
3.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.0
Kevlarr
58.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.5
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
4.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Feature set
Depth vs workflow coverage
Kevlarr covers more operator workflows. MyDMARC stays narrower and clearer.
Kevlarr had the broader feature set in our test because it separated customer contexts, filtered forwarded mail noise, and exposed API-led workflows. MyDMARC covered the core DMARC report path well, but unknown sender classification took more manual work. For teams comparing a third option, Suped's product should be judged on whether guided fixes and automated issue detection turn each sender finding into a clear owner action.
MyDMARC
Microsoft 365 checks were clear
Mailchimp needed manual ownership
Mismatch case was visible
Kevlarr
SendGrid grouped cleanly
Forwarded SPF noise filtered
Unknown sender easier to triage
MyDMARC handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace domain-match checks quickly and gave enough aggregate report detail to confirm SendGrid and Mailchimp were passing DKIM. The unknown support desk sender appeared as an unclassified source until we matched IP ownership and headers outside the product. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible in the report detail, but the next step was an analyst decision instead of a guided remediation path.
Kevlarr grouped the same sources into a more operator-friendly workflow. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were easy to separate from SendGrid and Mailchimp, and the AI filtering reduced noise in the forwarded mail case where SPF failed. The spoof sample surfaced as an issue that deserved action, while the unknown sender still needed human confirmation before we trusted the classification.
User experience
Guided setup vs operator console
MyDMARC is easier to start. Kevlarr is easier to run across accounts.
The first MyDMARC session moved quickly because the DNS record steps were direct and the product stayed close to raw DMARC concepts. Kevlarr took slightly more orientation, but its customer switching and filtered views saved time after the first week. The tradeoff is simple: MyDMARC felt lighter, Kevlarr felt more operational.
MyDMARC
Fast three-domain onboarding
Unknown sender stayed manual
Forwarding needed explanation
Kevlarr
Customer switching saved time
Unknown sender filtered faster
Forwarding was easier to explain
Onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in MyDMARC was direct: add the DMARC record, wait for aggregate reports, then review the source list. The parked domain was easy because a reject-ready posture had little legitimate traffic, but the marketing subdomain took more time because SendGrid and Mailchimp needed separate interpretation. Finding the unknown sender took the longest because the interface did not move us through owner assignment.
Kevlarr took more setup decisions up front because we had to think in customer and domain groupings, but that paid off once the three domains started reporting. The unknown sender was faster to isolate because the filtered view reduced routine Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic. Explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure was also easier because Kevlarr separated that case from the unauthorized spoof sample.
Support
Self serve vs hands on help
Kevlarr had the clearer support handoff. MyDMARC relied more on the buyer.
MyDMARC's public tiers made it easy to know what support priority applied, but most setup decisions still stayed with our team. Kevlarr set clearer expectations for managed DMARC and partner support, especially around DNS handoff and escalation. Buyers that want full-service help should confirm response times, included domains, and what happens when a sender owner is outside IT.
MyDMARC
DNS handoff was simple
Enterprise path less clear
Escalation notes were manual
Kevlarr
Specialist handoff was clearer
Partner support fit MSPs
Paid boundaries needed confirmation
With MyDMARC, the DNS handoff was straightforward because the required DMARC record was easy to explain to an administrator. The support path was less defined for enterprise onboarding because public pricing stopped at Pro and did not publish dedicated account management, service levels, or custom deployment steps. When the support desk sender failed classification, we had to prepare the escalation notes ourselves.
Kevlarr's support expectations matched the product's partner orientation. The managed DMARC message gave us a clearer route for asking a specialist to review Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk source before moving policy. The main gap was commercial: the support model looked stronger, but paid plan boundaries and escalation terms still needed a sales conversation.
Suitability
Small team vs MSP fit
MyDMARC fits focused domain owners. Kevlarr fits operators with repeated client work.
MyDMARC made the most sense when one team owned a small set of domains and wanted public starter pricing. Kevlarr was the better fit when account separation, domain grouping, recurring reporting, and client handoff mattered. MSP buyers should also judge Suped's product on alert quality and MSP workflows because noisy alerts and weak handoff notes turn DMARC into recurring manual work.
MyDMARC
Best for direct owners
Weak client separation
Clear small-team pricing
Kevlarr
Best for MSP routines
Client reports felt usable
Paid limits need clarity
MyDMARC was comfortable for the primary corporate domain and the parked domain because one owner could review the source list and decide the next policy step. It was less comfortable for MSP use because we did not see strong client grouping, recurring handoff reports, or account separation during the test. For SMBs that manage their own DNS, the clear domain-based tiers were useful.
Kevlarr fit the MSP and security operator pattern better. The customer view helped separate the corporate domain from the marketing subdomain and parked domain, while recurring reports were easier to turn into client updates. Enterprise teams can use that structure too, but they should validate paid plan limits, SSO needs, API scope, and escalation expectations before committing.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
A practical fit for small teams that want low-friction DMARC reporting
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like a simple reporting product that did the core job without adding much process. We added the three test domains quickly, confirmed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace authentication, and used the reports to verify that SendGrid and Mailchimp were legitimate sources.
The friction appeared when a report finding needed ownership. The unknown sender required manual IP and header investigation, the forwarded mail SPF failure needed an explanation outside the product, and the unauthorized spoof sample was visible but not wrapped in a guided enforcement plan.
Where it wins
Public free, Basic, and Pro pricing made the first budget estimate easy.
The three-domain setup was fast, with clear DMARC record instructions.
Aggregate report detail was enough to validate Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp.
The parked domain was easy to monitor for unauthorized traffic.
Where it lags
Unknown sender classification took manual investigation.
No hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or hosted DMARC workflow was found.
MSP account separation and recurring client handoff were thin.
Alert routing and integrations were limited in our test.
Pricing
Free, then $19 / month
Free tier
1 domain, 7-day retention
Onboarding
Fast DNS setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Kevlarr
A stronger fit for MSPs and operators running DMARC across many domains
Kevlarr felt more operational after the first week. The extra setup decisions around account grouping were worthwhile once reports arrived, because we could separate the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without mixing client-style notes.
The strongest day-to-day difference was noise handling. Kevlarr filtered the forwarded mail SPF failure away from the spoof sample, made the unknown sender easier to triage, and produced reports that were easier to hand to a non-DMARC stakeholder.
Where it wins
Customer and domain grouping worked well for MSP-style review.
AI filtering reduced forwarded mail noise.
API and report workflows fit repeatable operations.
Support expectations were clearer for managed DMARC.
Where it lags
DMARC-specific paid pricing was not public.
Paid plan limits and volume bands needed confirmation.
The interface took longer to learn than MyDMARC.
No hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or blocklist (blacklist) monitoring was found.
Pricing
Free monitoring; paid DMARC pricing not publicly listed
Free tier
Free monitoring available
Onboarding
More setup choices
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
Kevlarr
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain with 7 days of retention; no public email-volume cap was listed.
$0
Official free DMARC monitoring exists, but public pages do not publish domain, retention, or volume limits.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers 5 monitored domains with 30 days of retention and hourly parsing.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Paid DMARC monitoring and managed options exist, but plan limits were not public.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 monitored domains with 90 days of retention; no public email-volume cap was listed.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
MSP and advanced monitoring pages describe capabilities but not a verified DMARC price for this volume.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public tiers stopped at 20 domains, so larger deployments need confirmation.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Partner and managed DMARC pricing mentioned fixed-price MSP language but did not publish an amount.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC dollar amounts are public list prices. Kevlarr's $0 free monitoring is public; no paid Kevlarr dollar amounts were estimated because the DMARC-specific paid prices and limits were not public. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Owner-ready fixes
MyDMARC showed the unknown support desk sender, but ownership and next steps still lived outside the product. Suped turns sender findings into guided fixes so the DNS, marketing, and support owners know what to change.
Cleaner alert routing
Kevlarr filtered noise well, but paid alert boundaries and routing rules needed confirmation. Suped flags spoofing, forwarding, and authentication drift with alerts that can be routed without guessing the plan limit.
Hosted record workflow
Neither product gave us a hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS workflow in the test. Suped gives teams a managed path for those records so policy movement does not depend on repeated manual DNS edits.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or Kevlarr?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
