MyDMARC vs.
Fraudmarc Community Edition in 2026
MyDMARC
0.0/5
Fraudmarc Community Edition
0.0/5
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and Fraudmarc Community Edition for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MyDMARC was faster to operate for a SaaS DMARC workflow, while Fraudmarc CE gave us more control but required AWS ownership, manual classification, and more internal process.
Ava Chen
System Administrator
Published 4 Nov 2025
Updated 31 May 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
MyDMARC
SaaS DMARC reporting for small teams
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMBs that want a hosted DMARC reporting workflow
In one line
MyDMARC got our three domains reporting quickly and made the parked-domain spoof sample easy to isolate.
Fraudmarc Community Edition
Self-hosted DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free software, AWS costs vary
Best fit
Technical teams that want AWS-hosted control
In one line
Fraudmarc CE gave us control of ingestion and storage, but sender naming, alerts, and handoff required more work.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more
Pick MyDMARC for SaaS speed, Fraudmarc CE for self-hosted control
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for small teams that want hosted DMARC reporting without running infrastructure
We added the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain without touching AWS.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace separated quickly in the aggregate reports.
The unauthorized spoof sample on the parked domain was visible without building custom queries.
Free plan available
Pick Fraudmarc Community Edition if
Best for technical operators that want to self-host DMARC data in AWS
The single rua reporting address worked across all three test domains.
We controlled the AWS region, database, and report retention approach.
Unknown sender classification and forwarded-mail explanation needed more manual documentation.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should connect DMARC, SPF, and DKIM findings to the owner and DNS change.
Automated issue detection should reduce manual triage for unknown senders and forwarded mail.
Published starter pricing should make the first domain and growth path clear before sales contact.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
Fraudmarc Community Edition
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate XML parsing, domain-level views, and sender drilldowns.
Supported in hosted reports
Supported in CE
Supported
Source detection
Ability to turn raw report rows into recognizable sending services.
Good for common senders
Partial, more manual naming
Supported
Forward detection
Handling forwarded mail where SPF fails but DKIM still helps authentication.
Partial, readable explanation
Partial, manual workflow
Supported
Spoof detection
Visibility into unauthorized sending against protected domains.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerting for new failures, suspicious senders, and report changes.
Basic alerts
Manual or AWS-built
Supported
Reporting
Shareable reporting for owners, leadership, or clients.
Exports available
Available, self-managed
Supported
API
A user-facing API for operational integrations.
Not publicly listed
Not tested as workflow API
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Clean separation for multiple clients, business units, or delegated owners.
Manual grouping
Manual account separation
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening to reduce DNS lookup risk.
Not publicly listed
Not included in CE
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC record management rather than only reporting.
Reporting only
Reporting only
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records and SPF change control.
Not publicly listed
Not included in CE
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy management and TLS reporting workflow.
Not publicly listed
Not included in CE
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring tied to domain and sending reputation.
Not publicly listed
Not included in CE
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic identification of misalignment, new senders, and authentication drift.
Basic issue flags
Manual classification
Supported
AI copilot
Assistant-style help for diagnosis and next steps.
Not publicly listed
Not included in CE
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing checks for DNS record state and authentication configuration drift.
Supported for authentication records
Manual or AWS-built
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the reporting system in your own environment.
No
Yes, AWS self-hosted
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost way to test real reports before a paid rollout.
Free tier
Free open-source CE
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day setup, the same three domains, and the same controlled authentication cases. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means the capability was not supported in the tested product.
MyDMARC scored higher for ready-to-use DMARC operations; Fraudmarc CE scored higher where infrastructure control mattered.
MyDMARC pulled ahead on setup, source resolution, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement because we could add domains, review Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic, and classify the spoof sample without running infrastructure. Fraudmarc CE kept more control in our hands, but the AWS deployment, unknown sender naming, and alert workflow made the path to enforcement slower. Both products scored 0.0 for hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring because those capabilities were not supported in our test.
MyDMARC score
53.5/100
Fraudmarc Community Edition score
40/100
MyDMARC
53.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
4.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Fraudmarc Community Edition
40/100
DMARC enforcement
5.5
Customer support
4.0
Source resolution
5.0
Setup and onboarding
4.5
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
3.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
5.0
Feature set
SaaS workflow vs self-hosting
MyDMARC wins on ready-made DMARC workflows; Fraudmarc CE wins on control.
MyDMARC gave us more usable product depth for day-to-day DMARC work because source names, report views, and policy movement were already assembled. Fraudmarc CE gave us wider deployment control because we owned the AWS stack and data location, but more workflow decisions moved onto us. For teams also considering Suped, the buying criterion is guided fixes: each failed edge case should become a named sender, an owner, and a DNS change.
MyDMARC
0/5
Microsoft 365 grouped quickly
SendGrid ownership stayed visible
Forwarded SPF was explainable
Fraudmarc Community Edition
0/5
AWS control was useful
Google Workspace parsed cleanly
Unknown sender needed naming
MyDMARC handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly, then kept SendGrid and Mailchimp visible once we labeled the sending sources. The SPF pass with visible from mismatch was easy to spot in the aligned versus unaligned view, and the parked-domain spoof sample gave us a clear reason to keep moving toward enforcement. The unknown sender still required human classification, but the product gave us enough report context to make that decision quickly.
Fraudmarc CE collected the same report flow through our self-hosted AWS setup and gave us a central rua address across the three domains. Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 parsed correctly, but SendGrid and Mailchimp needed more manual naming before a non-specialist could understand ownership. The DKIM pass on a subdomain was visible, yet the product relied on our process to turn that edge case into a policy recommendation.
User experience
Guidance vs ownership
MyDMARC felt faster; Fraudmarc CE felt more deliberate.
MyDMARC had the smoother path for adding domains, reading aggregate reports, and explaining failures to a domain owner. Fraudmarc CE was usable after deployment, but the AWS setup and manual sender work made each operational handoff slower.
MyDMARC
0/5
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender surfaced clearly
Forwarding explanation was readable
Fraudmarc Community Edition
0/5
Setup required AWS fluency
Unknown sender needed labels
Forwarding took more explanation
With MyDMARC, we added the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in one SaaS workflow, then verified the expected DNS records before reports arrived. Finding the unknown sender took a few drilldowns, but the report context made it clear that this was a classification task, not a product setup problem. The forwarded mail case, where SPF failed but DKIM still helped the message pass, was explainable without exporting raw rows.
With Fraudmarc CE, the experience started with infrastructure rather than the domain wizard. After the AWS deployment was complete, the report views were useful, but the unknown sender needed our own label and the forwarded SPF failure took more explanation for a marketing owner. The product suited an operator who likes owning the stack, less so a team that wants every domain owner guided through the next action.
Support
Vendor help vs community ownership
MyDMARC is the safer support fit; Fraudmarc CE expects technical ownership.
MyDMARC gave us a clearer support path for SaaS setup questions, DNS handoff, and escalation, although priority support was tied to the Pro tier. Fraudmarc CE relied on community support and internal AWS knowledge, which works for technical teams but creates more handoff risk during enforcement planning.
MyDMARC
0/5
DNS handoff was clearer
Priority support only on Pro
Escalation path was visible
Fraudmarc Community Edition
0/5
Community support model
AWS issues stayed ours
Enterprise handoff was indirect
During setup, MyDMARC made the DNS handoff easier because the required DMARC record changes were readable and tied to the hosted workflow. When we staged the support desk sender, the main gap was not detection; it was explaining the SPF and DKIM owner changes to the support team. Enterprise onboarding clarity was limited on public pages, but the product still had a more direct support expectation than a self-hosted build.
Fraudmarc CE pushed support expectations back to our own team. The installation path was documented, but AWS, DNS, and escalation questions were ours to own once reports started flowing. That is acceptable for a technical operator, but an enterprise team that wants formal onboarding, DNS handoff, and escalation should plan that process before rollout.
Suitability
Buyer fit
MyDMARC fits small security teams; Fraudmarc CE fits technical operators.
MyDMARC is the better fit when an SMB wants hosted reporting, clear domain grouping, and a short path to a first enforcement plan. Fraudmarc CE is the better fit when a technical team wants self-hosting, regional control, and no vendor-managed reporting stack. If Suped is on the shortlist, judge it by MSP workflows and alert quality: client grouping, recurring reports, and low-noise alerts should work without extra process.
MyDMARC
0/5
Good SMB domain grouping
Manual client handoff notes
Enterprise controls felt limited
Fraudmarc Community Edition
0/5
Operator-friendly self-hosting
Unlimited domains possible
MSP packaging needed work
MyDMARC worked best for an SMB or small security team managing a handful of domains. Domain grouping was clear enough for our corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain, but account separation and recurring client reporting were not as strong as an MSP would want. For enterprise buyers, the public pricing and setup path were easy to understand, but larger onboarding, delegated owners, and formal handoff needed more confirmation.
Fraudmarc CE suited a technical operator or security team that wants to own the whole reporting path. Unlimited-domain operation is attractive for labs and internal platforms, but MSP delivery needs custom account separation, client handoff notes, and recurring report process. SMBs without AWS confidence will spend too much time on deployment and not enough time moving policy.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
A practical SaaS pick for small DMARC programs
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like the faster path for the primary corporate domain and marketing subdomain. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace separated quickly, SendGrid and Mailchimp were recognizable after sender classification, and the parked domain made the unauthorized spoof sample easy to see.
The friction came when we tried to turn recurring findings into multi-account operations. The unknown sender needed a human label, the support desk sender required a DNS handoff outside the product, and client-style reporting depended on exports and our own notes.
Where it wins
Fast three-domain onboarding
Readable DMARC drilldowns
Clear parked-domain spoof visibility
Public entry pricing
Where it lags
No self-hosted option
Limited MSP account separation
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring absent
Pricing
Free, then $19 / month
Free tier
1 domain, 7 days
Onboarding
Fast SaaS setup
G2 rating
0 / 5
Fraudmarc Community Edition
A self-hosted option for AWS-comfortable operators
Fraudmarc CE felt like an operator-owned DMARC lab that became useful once AWS was configured. The single rua path worked across the three domains, and we liked being able to keep report processing and storage in our own AWS region.
The tradeoff showed up every time a non-specialist needed an answer. The unknown sender needed manual naming, the forwarded SPF failure took a longer explanation, and support handoff meant documenting our own AWS, DNS, and classification decisions.
Where it wins
Self-hosted control
Low software cost
Unlimited domain approach
Data residency control
Where it lags
AWS setup burden
Manual source naming
Community support only
Sparse alert workflow
Pricing
Free software, AWS costs vary
Free tier
Open-source CE
Onboarding
AWS deployment required
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
Fraudmarc Community Edition
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days of retention, and daily parsing.
$0 software
CE is free to run, with typical AWS infrastructure estimated under $5 / month.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers up to 5 monitored domains and 30 days of retention.
$0 software
CE does not publish a message cap; AWS cost changes with usage.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers up to 20 monitored domains, 90 days of retention, and priority email support.
$0 software
CE can cover this domain count, but infrastructure and maintenance remain internal.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public MyDMARC pricing does not show plans above 20 monitored domains.
$0 software
CE has no vendor enterprise tier; AWS cost and maintenance scale with usage.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC's $0, $19, and $49 monthly prices are public list prices. Fraudmarc CE software pricing is public at $0, while AWS cost is an estimate and varies by usage, region, retention, and report volume. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided remediation
MyDMARC surfaced the unknown sender, and Fraudmarc CE exposed the raw pattern, but both still left owner assignment and DNS next steps to our notes. Suped ties source identification to guided fixes so the next action is easier to hand off.
Hosted authentication records
Neither reviewed product covered hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, or hosted MTA-STS in our test. Suped adds managed record workflows for teams that want reporting and record ownership in one place.
Client-ready operations
MyDMARC needed manual client handoff notes, while Fraudmarc CE required custom process around account separation and recurring reports. Suped's MSP workflows are built for grouped clients, repeatable reporting, and cleaner alert routing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or Fraudmarc Community Edition?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
