MyDMARC vs.
EasyDMARC in 2026

MyDMARC gave us usable aggregate DMARC visibility for the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace were recognizable in the daily data, but SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender needed manual notes before we were comfortable moving policy, and the unknown sender sat in review until we traced the IP and DKIM selector outside the product. The SPF pass with visible-from mismatch was visible as a failure pattern, but we had to write our own owner next step.

EasyDMARC had a wider feature set in the same 90-day run. It mapped SendGrid and Mailchimp faster, separated the Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace streams cleanly, and made the forwarded mail with SPF failure easier to explain because the failure context sat close to the pass/fail drilldown. The product also brought managed DMARC, EasySPF, managed MTA-STS, TLS reports, and higher-tier API or SIEM options into the buying conversation, but several advanced controls moved to Premium, Enterprise, or MSP plans.

We added the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in MyDMARC without much friction, then used the report views to watch the first week of traffic. The unknown sender took more work because the UI showed the failing source, but we still had to pivot outside the tool to decide whether it was a vendor, relay, or spoof. The forwarded mail with SPF failure was visible, but the explanation we gave to stakeholders came from our own DMARC notes rather than a guided workflow.

EasyDMARC had more setup surfaces, but the onboarding path made the three-domain rollout easier to sequence. The primary domain and marketing subdomain moved through verification cleanly, the parked domain was simple to monitor for the spoof sample, and the unknown sender was faster to classify because vendor identification and investigation views were closer together. The forwarded SPF failure was easier to explain without losing the reader in raw XML.

During setup, MyDMARC's public material made support expectations simple: Pro named priority email support, while enterprise onboarding, dedicated escalation, and managed DNS handoff were not public. We could copy DNS records and internal notes for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, and the support desk sender, but we did not get an enterprise-style handoff package in the workflow. That worked for a small team, but it added internal writing before policy movement.

EasyDMARC's tiering set clearer expectations for larger buyers. Premium listed email support and a dedicated CS manager on yearly billing, while Enterprise and MSP added a dedicated DMARC engineer and managed services. In the test, the DNS handoff was easier to package for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, but escalation still depended on plan level, and some G2 reviews described difficulty reaching direct support.

MyDMARC fit the SMB side of the test best. It covered a small set of domains cheaply and made sense when one internal owner could review reports, manually classify the support desk sender, and export notes for leadership. It was weaker for MSP or enterprise use because account separation, recurring client reporting, permission groups, and handoff notes were not clearly packaged in the public material or our workflow.

EasyDMARC fit operators with more domains, clients, and controls. The MSP plan added multi-tenant management, white label reporting, PSA/RMM integrations, and private community access, while Enterprise added SSO, audit logs, API, SIEM, Slack, Microsoft Teams, DNS integrations, and dedicated engineer support. The catch is that an SMB with two domains can buy Plus, but the minute our test needed more domains, MSP separation, or formal handoff, the buying path became tier dependent.