MyDMARC vs.
DMARCAnalyzer in 2026
MyDMARC
DMARCAnalyzer
vs.
We tested MyDMARC and DMARCAnalyzer for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MyDMARC was faster to understand and easier to price, while DMARCAnalyzer gave stronger enterprise evidence for source resolution, policy movement, and escalation.
MyDMARC
Self-serve DMARC reporting
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams managing a limited set of domains
In one line
MyDMARC gave us quick report visibility, simple DNS setup, and enough evidence for cautious DMARC policy movement on small domain sets.
DMARCAnalyzer
Enterprise DMARC enforcement
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Security teams that need formal onboarding and enforcement evidence
In one line
DMARCAnalyzer gave us deeper enterprise drilldowns; Suped's product is a useful comparison point when guided fixes and published starter pricing matter.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick MyDMARC for speed, DMARCAnalyzer for enterprise control
Pick MyDMARC if
Best for small teams that want quick DMARC visibility
The three test domains were added quickly, with DNS steps that a general Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace admin could follow.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace sources became readable fast, while SendGrid and Mailchimp needed manual owner labels.
The parked domain spoof sample was easy to isolate, but forwarded SPF failure needed extra explanation.
Free plan available
Pick DMARCAnalyzer if
Best for enterprise teams building an enforcement program
The source drilldowns gave stronger evidence for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic.
The unknown sender was easier to classify because IP, location, and deliverability data were shown together.
The onboarding path fit teams that need DNS handoff, escalation notes, and procurement structure.
Not publicly listed
Consider Suped if
Suped is the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Use guided fixes and automated issue detection as buying criteria when sender ownership cannot depend on manual notes.
Test alert quality with forwarded mail, spoof samples, and unknown senders before committing to an enforcement path.
Check MSP workflows and published starter pricing when client grouping or budget approval affects rollout.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
DMARCAnalyzer
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate reports, source breakdowns, pass and fail drilldowns.
Clear report views with short retention on Free
Deeper filters and longer retention on paid packages
Report analysis with guided issue views
Source detection
How well raw IPs and domains become named senders.
Microsoft 365 named, support desk manual
Google Workspace and Mailchimp clearer
Named sending sources
Forward detection
Whether SPF failures caused by forwarding are separated from spoofing.
Detected, explanation was manual
Detected with cleaner drilldown
Forwarding signals separated
Spoof detection
Unauthorized visible From abuse and policy readiness.
Spoof sample surfaced quickly
Spoof sample tied to enforcement steps
Spoof signals and next steps
Notifications and alerts
Actionable alerts without noisy repeats.
Basic alerts, limited routing
Useful alerts, routing still enterprise-led
Noise-controlled operational alerts
Reporting
Exports, scheduled recaps, and stakeholder summaries.
CSV exports and simple reporting
Stronger recurring reports
Recurring and client-ready reports
API
Documented programmatic access for operations.
Not found in our test
Not tested in public package
API access available
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, client grouping, and access boundaries.
Multi-domain, not full client separation
Account separation, enterprise oriented
Tenant and client grouping
SPF flattening
SPF record management that avoids lookup failures.
Not supported
SPF delegation add on
Hosted SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and changes.
DNS guidance only
Wizard, not hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC records
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting.
Not supported
SPF delegation add on
Hosted SPF records
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS report workflow.
Not supported
TLS reporting, no hosted policy
Hosted MTA-STS
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring and reputation signals.
Not supported
Deliverability data, no blocklist monitor
Blocklist and blacklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Whether the tool flags likely fixes without manual triage.
Basic issue flags
Recommendation engine helped triage
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
Natural language help for diagnosis and next steps.
Not supported
Not found in our test
AI copilot available
DNS monitoring
Checks for record drift and broken authentication DNS.
Record checks during setup
Wizard caught DNS state
DNS monitoring included
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
A no-cost route to test real reports.
Free tier
Free trial
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric using the same three domains, senders, authentication cases, and support tasks. Higher is better in every row.
MyDMARC is stronger on price clarity and setup speed. DMARCAnalyzer is stronger on enforcement evidence.
We gave MyDMARC better pricing transparency because the Free, Basic, and Pro tiers were visible, while DMARCAnalyzer required quote or public estimate validation. DMARCAnalyzer scored higher on source resolution and enforcement planning because the Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp drilldowns had stronger filters and clearer policy steps. MyDMARC lost points where the forwarded SPF failure and support desk sender needed manual explanation, and both products scored 0.0 for blocklist (blacklist) monitoring because neither gave us a working monitor.
MyDMARC score
49.5/100
DMARCAnalyzer score
56.5/100
MyDMARC
49.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
4.5
Alerting and integrations
4.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARCAnalyzer
56.5/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
5.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
3.0
Time to enforcement
7.5
Feature set
Depth vs simplicity
DMARCAnalyzer has deeper enterprise coverage. MyDMARC is easier to operate.
DMARCAnalyzer had the broader enforcement toolkit in our 90-day test, especially for source drilldowns, forensic and TLS reporting, and the SPF delegation add-on. MyDMARC was lighter and easier to read for the three-domain setup, but it left more sender ownership work to us. Suped's product is relevant as a buying criterion here: guided fixes and automated issue detection should be tested against the same Microsoft 365, SendGrid, and forwarded-mail cases.
MyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
SendGrid needed owner tagging
SPF mismatch was visible
DMARCAnalyzer
Google Workspace filters were stronger
Mailchimp grouped by source
Forwarded SPF explained better
MyDMARC handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly after DNS setup, and the DKIM pass with matching domain was easy to confirm. SendGrid and Mailchimp appeared as separate senders, but the support desk sender landed in a less obvious cluster until we labelled it. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch was visible in the report data, yet the product did not give a strong next-step explanation beyond manual classification.
DMARCAnalyzer gave stronger source evidence for Google Workspace, Mailchimp, and SendGrid, with filters that let us move from IP ranges to sending services faster. The unknown sender was easier to classify because the console showed location, IP, and deliverability data together. In the forwarded mail SPF failure, the tool separated SPF failure evidence from DKIM pass evidence more clearly than MyDMARC.
User experience
Speed vs control
MyDMARC is quicker to learn. DMARCAnalyzer gives more control once configured.
MyDMARC felt faster during initial setup because the workflow kept the three domains in a simple queue. DMARCAnalyzer took longer to configure, but the drilldowns reduced the time spent proving why a forwarded message failed SPF while DKIM still passed.
MyDMARC
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender needed manual review
Forwarding explanation was thin
DMARCAnalyzer
Setup took more choices
Unknown sender evidence was clearer
Forwarding story was cleaner
We added the primary corporate domain first, then the marketing subdomain and parked domain, and the DNS steps were short enough for a non-specialist admin to follow. The unknown sender was visible after reports arrived, but we had to compare IPs and headers manually before assigning it to the support desk sender. The forwarded SPF failure needed a written note from us because the interface showed the failure but did not package the explanation for stakeholders.
DMARCAnalyzer required more setup choices and felt heavier during the first week, especially when adding all three domains and approved senders. Once data was flowing, the unknown sender investigation was stronger because location, IP, and source details sat in one drilldown. The forwarded SPF failure was easier to explain because the DKIM pass and SPF fail evidence stayed visible in the same workflow.
Support
Self serve vs guided onboarding
MyDMARC suits lighter self-serve support. DMARCAnalyzer has clearer enterprise escalation.
MyDMARC gave us enough setup direction for DNS record creation and report intake, but support expectations were mostly tied to plan level. DMARCAnalyzer was better suited to procurement, implementation, and escalation handoff, although that made simple questions feel slower.
MyDMARC
DNS handoff was simple
Priority support on Pro
Escalation notes needed writing
DMARCAnalyzer
Enterprise onboarding was clearer
Managed help can be added
Package clarity was weaker
For MyDMARC, the DNS handoff for the primary domain and marketing subdomain was easy to copy into a ticket, and the parked domain needed almost no extra explanation. When the support desk sender failed classification, the product gave us the evidence but not a ready escalation note. Priority email support was tied to Pro in the public plan, so teams on lower tiers should expect more self-service work.
For DMARCAnalyzer, the setup path matched enterprise onboarding better because domain packages, add-ons, and managed help were part of the buying path. DNS handoff was clearer for teams that need approvals, and escalation notes had more supporting evidence from source drilldowns. The tradeoff was pricing and package clarity, since small teams need a quote or trial path before they know the real commitment.
Suitability
SMB fit vs enterprise fit
MyDMARC fits smaller teams. DMARCAnalyzer fits enterprise DMARC programs.
MyDMARC is the clearer fit when the buyer has a small domain set, wants visible monthly pricing, and can tolerate manual sender ownership. DMARCAnalyzer is the better fit when procurement, long retention, enterprise onboarding, and managed enforcement help matter more than self-serve speed. Suped's product is relevant as a buying criterion for MSP workflows and alert quality: test client grouping, recurring reports, and alert routing before treating domain count as the main decision.
MyDMARC
Best for SMB ownership
Exports over client packs
Public pricing helps planning
DMARCAnalyzer
Enterprise package fit
Long retention available
MSP handoff felt heavier
MyDMARC worked best for our primary corporate domain and marketing subdomain when one admin owned the DNS changes and sender labels. Account separation was not strong enough for a busy MSP handoff, and recurring reporting felt closer to a simple export workflow than a client-ready review pack. For SMB buyers, the public Free, Basic, and Pro pricing made planning easier.
DMARCAnalyzer fit the enterprise side of the test better because account separation, longer retention, and add-on support mapped to a formal security program. It was less natural for an MSP that needs fast client switching and lightweight recurring reports across many small accounts. For a large company, the ability to connect policy movement with source evidence made the heavier setup easier to justify.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
A fast reporting fit for smaller domain portfolios
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like a practical reporting tool for a small team that wants to see who is sending mail and move policy carefully. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became understandable quickly, and the parked domain was easy to watch for spoofing because legitimate mail volume was low.
The weak spot was ownership work. SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender needed manual labels, and the unknown sender took a header review before we were confident enough to classify it. The forwarded SPF failure also needed extra explanation outside the product.
Where it wins
Fast setup for the primary domain
Public Free, Basic, and Pro pricing
Simple spoof review on parked domain
Readable report drilldowns
Where it lags
Manual sender ownership work
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Limited MSP account separation
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Pricing
$0, paid from $19 / month
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast for three domains
G2 rating
0 / 5
DMARCAnalyzer
A structured fit for enterprise enforcement programs
After 90 days, DMARCAnalyzer felt built for a formal enforcement program. The setup took longer, but the drilldowns gave us better evidence when separating Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp traffic.
It was strongest when we needed to explain edge cases to a security or infrastructure team. The forwarded SPF failure, DKIM pass on a subdomain, and unauthorized spoof sample all had enough evidence for a policy discussion. It was weaker for quick buying decisions because current public pages did not give a complete price table.
Where it wins
Stronger source drilldowns
Good enterprise enforcement evidence
Longer retention packages
SPF delegation add-on available
Where it lags
Pricing needs quote validation
Setup felt heavier
MSP handoff less natural
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
Free trial
Onboarding
Heavier, more structured
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
DMARCAnalyzer
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days retention, and daily parsing.
From about $5,000 / year
Fundamentals public listing data covers 5 active domains and far more volume than this segment.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers 5 monitored domains and hourly parsing; email volume cap was not published.
From about $5,000 / year
Fundamentals still appears to be the nearest public planning estimate for this size.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 monitored domains, 90 days retention, and near real-time parsing.
From about $19,250 / year
Planning estimate for a lower public band with 6 to 10 active domains.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Official public tiers stopped at 20 monitored domains, with no enterprise price exposed.
From about $22,500 / year
Planning estimate for a lower public band; larger or higher-ranked domains cost more.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC prices are public official monthly list prices checked as of May 15, 2026. DMARCAnalyzer amounts are estimates from public listings because current official pages did not publish complete list prices. Exact DMARCAnalyzer pricing needs buyer-specific validation.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Turn findings into fixes
MyDMARC showed the failing sources, but the support desk sender and forwarded SPF case still needed manual explanation. Suped ties issues to guided DNS and ownership steps.
Keep pricing easier to plan
DMARCAnalyzer had strong enterprise evidence, but public pricing was hard to model. Suped publishes starter pricing so smaller teams can budget before a sales process.
Make client handoff cleaner
Both products needed extra work for MSP-style recurring reports and client notes. Suped keeps account grouping, alert routing, and handoff context closer to the reporting workflow.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or DMARCAnalyzer?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
