MyDMARC vs.
DMARC Visualizer in 2026
MyDMARC
DMARC Visualizer
vs.
We tested both products for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. MyDMARC was the more practical hosted path to policy movement, while DMARC Visualizer was better for teams that want self-hosted raw reporting and can own the operations work.
MyDMARC
Hosted DMARC reporting for SMBs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
SMB and lean IT teams that want a hosted reporting workflow
In one line
MyDMARC got the three test domains into a usable SaaS workflow quickly, but deeper MSP separation and hosted authentication records were missing.
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosted DMARC reporting stack
Starts at
$0 software cost
Best fit
Technical teams that want Grafana dashboards and control their own infrastructure
In one line
DMARC Visualizer exposed the raw report data well, but classification, alerts, retention, and handoff work stayed with the operator.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Use MyDMARC for hosted reporting, DMARC Visualizer for self-hosted control
Pick MyDMARC if
Choose MyDMARC if you want hosted DMARC reporting without running infrastructure
The three test domains were active the same day after publishing the reporting address.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became recognizable sources after reports arrived.
The parked-domain spoof sample was easy to isolate against the low-traffic baseline.
Free plan available
Pick DMARC Visualizer if
Choose DMARC Visualizer if a technical owner wants self-hosted DMARC data
Parsed reports flowed into Grafana once we configured ingestion and storage.
SendGrid and Mailchimp could be inspected at query level without SaaS abstraction.
Retention and access control were under our control, with maintenance attached.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should connect each sender failure to DNS changes and ownership, not only show pass/fail rows.
Automated issue detection should separate spoof samples, forwarded mail, and misconfigured vendors before alerts fire.
Published starter pricing should make the first 2-domain, 100k-message step visible before procurement.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
MyDMARC
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate XML reports become searchable review data.
Hosted analysis
Self-hosted analysis
DMARC reports with source grouping
Source detection
Sending services are identified well enough for ownership decisions.
Recognizable senders with notes
Manual workflow
Sender identification and ownership
Forward detection
Forwarded mail patterns are separated from true failures.
Partial
Manual inference
Forwarding patterns flagged
Spoof detection
Unauthorized sources can be isolated from approved senders.
Clear on parked domain
Query-based
Unauthorized sources highlighted
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts reach the right owner with useful context.
Email alerts
Not packaged
Configurable alerts
Reporting
Reports can be used for recurring review and stakeholder updates.
Domain reports
Grafana reporting
Scheduled exports and summaries
API
Programmatic access exists for operations or integration work.
Not publicly found
Operator-managed APIs
API available
Multi-tenancy
Accounts, clients, or business units can be separated cleanly.
Manual domain grouping
Manual Grafana setup
MSP account separation
SPF flattening
The product manages SPF DNS lookup limits.
Not included
Not included
Hosted SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
DMARC records can be hosted and changed inside the workflow.
DNS instructions only
Not included
Hosted DMARC records
Hosted SPF
SPF records can be hosted and maintained by the product.
Not included
Not included
Hosted SPF records
Hosted MTA-STS
MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting are handled in the product.
Not included
Not included
Hosted MTA-STS and TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and sender reputation checks are part of monitoring.
Not publicly found
Not included
Blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Automatic issue detection
The product turns report patterns into concrete issues.
Guidance-based
Manual workflow
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or triage is available inside the workflow.
Not found
Not included
AI-assisted guidance
DNS monitoring
Authentication records are checked for changes or breakage.
Record checks
Not included
DNS change monitoring
Self hostable
The product can run in the buyer's own infrastructure.
Hosted SaaS
Self-hosted
Hosted SaaS
Free trial/free tier
A buyer can start without a paid subscription.
Free tier
Free software
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored each product against a fixed editorial rubric based on the same 90-day test setup. Higher is better in every row, and a score of 0.0 means the capability was not supported in the tested product.
MyDMARC scored higher on managed enforcement, while DMARC Visualizer scored higher on self-hosted control.
MyDMARC moved faster once the three domains were sending aggregate reports, and it gave us a clearer path to review approved senders before policy changes. DMARC Visualizer gave us more direct access to raw report data, but source ownership, unknown sender classification, alerts, and enforcement planning all depended on our own process. Both products scored 0.0 for hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, and blocklist (blacklist) monitoring because those capabilities were not present in the tested workflow.
MyDMARC score
47/100
DMARC Visualizer score
23.5/100
MyDMARC
47/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
3.0
Alerting and integrations
4.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
DMARC Visualizer
23.5/100
DMARC enforcement
3.5
Customer support
1.0
Source resolution
4.0
Setup and onboarding
4.0
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
0.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.0
Time to enforcement
3.0
Feature set
Managed workflow vs raw control
MyDMARC covers more of the managed DMARC job. DMARC Visualizer gives operators the raw data.
MyDMARC has the broader managed DMARC workflow, especially for policy movement and sender review. DMARC Visualizer gives stronger raw-data access for teams willing to run the stack. Suped is a useful comparison point for guided fixes and automated issue detection, because both tools left part of the unknown sender and forwarded-mail analysis to the operator.
MyDMARC
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Mailchimp needed owner notes
Forwarded SPF needed review
DMARC Visualizer
Grafana exposed raw source IPs
SendGrid queries were quick
Unknown sender stayed manual
MyDMARC covered the common SaaS path well. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as recognizable senders after reports arrived, SendGrid and Mailchimp needed a manual owner note to make the dashboard useful, and the unknown support desk sender was easier to classify once we tied its IP range to the helpdesk vendor. The DKIM pass on a subdomain was visible, but the product did not turn that edge case into a clear enforcement task without our own notes.
DMARC Visualizer gave us raw control through parsedmarc, Elasticsearch, and Grafana. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp were all visible once the report files were processed, but sender names, owner tags, and the unknown source classification depended on our Grafana queries and notes. The forwarded mail SPF failure was clear as an authentication pattern, yet it remained an operator interpretation rather than a workflow item.
User experience
Guided SaaS vs operator console
MyDMARC is faster for hosted review. DMARC Visualizer rewards technical ownership.
MyDMARC is easier to operate if the buyer wants a working SaaS flow. DMARC Visualizer is more comfortable for an operator who already knows how to shape Grafana, ingestion, and retention. The tradeoff is speed versus control.
MyDMARC
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender took cross-checks
Forwarding needed plain explanation
DMARC Visualizer
Docker setup needs ownership
Raw queries find senders
Handoff notes stay manual
Adding the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in MyDMARC was a familiar SaaS setup: publish the reporting address, wait for aggregate reports, then work through senders. The unknown sender took several screens to confirm because we had to compare report rows with our support desk logs, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was visible but needed a human explanation for a non-technical owner.
DMARC Visualizer took more setup time because the Docker stack, mailbox and report ingestion, Elasticsearch storage, and Grafana dashboards all needed owner decisions before review work started. Once it was running, finding the unknown sender was direct for a technical user, but explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure to a marketing or support owner required a separate handoff note.
Support
Support path vs self support
MyDMARC has a clearer support path. DMARC Visualizer depends on internal owners.
MyDMARC is more suitable when a buyer wants support expectations tied to a hosted product. DMARC Visualizer is workable when the team can own setup, DNS handoff, parser issues, and escalation internally. Enterprise buyers should verify onboarding, SLA, and account-management needs before relying on either option.
MyDMARC
DNS handoff was clearer
Priority email on Pro
Enterprise path stayed unclear
DMARC Visualizer
No commercial SLA found
Setup owned by operator
Escalation is internal
MyDMARC had the clearer support path for a paid buyer. During setup, DNS instructions were easy to hand to an admin, Pro listed priority email support, and escalation felt viable for a team moving toward quarantine, although enterprise onboarding, SLAs, and dedicated account management were not publicly listed in the pricing material we reviewed.
DMARC Visualizer had no commercial support path in the public project materials we tested against. DNS handoff, parser errors, Elasticsearch storage, Grafana access, and escalation all sat with our own technical owner, which is acceptable for an engineering-led team but weak for a buyer expecting onboarding.
Suitability
Hosted buyer vs technical operator
MyDMARC suits SaaS buyers. DMARC Visualizer suits engineering-led teams.
MyDMARC is the better fit when a company wants a hosted DMARC workflow with basic sender review and policy steps. DMARC Visualizer is the better fit when the buyer values self-hosting and can own ingestion, storage, and dashboards. Suped is relevant as a comparison point for MSP workflows and alert quality: the buyer should check whether the tool can separate accounts, route noisy authentication changes, and produce client handoff notes without manual rebuilds.
MyDMARC
SMB hosted fit
Domain grouping beats clients
Handoff notes still needed
DMARC Visualizer
Engineering teams fit best
Client reporting is manual
Self-hosting controls retention
For an SMB or lean IT team, MyDMARC made the three-domain test easier to govern than a self-hosted stack. Account separation did not feel like a true MSP layer, recurring reporting worked as a domain-level artifact, and client handoff still needed our notes for the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure.
DMARC Visualizer fit the operator who wants to own every part of the system. Grafana can be separated with careful configuration, but client grouping, recurring reports, and handoff notes were not packaged workflows, so MSP and enterprise use would require maintenance around the project.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
MyDMARC
Hosted DMARC reporting for teams that want progress without running a stack
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt like a practical hosted DMARC tool for the primary domain and marketing subdomain. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace settled into recognizable sender groups, while SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender needed owner notes so future reports made sense.
The parked domain was where the product helped most, because the unauthorized spoof sample stood out quickly against low legitimate traffic. The weakness was operational depth: the forwarded mail SPF failure, subdomain DKIM pass, and unknown sender classification still needed our written explanation before a domain owner could act.
Where it wins
Public Free, Basic, and Pro tiers
Fast SaaS setup for three domains
Clear spoof review on parked domain
Practical policy movement prompts
Where it lags
Limited public enterprise packaging
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
MSP account separation felt thin
Unknown sender notes stayed manual
Pricing
Free, then $19 / month
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Same day
G2 rating
0 / 5
DMARC Visualizer
Self-hosted reporting for technical teams that want direct control
After 90 days, DMARC Visualizer felt like a transparent lab and operations stack rather than a packaged monitoring product. Once parsedmarc loaded the aggregate reports, Grafana made it easy to inspect Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp patterns at the query level.
The cost was ownership. We had to maintain ingestion, storage, access control, and retention, and the unauthorized spoof sample, forwarded mail SPF failure, and unknown support desk sender all needed our own classification workflow before they became actions.
Where it wins
$0 software cost
Full control of raw data
Grafana dashboards are flexible
Retention depends on your storage
Where it lags
No managed onboarding
No packaged alerts
No hosted authentication records
Classification remains manual
Pricing
Free self-hosted software
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Several days
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
MyDMARC
DMARC Visualizer
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days retention, and daily parsing.
$0 software cost
Runs as self-hosted software; infrastructure and staff time are outside the project price.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$19 / month
Basic covers up to 5 domains with 30 days retention and hourly parsing.
$0 software cost
No vendor volume tiers were found; Elasticsearch storage and retention set the real limit.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers up to 20 domains with 90 days retention, near real-time parsing, and priority email support.
$0 software cost
Higher report volume needs more hosting capacity and cleanup policy work.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No public plan above 20 monitored domains was listed as of May 15, 2026.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
No commercial enterprise plan, SLA, or managed onboarding package was found.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MyDMARC prices are public list prices for Free, Basic, and Pro. DMARC Visualizer is listed as $0 self-hosted software, so hosting, storage, backups, and staff time are estimates outside product pricing; pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided sender fixes
MyDMARC identified the unknown support desk sender only after our manual cross-checks, while DMARC Visualizer left classification to Grafana queries. Suped's workflow ties a source to likely owners and recommended DNS or vendor changes.
Hosted records
Both reviewed products left SPF flattening, hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS outside the tested workflow. Suped can host and monitor those records so the same team that reviews reports can apply the fix.
MSP-ready handoff
MyDMARC's domain grouping did not act like full client separation, and DMARC Visualizer needed manual reports for every client view. Suped has MSP workflows for account separation, recurring reporting, and client notes.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MyDMARC or DMARC Visualizer?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
