Suped

MyDMARC vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Choose MyDMARC for a straightforward DMARC solution, or Centera DMARC Compliance for advanced enterprise needs.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MyDMARC offers a core set of features designed to help us get started with DMARC easily. It provides clear visibility into email authentication, allowing us to see which sources are passing or failing SPF and DKIM. The platform focuses on simplifying complex DMARC data, making it accessible even for those new to email security.
We find its strength in providing actionable insights quickly. It helps us identify legitimate senders and potential spoofing attempts without getting bogged down in excessive detail. While it covers the fundamentals comprehensively, it might lean towards a more focused feature set compared to broader security platforms.
Centera DMARC Compliance presents a more robust and granular feature set, catering to organizations with complex email ecosystems. It excels in offering deep analytical tools, allowing us to drill down into specific IP addresses, sending sources, and geopolitical origins of email traffic. This level of detail is invaluable for forensic analysis and fine-tuning DMARC policies at scale.
Its capabilities extend to advanced policy enforcement and integration with other security layers. We appreciate its ability to handle intricate forwarding scenarios and provide extensive reporting options. For those who require comprehensive control and detailed data exploration, Centera DMARC Compliance certainly delivers.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MyDMARC generally offers a clean and intuitive user interface, making DMARC reporting relatively easy to navigate. The dashboard provides a good overview of our DMARC status, with charts and graphs that simplify complex data. We've found that getting started and understanding the basics is quite straightforward, ideal for users who prefer a less cluttered approach.
However, for more in-depth investigations or advanced configurations, we sometimes wish for quicker access to specific data points without extra clicks. The experience prioritizes simplicity, which is a double-edged sword when we need to dive deep into anomalies or unusual traffic patterns. It's user-friendly for routine monitoring.
Centera DMARC Compliance provides a powerful user experience with a wealth of options and granular controls, which can be both a blessing and a slight curse. The depth of data and configurability means there's a learning curve, but once mastered, it offers immense flexibility. We appreciate the ability to customize views and reports extensively, tailoring the platform to our specific needs.
While its interface is functional, it can feel a bit dense initially, especially for new users. The sheer volume of information can be overwhelming, but for those who manage multiple domains or complex sending architectures, the comprehensive controls become indispensable. It's designed for power users who know what they're looking for.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MyDMARC provides support primarily through email, with priority support for their Pro plan users. We've found their responses to be generally helpful and timely for standard DMARC inquiries. Their knowledge base is also a good resource for common questions and setup guides, which helps with self-service.
For urgent or highly technical issues, the asynchronous nature of email support means some delays might occur, which is a consideration for organizations requiring immediate assistance. Overall, the support experience is solid for typical DMARC management, keeping us afloat without major issues.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers comprehensive support options, often including dedicated account managers or more direct lines of communication for enterprise clients. We've experienced their support team to be knowledgeable and capable of assisting with complex DMARC deployments and troubleshooting specific email flow issues, which is crucial for larger operations.
The level of support can vary depending on the service tier, but for organizations with critical DMARC enforcement needs, the responsive and expert assistance is a significant advantage. They seem well-equipped to guide through advanced configurations and mitigate potential deliverability problems.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
MyDMARC is well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that are just beginning their DMARC journey. Its ease of use and focused feature set make it an excellent choice for getting DMARC implemented without excessive complexity. For MSPs, it could serve as a foundational tool for clients with simpler email setups.
However, for large enterprises with intricate email infrastructure or MSPs managing a vast array of diverse client needs, MyDMARC might lack some of the advanced features and scalability required for comprehensive management. It's a great starting point, but enterprises might find themselves hitting a ceiling.
Centera DMARC Compliance is an ideal solution for large enterprises and MSPs who require a robust, scalable, and highly customizable DMARC reporting and enforcement platform. Its deep analytical capabilities and advanced features are designed to handle complex multi-domain environments and provide the forensic detail necessary for sophisticated threat detection.
For SMBs, Centera DMARC Compliance might offer more functionality than immediately needed, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve or an over-engineered solution. However, for MSPs managing security for numerous clients, its multi-tenancy and extensive reporting tools make it a powerful asset for offering managed DMARC services.

How does MyDMARC compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When evaluating MyDMARC, we noted that while its user-friendliness is a strong point, the platform can sometimes feel limited for very large or complex email environments, potentially lacking the deep-dive analytics needed for extensive forensic work. Centera DMARC Compliance, conversely, offers powerful functionality but presents a steeper learning curve, and its complexity might be overkill for smaller businesses. Additionally, Centera's pricing information is not readily transparent, which can be a hurdle for initial assessments.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

MyDMARC provides transparent tiered pricing with a generous free plan, while Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for pricing details.
Logo
Logo
Small
Free (1 domain, 7-day retention) or $19/mo (5 domains, 30-day retention)
Contact for pricing
Medium
Pro plan $49/mo (20 domains, 90-day retention)
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for custom enterprise solutions
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for custom enterprise solutions
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with MyDMARC or Centera DMARC Compliance?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions