Suped

MXtoolbox vs.
SimpleDMARC in 2026

MXtoolbox dashboard screenshot
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
SimpleDMARC dashboard screenshot
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
vs.
We tested MXtoolbox and SimpleDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. MXtoolbox felt strongest when DMARC reporting sat beside blacklist checks, DNS diagnostics, and delivery monitoring, while SimpleDMARC was easier for a lean team to move through DMARC monitoring without extra deliverability tooling. The practical verdict: choose MXtoolbox for wider email operations visibility, and choose SimpleDMARC for simpler DMARC-first workflows at lower published entry prices.
Published 5 Nov 2025
Updated 2 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
DMARC reporting with delivery diagnostics
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams that want DMARC, DNS, blacklist, and mailflow checks in one account
In one line
MXtoolbox gave us the broadest operational view, but DMARC enforcement work still required technical judgment and manual follow-through.
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
DMARC monitoring for SMBs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams that want low-cost DMARC visibility without a wider deliverability suite
In one line
SimpleDMARC was faster to understand for a small domain set, but it exposed less adjacent reputation and delivery context during edge-case triage.
suped.com logo
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped

Pick MXtoolbox for breadth, SimpleDMARC for DMARC-first simplicity

Pick MXtoolbox if
Best for teams that already treat deliverability as an operational queue
Linked our parked-domain spoof sample to domain impersonation checks and reputation monitoring instead of leaving it inside DMARC reporting only.
Made Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace DNS validation quick because the same account already exposed MX, SPF, DKIM, and blacklist diagnostics.
Handled SendGrid and Mailchimp volume well on the paid tier, although we still had to translate several findings into owner tasks ourselves.
Free plan available
Pick SimpleDMARC if
Best for small teams that want a focused DMARC console
Set up the primary domain and marketing subdomain with less navigation, and the free tier made the parked-domain test inexpensive.
Classified Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp cleanly after we corrected labels during the first report cycle.
Explained aligned SPF and DKIM results clearly, but the forwarded SPF failure needed more operator interpretation than we wanted.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Use Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter more
Look for guided fixes that turn unknown senders and failed alignment into exact owner tasks instead of report rows that still need translation.
Automated issue detection should flag new spoofing, forwarding noise, and sender drift without forcing daily manual review.
For MSP or multi-domain work, published starter pricing and client-level separation reduce handoff friction.
Free plan available

The differences that actually change your week

mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, domain-level authentication trends, and drilldowns.
Paid tier
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Identification of sending services behind DMARC traffic.
Manual workflow
Partial
Supported
Forward detection
Ability to separate forwarded-mail SPF failure from real authentication risk.
Manual workflow
Partial
Supported
Spoof detection
Detection of unauthorized use of a protected visible From domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for authentication, reputation, and monitoring changes.
Supported
Email alerts
Supported
Reporting
Scheduled, exportable, or recurring reports for stakeholders.
Supported
Plan-based cadence
Supported
API
Programmatic access for pulling monitoring or report data.
Paid tier
Unclear
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for multiple clients, brands, or business units.
Manual workflow
Partial
Supported
SPF flattening
Help reducing SPF DNS lookup risk.
Plus tier
Enterprise
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and policy updates.
Not tested
Not tested
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting and update workflow.
SPF flattening only
Enterprise
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted policy and reporting workflow for MTA-STS.
Not supported
Coming soon
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blacklist and blocklist monitoring plus sender reputation context.
Supported
Not supported
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic surfacing of problems that need action.
Partial
Partial
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or remediation guidance.
Not supported
Not supported
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing monitoring for DNS and authentication-record changes.
Supported
Partial
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
Not supported
Not supported
Not supported
Free trial/free tier
Public free option or trial path.
Free tier
Free tier
Free tier

Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10

We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric built around DMARC enforcement, sender resolution, setup, support, alerts, hosted authentication, blocklist coverage, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement. Higher is better in every row.

MXtoolbox scores higher on adjacent deliverability coverage, while SimpleDMARC scores higher on low-friction DMARC setup.

MXtoolbox earned stronger scores where DMARC reporting touched DNS diagnostics, blacklist (blocklist) checks, mailflow monitoring, and complaint signals. SimpleDMARC scored better on onboarding speed and pricing clarity for small domain sets, but it lost ground when we needed broader reputation context, hosted MTA-STS, and deeper operational alerts. Neither product removed all manual work around the forwarded SPF failure or the unknown sender classification.
MXtoolbox score
66.5/100
SimpleDMARC score
58/100
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
66.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
7.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
4.0
Blocklist monitoring
9.0
Pricing transparency
6.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
58/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
6.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
3.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.5

Feature set

Breadth vs focus

MXtoolbox wins on operational breadth. SimpleDMARC wins on focused DMARC coverage.

MXtoolbox gave us more surrounding evidence when DMARC issues touched DNS, blacklist (blocklist) status, complaints, and sender reputation. SimpleDMARC kept the work centered on DMARC monitoring and plan-based reporting, which made it easier to explain to a small team. For buyers comparing both, guided fixes and automated issue detection should sit high on the checklist because both products left some translation work after the unknown sender and forwarded SPF case.
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
MXtoolbox screenshot
Microsoft 365 DNS checks
Mailchimp reputation context
Spoof sample surfaced fast
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Google Workspace clarity
SendGrid labels corrected
Forwarding needed interpretation
MXtoolbox connected our Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace setup checks to DNS diagnostics quickly, then added useful context for SendGrid and Mailchimp through delivery monitoring, sender reputation, and blacklist checks. In the unauthorized spoof sample against the parked domain, the impersonation and reputation views helped confirm that the problem was a real spoofing issue rather than a failing DMARC row alone, although the product still expected us to decide the exact owner and remediation path. The unknown support desk sender was visible in reporting, but classification took manual comparison against headers and vendor documentation.
SimpleDMARC handled the core DMARC flow with less surrounding noise. Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp appeared in a clearer DMARC-first report trail after the first few aggregate reports, and aligned SPF plus aligned DKIM cases were easy to confirm. The SPF pass with visible From mismatch and DKIM pass on a subdomain were understandable, but the forwarded mail SPF failure needed more explanation outside the report because reputation and delivery context were thinner.

User experience

Control vs guidance

MXtoolbox asks for more operator judgment. SimpleDMARC is easier to keep in one lane.

MXtoolbox worked best when a technical user knew which diagnostic path to open after a DMARC finding. SimpleDMARC was easier to use for routine DMARC review, especially across our three test domains, but it had fewer clues when an edge case needed explanation.
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
MXtoolbox screenshot
Fast DNS verification
Unknown sender took clicks
Forwarding visible, not obvious
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Three domains added cleanly
Unknown sender stayed visible
Forwarding needed explanation
Onboarding the primary corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in MXtoolbox was straightforward once we knew where each diagnostic lived. The DNS setup checks were useful for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace, and we could jump into related lookups when something looked wrong. Finding the unknown sender took more clicks than expected because the useful evidence lived across DMARC report data, headers, and adjacent diagnostics, and the forwarded SPF failure was technically visible before it was operationally clear.
SimpleDMARC had the cleaner path for adding the three test domains and checking whether aggregate reports were flowing. The unknown sender was easier to keep in view inside the reporting workflow, and the product was less distracting for a team focused only on DMARC. The tradeoff appeared when we explained the forwarded SPF failure to a non-specialist: the result was present, but the surrounding reasoning and next action still needed our own write-up.

Support

Expert help vs plan clarity

MXtoolbox has the stronger expert-support path. SimpleDMARC is clearer for routine self-service.

MXtoolbox was the better fit when we needed a support conversation around DNS handoff, SPF flattening, and a path toward enforcement. SimpleDMARC made basic plan expectations easier to understand, but advanced support and enterprise onboarding depended more heavily on plan level.
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
MXtoolbox screenshot
Dedicated support on Plus
DNS handoff was stronger
Managed option exists
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
Support tiers are clear
Priority support starts lower
Enterprise help plan-based
MXtoolbox's support story was strongest around paid Delivery Center Plus and managed service expectations. During setup, the DNS handoff for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace was easier to package for an IT admin because the product exposed the required authentication checks beside broader diagnostics. Escalation made the most sense for teams that want help moving toward quarantine or reject, but smaller teams must factor in the jump from self-service pricing to dedicated expert help.
SimpleDMARC's support levels were easier to map because the public plans separate basic, standard, priority, and dedicated support. For our test, routine questions around adding the parked domain and checking report cadence were easy to answer from the product flow. The harder handoff was enterprise-style onboarding: when the support desk sender and forwarded mail case needed explanation for non-technical stakeholders, the available workflow felt more self-service unless the buyer moved into a higher plan.

Suitability

Operations fit vs SMB fit

MXtoolbox suits technical operations teams. SimpleDMARC suits smaller DMARC-focused teams.

MXtoolbox fit the team that wants one place for DMARC, blacklist monitoring, diagnostics, and delivery checks, especially when a technical owner can work the queue. SimpleDMARC fit the team that wants clear DMARC monitoring with predictable public pricing and fewer adjacent tools. For MSPs and agencies, the deciding criteria should include clean client separation, recurring reporting, handoff notes, and alert quality because both products needed extra process around multi-client ownership.
mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
MXtoolbox screenshot
Enterprise operators fit best
Client handoff needs notes
Recurring reports useful
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
SimpleDMARC screenshot
SMB fit is clearer
Plan cadence maps well
MSP separation is partial
MXtoolbox was easier to justify for an enterprise or technical operations team that already owns DNS, mailflow, and reputation monitoring. Account separation and domain grouping worked for our three-domain setup, but MSP-style handoff required naming conventions, exported reports, and external notes to show which client or business unit owned each sender. Recurring reporting was useful, yet the workflow felt built around operators rather than client-facing service delivery.
SimpleDMARC was a cleaner fit for SMB buyers and smaller IT teams that need to monitor a few domains without taking on a full deliverability operations stack. Domain grouping across the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was easier to explain, and report cadence mapped well to plan tiers. For MSP use, we still wanted stronger client-level separation, reusable handoff notes, and alert routing that separated urgent spoofing from routine authentication drift.

What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use

mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox

Best when DMARC sits inside a wider email operations routine

After 90 days, MXtoolbox felt like a tool for people who already investigate mail problems. The Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace setup checks were quick, SendGrid and Mailchimp traffic had enough context to diagnose sender health, and the parked-domain spoof sample was easier to triage because reputation and blacklist data were nearby.
The product also asked us to do more interpretation. The unknown support desk sender appeared in the data, but we had to connect it to the vendor owner, document the source, and decide the policy movement ourselves. The forwarded SPF failure was visible, but explaining why DKIM alignment kept the message acceptable still required technical translation.
Where it wins
Strong DNS and authentication diagnostics
Useful blacklist and blocklist monitoring
Good fit for deliverability operators
Helpful path to expert support
Where it lags
DMARC tasks can feel scattered
Unknown senders need manual ownership
Published add-on pricing is incomplete
MSP handoff needs outside process
Pricing
From $129 / month
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Moderate
G2 rating
4.1 / 5
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC

Best when the job is focused DMARC monitoring for a small domain set

After 90 days, SimpleDMARC felt easier to keep in front of a small team. Adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was clear, and Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp became understandable once we corrected the first sender labels.
The narrower product shape helped routine review but hurt deeper investigation. The unknown sender was easier to find inside the DMARC flow, yet the forwarded SPF failure and visible From mismatch still needed explanation. The lack of built-in blacklist (blocklist) and reputation monitoring meant we had to separate DMARC enforcement work from sender reputation work.
Where it wins
Fast small-domain onboarding
Clear public plan limits
Focused DMARC reporting flow
Low annual entry price
Where it lags
No blocklist monitoring in test
Forwarded mail needs explanation
Enterprise tier jumps sharply
Limited adjacent delivery context
Pricing
From $99 / year
Free tier
Yes
Onboarding
Fast
G2 rating
4.0 / 5

Pricing

mxtoolbox.com logo
MXtoolbox
simpledmarc.com logo
SimpleDMARC
suped.com logo
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free monitoring covers one domain or IP for weekly blacklist checks, not full DMARC reporting.
$0
Free plan covers one active domain and 10,000 emails per month.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$129 / month
Delivery Center covers up to five domains and 500,000 messages per month.
$149 / year
Small plan covers two active domains, two passive domains, and 100,000 emails per month.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Self-serve plans publish five-domain limits, and add-on domain pricing was not public.
$14,999 / year
Enterprise is the public plan that reaches 1 million plus emails and up to 100 active domains.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Managed Email Delivery Services are described publicly, but fixed annual pricing is not listed.
$14,999 / year
Enterprise lists 100 active domains, 100 passive domains, and 1 million plus emails per month.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
MXtoolbox Free, Delivery Center at $129 per month, and Delivery Center Plus at $399 per month are public list prices, while larger domain scenarios are estimated because add-on domain pricing was not published. SimpleDMARC Free, Small at $149 per year, and Enterprise at $14,999 per year are public annual prices. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.

If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped

Suped dashboard
Unknown sender ownership
In our MXtoolbox test, the unknown support desk sender was visible but still needed manual owner mapping. Suped is built to turn that kind of source into a named service, status, and next action.
Forwarding and spoof alert quality
SimpleDMARC showed the forwarded SPF failure, but the explanation needed manual write-up. Suped separates forwarding noise from spoofing and authentication drift so alerts are easier to route.
Hosted authentication records
Both products left gaps around hosted DMARC, hosted SPF, or hosted MTA-STS in the tested workflows. Suped brings those record-management tasks into the same workflow as DMARC reporting and policy movement.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from MXtoolbox or SimpleDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.

Frequently asked questions

Here's why customers love Suped for DMARC monitoring

MONEYME cover

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped

See how MONEYME uses Suped
Jam Cyber cover

How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped

See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
DigiBean cover

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients

See how DigiBean uses Suped
Alliance Group cover

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped

See how Alliance Group uses Suped
Maaser cover

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement

See how Maaser uses Suped
G2 LeaderG2 Users Most Likely To RecommendG2 Easiest To Do Business WithG2 High PerformerG2 Best Estimated ROI
DMARC monitoring

Start monitoring your DMARC reports today

Suped DMARC platform dashboard
What you'll get with Suped
Real-time DMARC report monitoring and analysis
Automated alerts for authentication failures
Clear recommendations to improve email deliverability
Protection against phishing and domain spoofing