What is the primary difference in approach between MailHardener and Sendmarc?

MailHardener provides a broad set of email security features, appealing to users who want extensive control and a more self-managed experience. Sendmarc, on the other hand, excels in offering a highly guided, often managed, DMARC implementation journey, making it ideal for those who prefer expert assistance.

Which product offers a free tier or trial?

MailHardener provides a free tier that allows users to monitor DMARC for a limited number of domains. Sendmarc offers a free trial that includes basic reporting for one domain and up to 5,000 emails per month, ideal for initial DMARC exploration.

Is either product suitable for Managed Service Providers (MSPs)?

Yes, both MailHardener and Sendmarc offer plans tailored for MSPs. MailHardener has a specialized MSP plan, and Sendmarc provides a multi-tenant, co-branded platform designed to help MSPs centrally manage DMARC for a large number of clients.

How do these tools help with email deliverability?

Both products improve email deliverability by ensuring that your emails are properly authenticated (via DMARC, SPF, DKIM). This helps email providers trust your sending domain, reducing the likelihood of your emails landing in spam folders or being rejected. Tools like Suped also offer comprehensive DMARC monitoring to prevent deliverability issues.

Can these products help with advanced email authentication standards like BIMI or MTA-STS?

Yes, both MailHardener and Sendmarc support these advanced standards. MailHardener offers tools for BIMI and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT, while Sendmarc's advanced plans specifically include BIMI configuration and MTA-STS & TLS reporting, assisting with their implementation and monitoring.

MailHardener vs Sendmarc

Choose MailHardener for comprehensive security features, or Sendmarc for a highly guided DMARC implementation journey.

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

4.9 / 5(39)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

MailHardener offers a robust suite of tools extending beyond basic DMARC reporting to encompass SPF, DKIM, BIMI, MTA-STS, and DNS monitoring. We found its dashboard provides granular control and detailed insights into email authentication, making it a strong choice for those who appreciate comprehensive oversight.

Its strength lies in providing a broad security umbrella, allowing users to manage various aspects of their email ecosystem from a single platform. We've seen it perform admirably in detecting potential misconfigurations and identifying unauthorized senders, offering a holistic approach to email security posture management.

Sendmarc focuses heavily on guiding users to DMARC compliance, with features like detailed DMARC, SPF, and DKIM configuration assistance. We noted its emphasis on compliance for major providers such as Google and Microsoft, making it particularly appealing for organizations with high-volume sending to these platforms.

Beyond core DMARC, Sendmarc provides blacklist (and blocklist) reporting, MTA-STS and TLS reporting, and user access logs. Its managed service offerings, especially in higher tiers, demonstrate a commitment to ensuring full DMARC implementation, taking much of the heavy lifting off the user's plate.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

From our hands-on experience, MailHardener presents a clean and intuitive interface. We found it relatively straightforward to navigate, with essential DMARC reports and configuration options clearly laid out. The learning curve for new users is manageable, especially for those with some technical background in email infrastructure.

Its dashboards are designed to give actionable insights, allowing for quick identification of issues and sources. While it offers advanced features, the core reporting functions are accessible without needing extensive training, which we appreciate for daily monitoring tasks.

Sendmarc prioritizes a user-friendly and guided experience, which is evident from its onboarding process. We observed that the platform is designed to simplify complex DMARC concepts, making it accessible even for those less familiar with email authentication protocols. This can be a huge advantage for organizations just starting their DMARC journey.

However, some users might encounter a slight learning curve, especially if they are diving into the more advanced features without the full managed service. We noted that while the interface is generally intuitive, leveraging all its capabilities might require familiarization with its specific workflows.

Which product has the best support

Support

MailHardener provides reliable support, typically through email and a comprehensive knowledge base. We found their documentation to be quite thorough, enabling us to resolve many queries independently. For technical questions, their support team is generally responsive and provides detailed explanations.

Their support model seems to be effective for users who prefer to troubleshoot independently first, then escalate if necessary. We've had positive experiences with their team when dealing with specific DMARC implementation challenges or platform questions.

Sendmarc consistently receives high praise for its exceptional customer support. We've seen reviews highlighting their proactive approach, with dedicated teams offering weekly check-ins, engineer training, and comprehensive guidance through the DMARC implementation process. This hands-on assistance can be invaluable.

Their commitment to ensuring clients reach DMARC compliance is evident in their support offerings, which extend to managed services and expert consultation. For organizations seeking a partner rather than just a tool, Sendmarc's support model is a significant differentiator, as they essentially become an extension of your IT team.

Who should use each product

Suitability

MailHardener is an excellent fit for organizations, from SMBs to enterprise, that appreciate a comprehensive suite of security features and prefer a more self-directed approach to DMARC management. Its detailed reporting and policy management tools empower technical users to maintain tight control over their email security posture.

For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), MailHardener offers a dedicated plan, allowing them to efficiently manage DMARC for multiple clients. Its flexibility also makes it suitable for businesses looking to mature their email security beyond basic DMARC, embracing a broader range of authentication and monitoring protocols.

Sendmarc is particularly well-suited for organizations, including SMBs and large enterprises, that require significant guidance and a managed service approach to DMARC implementation. If you're new to DMARC or have limited internal resources, Sendmarc's hands-on support and compliance focus can be a game-changer.

It's highly suitable for government entities and large corporations that need stringent security and regulatory compliance, especially with major email providers. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) will also find value in Sendmarc's multi-tenant platform, designed for centrally managing thousands of customers and domains with co-branding options.

How does MailHardener compare with Sendmarc?

DMARC report analysis

Provides detailed insights into DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.

Source detection

Identifies legitimate and unauthorized email sending sources.

Forward detection

Helps distinguish legitimate forwards from spoofing attempts.

Spoof detection

Detects and helps prevent email impersonation and spoofing attacks.

Notifications and alerts

Provides real-time or periodic alerts on DMARC events.

Reporting

Offers various reports for email authentication and security.

API

Offers an API for integration with other systems.

API-first approach

Multi-tenancy

Ability to manage multiple clients or domains from a single account.

MSP plans available

Multi-tenant platform for MSPs

SPF flattening

Helps overcome the 10-DNS-lookup limit for SPF records.

Hosted DMARC

Provides hosted DMARC record management.

BIMI

Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).

BIMI configuration

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Supports MTA-STS and TLS reporting for secure email transport.

MTA-STS & TLS reporting

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors sender reputation and blocklist (blacklist) status.

Blacklist & threat reporting

AI copilot

Utilizes AI for guided DMARC implementation and insights.

DNS monitoring

Monitors DNS records for potential issues.

DNS analysis tools

Self hostable

Option to self-host the DMARC reporting solution.

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free plan or a trial period.

Free tier available

Free trial available

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, MailHardener currently lacks public reviews, which might be a consideration for those who rely on social proof for vendor selection. Sendmarc, while highly praised, has some feedback indicating a learning curve for new users navigating its comprehensive platform and occasional desires for enhanced automated reporting features.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

4.9 / 5(39)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Agile, dynamic and great feature set from Sendmarc

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Sendmarc? Cost effective tooling to provide the basic security neccessities for organizations. Easy and quick implementation with intuitive reporting. Extremely easy to implement. What do you dislike about Sendmarc? Better communucation as a partner for effective implementation with customers. What problems is Sendmarc solving and how is that benefiting you? Primarily email impersanation.

Mohamed O.

Head of Managed Services (MSP) Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

rebyC spreading the love about Sendmarc

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Sendmarc? Sendmarc helps organizations protect their email domains from phishing and spoofing attacks. What do you dislike about Sendmarc? If your company are considering using Sendmarc or are experiencing challenges with the platform, it's advisable to check the latest reviews, forums, or customer feedback for up-to-date information on potential dislikes or issues. What problems is Sendmarc solving and how is that benefiting you? The benefits of using Sendmarc include a reduction in successful phishing attacks, enhanced brand trust, improved email deliverability, and better overall email security. By preventing unauthorized use of domains and increasing the visibility into email authentication, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with email-based threats.

Verified User in Computer & Network Security

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Enhanced Email Security with Sendmarc: Protecting Your Communications

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about Sendmarc? Sendmarc simplifies email authentication, making it easy for users to implement and manage. It has a User-Friendly Interface. Offers valuable insights into email delivery with Actionable Insights. What do you dislike about Sendmarc? There's a learning curve for new users. They could enhance onboarding or provide additional resources. What problems is Sendmarc solving and how is that benefiting you? 1. Combats Email Spoofing and Phishing 2. Ensures Email Authenticity 3. Improved Email Deliverability and Reputation Management

Verified User in Events Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

MailHardener offers clearly stated pricing in Euros for its core plans, while Sendmarc details features per tier but requires direct contact for monetary pricing.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Free tier available

Free Trial (up to 5k emails)

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Standard Plan (EUR)

Advanced Plan (starts at 100k emails, contact for pricing)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Large Plan (EUR)

Premium Plan (unlimited emails, contact for pricing)