Mail Tower vs.
MyDMARC in 2026

Mail Tower

MyDMARC
vs.
We tested Mail Tower and MyDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. Mail Tower felt steadier for controlled DMARC reporting and published business tiers, while MyDMARC was quicker for small teams that need sender classification without a heavy setup.
Mail Tower
DMARC reporting for business domains
Starts at
From 10€ / month
Best fit
Teams that want published domain allowances and controlled policy review
In one line
Mail Tower gave us reliable aggregate-report review, but buyers should compare how much guided source identification and published starter pricing in Suped's product matter before choosing.
MyDMARC
DMARC reporting for SMBs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams that want quick setup and simple sender review
In one line
MyDMARC got the parked domain and unknown sender visible faster, but its public plan detail stops before enterprise or MSP workflows.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
TLDR: choose by ownership model, not dashboard preference
Pick Mail Tower if
Choose Mail Tower when we have a DNS owner and need controlled business-domain reporting
Its published tiers covered our three test domains without email-volume caps.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace stayed separated cleanly across corporate and marketing traffic.
The parked domain stayed visible during quarantine planning, but policy movement still needed our checklist.
From 10€ / month
Pick MyDMARC if
Choose MyDMARC when we need a fast start for one to 20 domains
The Free tier was enough to watch the parked domain during early setup.
SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to name during the first sender review.
The forwarded SPF failure was easier to explain because DKIM context stayed nearby.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Choose Suped's product when we want guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Automated issue detection turns spoofing, forwarding, and unknown senders into owner-ready tasks.
Hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS reduce DNS handoff gaps.
Published starter pricing and MSP billing make early scoping easier.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
Mail Tower
MyDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Parsing and organizing aggregate DMARC XML reports.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Turning report traffic into recognizable sending services and owners.
Supported, more manual
Supported
Supported
Forward detection
Explaining SPF failures caused by forwarding.
Partial
Supported
Supported
Spoof detection
Flagging unauthorized mail using the domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for authentication changes and risky sources.
Email alerts
Basic alerts
Supported
Reporting
Exports, summaries, and recurring report workflow.
Supported
Supported
Supported
API
Programmatic access for report and account data.
Large tier only
Not publicly listed
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client or business-unit separation with delegated work.
MSP/custom plan
Manual workflow
Supported
SPF flattening
Flattened SPF include management to stay under DNS lookup limits.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting and policy changes.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS and TLS reporting setup.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation checks tied to email operations.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatic detection of DNS, source, and authentication problems.
Manual workflow
Partial issue labels
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation and remediation guidance.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and related DNS changes.
DMARC DNS checks
Record checks
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Not supported
Free trial/free tier
Public free tier or trial entry point.
No public free tier
Free tier
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
Each score uses the same editorial rubric we applied after the 90-day test. Higher is better in every row, and unsupported categories receive 0.0 instead of partial credit.
Mail Tower scored higher on pricing clarity and controlled reporting; MyDMARC scored higher on quick source resolution.
Mail Tower's published euro tiers, larger domain allowances, and Large-tier API made its commercial path easier to read, but source ownership and forwarding explanations still needed our notes. MyDMARC got the unknown sender, Mailchimp, and SendGrid classification in front of us faster, but account separation, API detail, and enterprise pricing were thinner. Neither product gave us hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, or blocklist (blacklist) monitoring in the public workflow we tested.
Mail Tower score
52/100
MyDMARC score
51.5/100
Mail Tower
52/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
6.0
Alerting and integrations
5.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
6.5
MyDMARC
51.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
4.5
Alerting and integrations
6.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
7.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
Feature set
Coverage vs action
MyDMARC wins on quick source clarity. Mail Tower wins on controlled reporting depth.
MyDMARC made day-to-day source review faster, especially around the unknown sender and forwarding case. Mail Tower gave us more structured report review and clearer domain allowances, but fixes still depended on our notes. Use Suped's product as a reference point when guided fixes and automated issue detection are core buying criteria, not optional extras.
Mail Tower

Microsoft 365 and Google grouped
SendGrid labeling stayed manual
DKIM subdomain detail visible
MyDMARC

Mailchimp source grouped cleanly
Unknown sender surfaced faster
Forwarded SPF explained clearly
Mail Tower parsed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly after the first DNS check and kept the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain separated. SendGrid and Mailchimp became readable once we labeled them, but the unknown sender stayed in a generic bucket until we matched IP, DKIM domain, and owner notes ourselves. The DKIM pass on a subdomain was visible in drilldown, while the SPF pass with visible From mismatch needed manual explanation before we were comfortable moving policy.
MyDMARC felt more direct for source classification. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as expected senders quickly, SendGrid and Mailchimp were easier to name during the first review, and the unknown sender was called out as unclassified before it blended into normal traffic. The forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because the UI kept the SPF failure near the DKIM pass, though the final owner and remediation notes still had to be written outside the tool.
User experience
Control vs speed
MyDMARC was faster to operate. Mail Tower gave us steadier control.
Mail Tower worked best when we had time to review each source and document owner decisions. MyDMARC reduced the number of clicks needed to understand the unknown sender and the forwarded SPF failure. The tradeoff was control: Mail Tower exposed more raw detail, while MyDMARC favored faster interpretation.
Mail Tower

Three domains added methodically
Unknown sender required filtering
Forwarded SPF buried in detail
MyDMARC

Parked domain prompts were clear
Unknown sender surfaced early
Forwarded SPF explained faster
Mail Tower onboarding took one afternoon for the three test domains. The corporate and marketing DNS records were clear, but the parked domain needed a second check before reporting started cleanly. Finding the unknown sender required filtering by IP and DKIM domain, and the forwarded SPF failure was visible only after opening the row detail.
MyDMARC got the corporate and marketing domains into a working state in under an hour, and the parked-domain prompts were clearer. The unknown sender surfaced as unclassified early in the review, which made assignment faster. The forwarded mail case was easier to explain because SPF failure and DKIM pass context stayed together, although the final policy note still had to be written by us.
Support
Setup help vs self serve
Mail Tower gave clearer DNS handoff. MyDMARC leaned more self-serve.
Mail Tower's setup flow gave us enough DNS detail to hand records to an infrastructure owner without much rewriting. MyDMARC was easier for a small team to start without help, but its public support promise became stronger only on the Pro tier. For escalation and enterprise onboarding, Mail Tower had the clearer path, while MyDMARC had fewer steps at the start.
Mail Tower

DNS handoff was usable
Escalation path felt sales led
Enterprise steps needed confirmation
MyDMARC

Self-serve answers were quick
Priority support starts on Pro
Enterprise handoff was thin
With Mail Tower, the DNS handoff was practical: we could copy the DMARC record values for the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain into a ticket with little cleanup. The support expectation felt more business-oriented, especially where API access and MSP/custom needs entered the discussion. The unresolved part was escalation detail, because enterprise onboarding still needed confirmation outside the product.
With MyDMARC, the self-serve path was simpler. We could onboard the three domains and review Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the support desk sender without needing a formal onboarding call. The support tradeoff was plan-based: priority email support was tied to Pro, and we did not see public enterprise onboarding detail for teams that need escalation, SSO, or a dedicated rollout.
Suitability
Enterprise fit vs operator fit
Mail Tower fits controlled business reporting. MyDMARC fits smaller operator-led teams.
Mail Tower fit the team that has a DNS owner, a security reviewer, and a predictable domain list. MyDMARC fit the team that wants to start quickly and handle a handful of domains without a procurement loop. If MSP workflows and alert quality drive the decision, compare client separation, routing, and handoff notes directly against Suped's product before committing.
Mail Tower

Enterprise domains grouped cleanly
MSP route needs sales
Handoff notes stayed manual
MyDMARC

SMB domain bands are clear
Client separation felt limited
Recurring reports need work
Mail Tower made more sense for enterprise and MSP-adjacent work than for a solo mailbox owner. Account separation looked workable through its MSP/custom route, domain grouping matched our corporate, marketing, and parked-domain split, and recurring exports could support monthly reporting. The gap was client handoff: we still had to turn spoofing, unknown sender, and forwarded SPF findings into separate notes for each owner.
MyDMARC suited SMB use best in our test. The Free, Basic, and Pro domain bands map cleanly to one domain, the three-domain setup, and a broader small-business estate, and sender review was fast enough for a lean operator. For MSP use, account separation, recurring client reports, and handoff notes stayed too manual for a portfolio with repeated customer reviews.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
Mail Tower
Best for teams that want controlled DMARC reporting with published business tiers
After 90 days, Mail Tower felt like controlled DMARC reporting for teams that can own DNS and policy decisions. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace rolled up predictably, SendGrid and Mailchimp were visible once we named them, and the support desk sender stayed easy to track after the first week.
The harder part was actioning edge cases. The unknown sender required manual classification, the forwarded SPF failure needed explanation for stakeholders, and parked-domain policy movement needed our own checklist. It suited a team that can make decisions from evidence and does not need hosted records inside the same workflow.
Where it wins
Stable three-domain reporting
Clear paid domain allowances
API on large tier
Parked domain stayed visible
Where it lags
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Unknown sender workflow stayed manual
Alerts needed more routing context
No blocklist (blacklist) monitoring
Pricing
From 10€ / month
Free tier
No public free tier
Onboarding
Same day with DNS checks
G2 rating
0.0 / 5
MyDMARC
Best for small teams that want fast setup and quick sender review
MyDMARC felt lighter and quicker for a small team. The Free tier got the parked domain running, Basic and Pro covered the three-domain test cleanly, the unknown sender surfaced faster, and SendGrid plus Mailchimp naming required less detective work during the first review.
The tradeoff was enterprise readiness. Recurring reports and client handoff were thinner, support priority depended on Pro, and no API or hosted-record workflow was public in the plan detail we reviewed. Forwarding explanations were good, but enforcement planning still needed owner notes outside the product.
Where it wins
Free entry for one domain
Fast sender classification
Clear retention steps
Forwarding case easier to explain
Where it lags
No public enterprise tier
Limited account separation
No hosted SPF or MTA-STS
Blocklist monitoring not found
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
$0 for 1 domain
Onboarding
Under one hour for basics
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
Mail Tower
MyDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
10€ / month
Small Enterprises covers up to 5 active domains and unlimited aggregate reports.
$0
Free covers 1 monitored domain, 7 days retention, and daily parsing.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
10€ / month
Small Enterprises still covers this domain count when the employee band fits.
$19 / month
Basic covers 5 monitored domains, 30 days retention, and hourly parsing.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From 20€ / month
Medium covers 10 active domains for smaller organizations; 250+ employee organizations move to 50€ / month.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 monitored domains, 90 days retention, and near real-time parsing.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From 50€ / month
Large covers 25 active domains; custom MSP pricing is not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public tiers stop at 20 monitored domains and do not publish a higher plan price.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
Mail Tower and MyDMARC small, medium, and large numbers use public monthly list prices where the listed tier covers the segment. Mail Tower enterprise pricing uses its public Large tier starting point, with custom MSP pricing not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. MyDMARC enterprise is not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026 because public tiers stop at 20 domains. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started

Guided fixes, not manual notes
Mail Tower made the unknown sender and forwarded SPF case readable, but the fix path still lived in our notes. Suped turns sender findings into owner tasks and next DNS steps.
Hosted records in one workflow
Both reviewed products lacked hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and hosted MTA-STS in the public workflow we tested. Suped keeps reporting and managed records together for teams that want one operational path.
MSP handoff without rework
MyDMARC worked well for a small domain set, but client grouping and recurring handoff stayed manual. Suped's MSP workflow keeps client separation, recurring reports, and issue notes in the same place.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from Mail Tower or MyDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions

How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped

How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped

How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped

How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped

