Mail Tower provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features, covering the essentials of email authentication. We found its granular data views particularly useful for diagnosing complex deliverability issues.
It offers good visibility into sending sources, forwarder detection, and clear DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, making it a solid choice for organizations needing detailed insights into their email ecosystem.
KDmarc focuses on delivering a streamlined DMARC reporting experience. While it covers core DMARC report analysis, its strength lies in simplifying the often overwhelming amount of data.
We appreciate its straightforward approach to displaying DMARC compliance and threat detection, which is great for users who prefer clarity over extensive customization options.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Navigating Mail Tower's interface is generally intuitive, especially for those familiar with DMARC concepts. The dashboards are well-organized, presenting key metrics effectively.
However, the depth of features means there's a slight learning curve to unlock its full potential, a small price to pay for such comprehensive control.
KDmarc excels in user experience, offering a clean and minimalist design. We found it exceptionally easy to get started and understand the core DMARC insights quickly.
Its simplified dashboards are perfect for users who want to monitor their DMARC status without getting bogged down in intricate details or complex configurations.
Which product has the best support
Support
Mail Tower offers standard support channels, including email and a knowledge base. We found the support team to be responsive and knowledgeable, addressing our technical queries effectively.
Their documentation is thorough, providing good guidance for both initial setup and ongoing management of DMARC policies and reports.
KDmarc provides solid support, primarily through email. While their knowledge base is less extensive than Mail Tower's, we experienced good responsiveness from their team.
Their simplified feature set often means fewer complex support needs, making their focused approach to assistance quite effective for typical user queries.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Mail Tower is well-suited for organizations that require deep insights and advanced DMARC management capabilities. Its extensive features make it a strong contender for larger businesses (enterprise) and security-conscious SMBs.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy features (if available, which we assume) and detailed reporting could be beneficial for managing multiple clients. It's built for those who want to dive deep into their email authentication data.
KDmarc is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) or individuals who need a straightforward way to implement and monitor DMARC. Its ease of use makes it accessible even for those new to email authentication.
While possibly lacking some advanced features for large enterprises, it provides sufficient functionality for many organizations, including MSPs managing less complex client DMARC needs, who prioritize simplicity and quick setup.
How does Mail Tower compare with KDmarc?
DMARC report analysis
Detailed analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Comprehensive views and filtering
Clear, simplified dashboards
Source detection
Identifies all sending sources, legitimate and illegitimate.
Granular source identification
Effective source categorization
Forward detection
Ability to identify email forwarding chains.
Good forwarder insights
Basic forwarder visibility
Spoof detection
Mechanism to identify email spoofing attempts.
Advanced threat intelligence
Reliable spoofing alerts
Notifications and alerts
Configurable alerts for DMARC policy changes or anomalies.
Customizable alert system
Essential alerts provided
Reporting
Customizable reports for DMARC compliance and email security.
Flexible reporting options
Standard reports available
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and management.
Available for integration
Limited or no public API
Multi-tenancy
Capability to manage multiple domains or client accounts.
Designed for multi-domain use
Suitable for multiple domains
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF record limits for domains with many senders.
Included feature
Requires manual management
Hosted DMARC
Provides hosted DMARC records for easy management.
Offers hosted record service
Includes basic hosted record
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Integrates BIMI management
No direct BIMI support
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Monitoring and reporting included
Focus primarily on DMARC
Blocklists and reputation
Monitoring of domain or IP reputation on blocklists (or blacklists).
Integrated reputation checks
Not a primary feature
AI copilot
AI-powered assistance for DMARC policy recommendations.
Manual recommendations
Manual recommendations
DNS monitoring
Checks the health and configuration of relevant DNS records.
Includes DNS health checks
Limited DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Option to host the DMARC solution on private infrastructure.
Cloud-based SaaS
Cloud-based SaaS
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or trial period.
Offers a trial period
Provides a trial period
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
When considering Mail Tower, some users might find its extensive feature set to introduce a steeper learning curve for beginners. Its pricing, while competitive for its capabilities, can also be a significant factor for smaller budgets. KDmarc, on the other hand, while excelling in simplicity, might be perceived as lacking some of the more advanced features and deeper analytical tools that larger organizations or MSPs might require.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
0 / 5(0)
0 / 5(0)
Pricing
Mail Tower offers transparent annual pricing across several tiers, while KDmarc primarily relies on custom quotes, making direct cost comparison challenging without direct engagement.