Suped

Mail Tower vs ELK DMARC

Choose Mail Tower for a managed DMARC solution or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source approach.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower provides a comprehensive suite for DMARC, SPF, and DKIM management. Its strength lies in visualizing complex email authentication data, offering actionable insights for policy enforcement. We have found its domain overview and detailed report analysis to be particularly useful for identifying legitimate sending sources and misconfigurations.
It offers a managed solution, meaning we interact with a web interface and rely on their infrastructure for data processing and storage. This simplifies setup and maintenance, allowing us to focus on policy adjustments rather than infrastructure management. The platform aims to demystify DMARC, presenting data in an accessible format.
ELK DMARC is an open-source tool built on the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) for self-hosting DMARC reports. Its core appeal is the granular control and customization it offers, allowing us to tailor data storage, processing, and visualization to our exact needs. This setup is ideal for those with specific data retention policies or a preference for keeping all data within their own network.
While powerful, its feature set is not as 'out-of-the-box' as a commercial solution. We found that much of the analytical depth depends on our ability to configure Kibana dashboards and interpret raw logs. It is more of a framework that, once expertly configured, can provide immense insights, but requires significant initial investment in setup and ongoing management.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Mail Tower is straightforward, even for those new to DMARC. The dashboard presents a clear overview of DMARC compliance, authentication failures, and sending sources. We appreciate the intuitive filters and drill-down capabilities, making it easy to pinpoint specific issues or analyze trends. The interface is clean and modern, reducing the cognitive load often associated with email security data.
While generally user-friendly, some advanced configurations or specific data queries might require a bit of exploration within the interface. However, the learning curve is gentle, and most essential tasks are accessible within a few clicks. It is designed for efficiency, letting us quickly move from data observation to policy adjustment.
The user experience with ELK DMARC is inherently tied to your familiarity with the ELK stack. It is not a plug-and-play solution, you are essentially building your own DMARC reporting interface on top of powerful, general-purpose data tools. This means the 'UX' is largely what you make of it in Kibana, from creating custom dashboards to setting up visualizations.
For those well-versed in Elasticsearch and Kibana, ELK DMARC offers unparalleled flexibility to visualize data precisely how we want it. However, for newcomers, it can be daunting. We spent considerable time configuring dashboards and understanding the data structure before we could effectively monitor our DMARC compliance. It is a tool for the technically proficient, offering a steep but rewarding learning curve.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower provides dedicated customer support, often through email or an in-platform ticketing system. Our experience indicates that responses are timely and helpful, guiding us through platform features or troubleshooting DMARC configuration issues. They offer a more hands-on support experience, which is valuable when dealing with the intricacies of email authentication.
The level of support typically scales with your subscription plan, with higher tiers potentially offering more personalized assistance. For organizations that prefer a safety net and expert guidance, Mail Tower's support structure is a significant advantage, ensuring we are never left to decipher complex DMARC reports alone.
As an open-source project, ELK DMARC's 'support' primarily comes from the community and the documentation provided by its developers. Issues or questions are typically addressed through GitHub issues or community forums, relying on peer assistance rather than dedicated customer service. We found this requires a proactive approach, searching through existing discussions or contributing our own questions.
While the community can be incredibly helpful for common problems, unique or complex issues might take longer to resolve, depending on community engagement. There is no direct support line or SLA, which means organizations adopting ELK DMARC must be comfortable with a do-it-yourself troubleshooting mindset or have internal expertise to handle potential challenges.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower is well-suited for a broad range of users seeking a managed DMARC reporting solution. For SMBs, it offers an accessible entry point into DMARC enforcement without needing specialized technical staff. Enterprise clients will appreciate its scalability and robust reporting features, ensuring comprehensive visibility across large email infrastructures.
For MSPs (managed service providers), Mail Tower provides an efficient way to manage DMARC for multiple clients through a single interface, offering aggregated views and streamlined reporting. Its user-friendly design and dedicated support make it an ideal choice for organizations that prioritize ease of use, comprehensive features, and reliable vendor support over self-hosting.
ELK DMARC shines for organizations with strong technical capabilities and a preference for open-source, self-hosted solutions. It is particularly appealing to enterprises that need absolute control over their data, have existing ELK stack infrastructure, or require highly customized reporting. Its self-hostable nature means data never leaves your network, which is a critical factor for some.
While not explicitly designed for MSPs, an MSP with strong DevOps and ELK stack expertise could potentially adapt it for multi-tenancy. However, this would require significant custom development and management overhead. For SMBs, the barrier to entry due to technical requirements is generally too high, making it less suitable unless they have dedicated IT resources with ELK stack proficiency.

How does Mail Tower compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both Mail Tower and ELK DMARC offer distinct advantages, but they also come with their own set of considerations. Mail Tower, while user-friendly and feature-rich, operates as a managed service, meaning less direct control over the underlying data infrastructure for some users. ELK DMARC, on the other hand, provides immense flexibility through self-hosting, but this comes at the cost of significant technical expertise required for deployment, configuration, and ongoing maintenance. Its reliance on the ELK stack means a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with these technologies.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

The pricing models for Mail Tower and ELK DMARC are fundamentally different, reflecting their distinct approaches to DMARC reporting.Mail Toweroffers tiered subscription plans based on email volume, providing a clear cost structure for a managed service. ELK DMARC, being open-source and self-hosted, has no direct software cost, but requires investment in infrastructure and technical resources.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Tiered annual cost
Self-host, infrastructure cost
Medium
Tiered annual cost
Self-host, infrastructure cost
Large
Tiered annual cost
Self-host, infrastructure cost
Enterprise
Custom pricing
Self-host, scalable infrastructure

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Mail Tower or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Mail Tower vs ELK DMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped