Suped

Mail Tower vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Choose Mail Tower for robust DMARC enforcement, choose Centera DMARC Compliance for simplified setup.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features. We found its dashboard offers detailed insights into email authentication, showing DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment for all incoming email sources. It breaks down reports to help pinpoint authentication failures, offering granular data that is crucial for understanding email flow.
The platform excels at identifying legitimate email senders versus fraudulent attempts. Its capabilities extend to identifying forwarding chains and distinguishing between direct mail and third-party senders, which helps in making informed decisions about DMARC policy enforcement. We particularly appreciate its extensive filtering options for deeper analysis.
Centera DMARC Compliance focuses on simplifying the path to DMARC enforcement. Its core strength lies in presenting DMARC reports in an accessible format, making it easier for users to grasp their email security posture without getting bogged down in excessive technical jargon. We noted its clear display of DMARC compliance rates and identified threats.
While it covers the essential DMARC reporting features, like SPF and DKIM authentication results, its depth of analysis is somewhat less extensive compared to Mail Tower. It provides a solid foundation for DMARC implementation and monitoring, but more advanced users might find themselves wanting additional customization and diagnostic tools beyond the basics.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Mail Tower requires a bit of a learning curve, especially for those new to DMARC. The dashboard, while rich in data, can initially feel overwhelming due to the sheer volume of information presented. We found that once you understand its structure, the power of its analytics becomes evident, but it is not an immediate "plug-and-play" experience.
The setup process involves configuring DNS records, which is standard, but the platform's advanced features mean there are more settings to fine-tune. Its interface is functional and provides comprehensive details, but it prioritizes data density over simplistic design, making it more suited for users who are comfortable with in-depth technical analysis.
Centera DMARC Compliance shines in its user-friendly interface. We experienced a streamlined onboarding process, and the dashboard is designed with clarity in mind, presenting critical information without unnecessary clutter. It is quite intuitive, allowing users to quickly see their DMARC status and any immediate issues requiring attention.
The guided setup and straightforward presentation of data make it an excellent choice for individuals or teams who need to implement DMARC without extensive prior knowledge. While it may lack some of the deeper diagnostic tools, its ease of use means faster adoption and less time spent deciphering complex reports, which we certainly appreciate.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower offers standard support channels, including email assistance and a knowledge base. We found the documentation to be thorough, providing detailed articles on various DMARC concepts and platform functionalities. Response times for email queries are generally within business hours, and the support team is knowledgeable, albeit sometimes taking a little while to respond during peak periods.
For users delving into more complex DMARC configurations or troubleshooting intricate issues, the available resources are helpful. However, for immediate assistance, such as live chat, options might be limited, requiring users to rely more on their self-service documentation or email for resolution.
Centera DMARC Compliance emphasizes a more guided approach to support. Their help resources are integrated well into the user interface, often providing contextual tips and explanations. We observed that their support team is generally responsive, aiming to simplify complex DMARC issues for users who might not be technical experts.
They often provide personalized assistance for initial setup and ongoing compliance, which is a significant advantage for those seeking a hands-on approach from their provider. While their self-service knowledge base might be less extensive than Mail Tower's, their direct support tends to be more accessible for general inquiries and setup assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Mail Tower is best suited for organizations that require deep DMARC analytics and robust enforcement capabilities. This includes larger enterprises, security-focused teams, and email administrators who need precise control over their email authentication policies. Its advanced features cater to complex email infrastructures and high-volume senders.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Mail Tower offers the tools necessary to manage DMARC for multiple clients with varying needs, although multi-tenancy features might require careful consideration. Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) might find it to be overkill, unless they have a dedicated IT security professional to manage it.
Centera DMARC Compliance is an excellent fit for Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) and organizations prioritizing ease of use and a straightforward path to DMARC compliance. It simplifies the often-complex world of email security, making it accessible even for those without extensive technical expertise. Its focus is on getting to enforcement quickly and efficiently.
MSPs could use Centera DMARC Compliance for clients with less complex email environments who need a reliable, easy-to-manage DMARC solution, but it might lack the granular controls for their more demanding enterprise clients. Large enterprises might find its feature set a bit limited for their intricate security requirements.

How does Mail Tower compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Mail Tower, while powerful, can present a steeper learning curve for new users, potentially leading to slower adoption without dedicated technical oversight. Centera DMARC Compliance, conversely, prioritizes simplicity but may fall short for organizations needing advanced features or deep integration capabilities.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Mail Tower provides a clear, tiered pricing model listed annually in Euros, while Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for any pricing information.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Mail Tower or Centera DMARC Compliance?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions