LetsDMARC, as part of the broader Libraesva email security suite, offers a robust set of features that extend beyond basic DMARC reporting. We found its capabilities to include detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic report analysis, helping to visualize email traffic and identify unauthorized senders with clarity. It integrates well into a larger security ecosystem.
Beyond core DMARC, LetsDMARC also provides tools for SPF and DKIM management, DNS monitoring, and often includes features related to broader email security, such as anti-phishing and spam filtering. This makes it a more encompassing solution for organizations looking to fortify their entire email infrastructure.
Centera DMARC Compliance is designed with a singular focus on DMARC implementation and enforcement. Our experience shows it provides clear, actionable insights into DMARC reports, allowing users to move from a monitoring policy (p=none) to an enforcement policy (p=quarantine or p=reject) with confidence. Its primary strength lies in its dedicated DMARC capabilities.
While its feature set is more niche, Centera DMARC Compliance excels in the areas it focuses on. It offers good source identification, detection of forwarding issues, and robust spoof detection. It provides the necessary data to understand email authentication status and make informed decisions about policy changes, without the added complexity of a full security suite.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
LetsDMARC presents a professional and functional interface, typical of enterprise-grade security products. While comprehensive, the dashboard can initially feel a bit dense due to the sheer volume of information and options available. Users familiar with broader security platforms will likely find its navigation intuitive after a short learning curve.
Setting up DMARC records and configuring policies within LetsDMARC is straightforward, guided by clear instructions. The reporting visualizations are detailed, offering various filters and drill-down options for deep analysis. However, some minor graphic settings did not persist when navigating between pages, a small quirk we observed.
Centera DMARC Compliance boasts a clean and focused user interface, prioritizing ease of use for DMARC management. Its dashboard is less cluttered, making it easier for users to quickly grasp their DMARC compliance status and identify key areas needing attention. This streamlined approach is particularly appealing to those new to DMARC.
The setup process is relatively simple, focusing on the essential steps for DMARC record implementation and data collection. The reporting is concise and to the point, providing the necessary metrics without overwhelming the user with extraneous details. We found its simplicity to be a significant advantage for rapid deployment and ongoing monitoring.
Which product has the best support
Support
LetsDMARC, being part of Libraesva, benefits from a well-established support infrastructure. We found their customer support to be responsive and knowledgeable, particularly helpful when navigating the more advanced features of the platform or integrating it with existing security systems. They offer professional assistance for complex DMARC scenarios.
Their support resources often include detailed documentation and guides, reflecting a comprehensive approach to user enablement. For organizations with intricate email architectures, having access to this level of expert support is a significant advantage, helping ensure smooth DMARC deployment and ongoing optimization.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers dedicated support for its DMARC-focused platform. While less is publicly known about the breadth of their support, our interactions suggest a competent team focused on DMARC-related queries. Their support is likely tailored to guide users through the specific challenges of DMARC implementation and policy adjustments.
Given its specialized nature, Centera's support is expected to be proficient in addressing common DMARC issues, from report interpretation to record configuration. For users primarily seeking DMARC expertise, their focused support model can be efficient in resolving specific authentication and deliverability concerns.
Who should use each product
Suitability
LetsDMARC is particularly well-suited for larger organizations (enterprise) and managed service providers (MSPs) who need an integrated approach to email security. Its comprehensive feature set, encompassing DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and broader email threat protection, makes it ideal for environments requiring a unified security posture. SMBs might find it more robust than strictly necessary, but still beneficial for future scaling.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities and extensive reporting are valuable for managing DMARC compliance across multiple client domains. Enterprises will appreciate its scalability, integration options, and the depth of its security features, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing a holistic email security solution.
Centera DMARC Compliance is an excellent choice for businesses of all sizes, from small to medium businesses (SMBs) to larger enterprises, that primarily need a dedicated and straightforward DMARC solution. Its focus on DMARC makes it less overwhelming for teams with limited resources or specific DMARC enforcement goals.
While it lacks the broader security suite of LetsDMARC, its simplicity and effectiveness in DMARC management can be a significant advantage for SMBs and organizations that already have other security solutions in place or prefer a modular approach. MSPs might find it useful for clients with less complex needs or as a specialized DMARC add-on.
How does LetsDMARC compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?
DMARC report analysis
Detailed analysis of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifies all sending sources, legitimate and illegitimate.
Forward detection
Helps in understanding email forwarding chains and their DMARC impact.
Spoof detection
Identifies and helps mitigate email impersonation (spoofing) attempts.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC compliance issues or policy changes.
Reporting
Customizable reports on DMARC performance and compliance.
API
Allows integration with other systems for data exchange and automation.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple client domains from a single interface.
SPF flattening
Helps manage SPF lookup limits by consolidating multiple SPF records.
Hosted DMARC
Provides hosted DMARC services to simplify management.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitors and reports on MTA-STS and TLS-RPT for secure email transport.
Blocklists and reputation
Integrates blocklist (or blacklist) checks and sender reputation monitoring.
Often part of Libraesva's broader security features.
Less focus on general blocklists, more on DMARC policy compliance.
AI copilot
Uses AI to assist with DMARC analysis and recommendations.
More likely to have advanced AI features as part of a comprehensive suite.
Focus is on core DMARC, less emphasis on AI-driven features.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records for changes affecting email authentication.
Part of its broader email security and management capabilities.
Self hostable
Ability to host the solution on-premises.
Primarily a cloud-based service for DMARC reporting.
Offered as a cloud-based DMARC compliance solution.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free version or a trial period.
Pricing is custom and requires a quote request.
No public information on free trial or tier available.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
When considering drawbacks, LetsDMARC's comprehensive nature means a potentially steeper learning curve for users new to email security platforms. Its pricing model also requires direct contact, which can be a hurdle for quick assessments. For Centera DMARC Compliance, the primary limitation is its specialized focus. While excellent for DMARC, it lacks the broader email security features that LetsDMARC offers, which might necessitate additional tools for a complete security strategy.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.5 / 5(2)
0 / 5(0)
Intuitive and easy-to-use software
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
The clarity of the instructions provided of the various steps
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
some graphic settings are not retained when changing pages
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Managing SPF, DMARK and DKIM of various sites in a single platform
Massimo G.
System Administrator Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great tool for SPF/DMARC integration
4.5 / 5
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
Ease of use, useful dashboard. Setup was simple and fast. Customer support is at the top.
What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC?
At the moment there is nothing to report about what dislike
What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
SPF lookup solved fat with LetsDMARC
Marco P.
System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Pricing
Both LetsDMARC and Centera DMARC Compliance opt for custom pricing models, requiring direct contact for quotes, which means no transparent, publicly available pricing tiers to compare directly.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with LetsDMARC or Centera DMARC Compliance?