Suped

LetsDMARC vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Choose LetsDMARC for comprehensive email security, opt for Centera DMARC Compliance for a streamlined DMARC focus.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
LetsDMARC, as part of the broader Libraesva email security suite, offers a robust set of features that extend beyond basic DMARC reporting. We found its capabilities to include detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic report analysis, helping to visualize email traffic and identify unauthorized senders with clarity. It integrates well into a larger security ecosystem.
Beyond core DMARC, LetsDMARC also provides tools for SPF and DKIM management, DNS monitoring, and often includes features related to broader email security, such as anti-phishing and spam filtering. This makes it a more encompassing solution for organizations looking to fortify their entire email infrastructure.
Centera DMARC Compliance is designed with a singular focus on DMARC implementation and enforcement. Our experience shows it provides clear, actionable insights into DMARC reports, allowing users to move from a monitoring policy (p=none) to an enforcement policy (p=quarantine or p=reject) with confidence. Its primary strength lies in its dedicated DMARC capabilities.
While its feature set is more niche, Centera DMARC Compliance excels in the areas it focuses on. It offers good source identification, detection of forwarding issues, and robust spoof detection. It provides the necessary data to understand email authentication status and make informed decisions about policy changes, without the added complexity of a full security suite.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
LetsDMARC presents a professional and functional interface, typical of enterprise-grade security products. While comprehensive, the dashboard can initially feel a bit dense due to the sheer volume of information and options available. Users familiar with broader security platforms will likely find its navigation intuitive after a short learning curve.
Setting up DMARC records and configuring policies within LetsDMARC is straightforward, guided by clear instructions. The reporting visualizations are detailed, offering various filters and drill-down options for deep analysis. However, some minor graphic settings did not persist when navigating between pages, a small quirk we observed.
Centera DMARC Compliance boasts a clean and focused user interface, prioritizing ease of use for DMARC management. Its dashboard is less cluttered, making it easier for users to quickly grasp their DMARC compliance status and identify key areas needing attention. This streamlined approach is particularly appealing to those new to DMARC.
The setup process is relatively simple, focusing on the essential steps for DMARC record implementation and data collection. The reporting is concise and to the point, providing the necessary metrics without overwhelming the user with extraneous details. We found its simplicity to be a significant advantage for rapid deployment and ongoing monitoring.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
LetsDMARC, being part of Libraesva, benefits from a well-established support infrastructure. We found their customer support to be responsive and knowledgeable, particularly helpful when navigating the more advanced features of the platform or integrating it with existing security systems. They offer professional assistance for complex DMARC scenarios.
Their support resources often include detailed documentation and guides, reflecting a comprehensive approach to user enablement. For organizations with intricate email architectures, having access to this level of expert support is a significant advantage, helping ensure smooth DMARC deployment and ongoing optimization.
Centera DMARC Compliance offers dedicated support for its DMARC-focused platform. While less is publicly known about the breadth of their support, our interactions suggest a competent team focused on DMARC-related queries. Their support is likely tailored to guide users through the specific challenges of DMARC implementation and policy adjustments.
Given its specialized nature, Centera's support is expected to be proficient in addressing common DMARC issues, from report interpretation to record configuration. For users primarily seeking DMARC expertise, their focused support model can be efficient in resolving specific authentication and deliverability concerns.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
LetsDMARC is particularly well-suited for larger organizations (enterprise) and managed service providers (MSPs) who need an integrated approach to email security. Its comprehensive feature set, encompassing DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and broader email threat protection, makes it ideal for environments requiring a unified security posture. SMBs might find it more robust than strictly necessary, but still beneficial for future scaling.
For MSPs, its multi-tenancy capabilities and extensive reporting are valuable for managing DMARC compliance across multiple client domains. Enterprises will appreciate its scalability, integration options, and the depth of its security features, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing a holistic email security solution.
Centera DMARC Compliance is an excellent choice for businesses of all sizes, from small to medium businesses (SMBs) to larger enterprises, that primarily need a dedicated and straightforward DMARC solution. Its focus on DMARC makes it less overwhelming for teams with limited resources or specific DMARC enforcement goals.
While it lacks the broader security suite of LetsDMARC, its simplicity and effectiveness in DMARC management can be a significant advantage for SMBs and organizations that already have other security solutions in place or prefer a modular approach. MSPs might find it useful for clients with less complex needs or as a specialized DMARC add-on.

How does LetsDMARC compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, LetsDMARC's comprehensive nature means a potentially steeper learning curve for users new to email security platforms. Its pricing model also requires direct contact, which can be a hurdle for quick assessments. For Centera DMARC Compliance, the primary limitation is its specialized focus. While excellent for DMARC, it lacks the broader email security features that LetsDMARC offers, which might necessitate additional tools for a complete security strategy.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Intuitive and easy-to-use software
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC? The clarity of the instructions provided of the various steps What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC? some graphic settings are not retained when changing pages What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Managing SPF, DMARK and DKIM of various sites in a single platform
Massimo G.
System Administrator Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Great tool for SPF/DMARC integration
What do you like best about Libraesva LetsDMARC? Ease of use, useful dashboard. Setup was simple and fast. Customer support is at the top. What do you dislike about Libraesva LetsDMARC? At the moment there is nothing to report about what dislike What problems is Libraesva LetsDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? SPF lookup solved fat with LetsDMARC
Marco P.
System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

Both LetsDMARC and Centera DMARC Compliance opt for custom pricing models, requiring direct contact for quotes, which means no transparent, publicly available pricing tiers to compare directly.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with LetsDMARC or Centera DMARC Compliance?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions