Suped

KDmarc vs Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense

Choose KDmarc for focused DMARC reporting, Proofpoint EFD for comprehensive email fraud defense.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers a streamlined approach to DMARC reporting, focusing on core authentication protocols to help domain owners achieve DMARC enforcement. Its feature set is designed for clarity and efficiency in understanding email flows, identifying unauthorized senders, and moving towards a reject policy. We found its dashboard provides a clear overview of DMARC compliance, allowing users to quickly assess their sending domains' health.
The platform includes robust tools for aggregating DMARC reports, visualizing data, and pinpointing authentication failures. It supports SPF and DKIM alignment, which are crucial for DMARC success. While it primarily concentrates on DMARC, it integrates essential elements for a complete email authentication strategy, making it a solid choice for those prioritizing DMARC implementation and monitoring.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense (EFD) goes beyond standard DMARC reporting, embedding DMARC capabilities within a broader email security ecosystem. It provides comprehensive fraud protection, including detailed analysis of lookalike domains and supplier risks, aiming to safeguard an organization's brand reputation. The DMARC features are robust, streamlining deployment with dedicated consultant support and guided workflows.
EFD includes advanced hosted authentication services for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, designed to overcome technical limitations like the 10-lookup limit for SPF. Its integration with Proofpoint's secure email gateway allows for enforcement of DMARC on inbound traffic, offering a holistic view of email security. This product is clearly built for organizations seeking extensive protection against various forms of email fraud, not just DMARC enforcement.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc generally offers a straightforward user experience. Its interface is clean and intuitive, making it relatively easy to navigate for users focused solely on DMARC. Setting up new domains and configuring DMARC records is a guided process, which helps in avoiding common misconfigurations. The dashboards present data clearly, often with visual aids that help in quickly grasping compliance status and issues.
We found that for users who are new to DMARC or prefer a less cluttered environment, KDmarc's simplicity is a significant advantage. The learning curve is manageable, and the focus on core DMARC functions means there are fewer distractions. Data aggregation and reporting are automated, reducing the manual effort required to monitor email authentication.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, as part of a larger security suite, can present a more complex user experience. While it offers powerful capabilities, the interface might be less intuitive for those accustomed to simpler, standalone DMARC tools. Some users report that configuration and implementation can be challenging, requiring a deeper understanding of email security concepts or reliance on Proofpoint's support.
The extensive features, such as comprehensive domain discovery and supplier risk visibility, are powerful but can also contribute to a steeper learning curve. However, for organizations already using other Proofpoint products, the integrated experience can be a plus. Despite the initial complexity, once configured, daily monitoring for DMARC compliance and fraud defense is manageable, though releasing legitimate emails from quarantine can sometimes be delayed.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc typically offers standard support channels, including email and sometimes live chat, to assist users with their DMARC setup and ongoing management. Our experience suggests that their support is knowledgeable, particularly for DMARC-specific issues. Given its focused nature, resolution times for DMARC-related queries are generally efficient.
For most small to medium-sized businesses or those with in-house DMARC expertise, KDmarc's support model is usually sufficient. They provide documentation and guides that can help users troubleshoot common problems independently, contributing to a self-service friendly environment.
Proofpoint, being an enterprise-grade solution, offers comprehensive support, often including dedicated consultants for DMARC deployment and project plans. This level of white-glove service is particularly beneficial for large organizations with complex email infrastructures. However, some user reviews mention that support responsiveness can be inconsistent, occasionally requiring follow-ups.
Despite potential delays, the expertise of the Proofpoint team, especially for complex integrations or advanced fraud scenarios, is generally high. Their support is equipped to handle a wide range of email security challenges beyond just DMARC, providing valuable assistance for broader security strategies. For organizations needing hands-on guidance through DMARC implementation and advanced security configurations, Proofpoint's support model is robust.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that need a dedicated, efficient DMARC reporting solution without the added complexity of a full-fledged email security suite. It's suitable for companies that want to gain control over their email sending domains and achieve DMARC enforcement effectively. We find it works well for organizations with a clear focus on email authentication.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), KDmarc can be a good option for managing DMARC for multiple clients if they prioritize simplicity and core DMARC functionality. Enterprise clients might find it suitable for specific DMARC initiatives, though they might eventually seek a more integrated solution if their needs expand to broader email fraud defense. It's less geared towards organizations needing extensive anti-phishing or brand protection beyond DMARC's scope.
Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense is primarily designed for large enterprises and organizations with complex email security requirements, extensive brand protection concerns, and a need for integrated fraud defense. Its robust features, including comprehensive domain discovery, supplier risk visibility, and integration with other Proofpoint products, cater to sophisticated security infrastructures. It's ideal for those seeking to protect against various forms of email fraud beyond simple DMARC enforcement.
MSPs serving enterprise clients would find Proofpoint EFD beneficial due to its advanced capabilities and comprehensive security offerings, although the learning curve could be higher. While powerful for enterprises, it may be overkill for many SMBs, who might find its extensive features and potentially higher cost more than they require for basic DMARC monitoring. It provides substantial benefits for those willing to invest in a complete, high-security solution.

How does KDmarc compare with Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

KDmarc's primary drawback is its narrower focus, which, while beneficial for DMARC-specific needs, means it doesn't offer the broader email fraud defense capabilities of a more comprehensive suite. Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense, conversely, sometimes struggles with user interface complexity and perceived 'over-filtering', which can delay legitimate emails. Its enterprise-focused nature might also be a drawback for smaller organizations.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Overkill
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Great filters for junk and spam. Easy widgets in email notifications to release legit email that is not spam What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Too much filtering. At times, overkill. Filters out legitimate emails. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Protect network from illicit email spoofing. Employees that are non tech savvy that click on fishing emails.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Not sure if it's worth the hassle
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I do like that it auto scans my emails and sorts out the scam/fraudulent ones. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? I greatly dislike having to wait for the flagged emails, that are actually not fraudulent, but something that I am looking for. It does not send me the alert until the next day, and then once its been released and approved, it ends up taking another 10 minutes or so (Max) to get to me. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? I am getting significantly fewer fraudulent/scam emails
Verified User in Construction
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Email Protection by Proofpoint Fraud Defence
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? This product provides email protection for both Inbound and outbound emails from all the domains which help in securing the mailboxes. This adds the advantage of the analytics features alike continuously shows the volume of mails as phishing /secures messages. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Like other proofpoint products this also has implementing and configuring problems as they are not easy to configure in the organization environment. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: This product offers you great security over emails and customers can leverage the support and different product portfolio they offer. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We are securing our emails from phising mails /messages for all the domains and for both inbound outbound messages.
Anjali V.
Cyber Security Analyst Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Reliable tool for spam emails!
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great reliable tool and keep your inbox more secure and spam free. As a security measure this is great tool which prevents from any fraudulent emails and send alerts as necessary. I am currently using at my company and find all the spam emails being avoided. We usually receives too many on our generic email alias and this help in securing. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? It's a great tool, though I find the use of it a very little. Only being capable of avoiding spam emails. Also the dashboard is not much interactive Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: It was always better to have precaution than being penalized by unwanted threat. It's always good to be more secure and spam free and take preventive steps towards running your business securely. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? We consider our emails to be safe and spam free. And probably easy to set up
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
We use it as our Email Proxy.
What do you like best about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? Ability to filter by most likely spam emails. We also have the ability to open up domains. What do you dislike about Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense? The UI can be a bit more intuitive if it was up to me. Recommendations to others considering Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense: I would recommend for the ease of use and security features offered. What problems is Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense solving and how is that benefiting you? Fraud emails and Spam emails for our Enterprise account.
Verified User in Computer & Network Security
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

Both KDmarc and Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense do not publicly list their pricing, requiring direct contact for quotes based on specific needs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or Proofpoint Email Fraud Defense?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions