Suped

KDmarc vs Netcraft Fraud Detection

Choose KDmarc for granular DMARC reporting, choose Netcraft Fraud Detection for broad security intelligence.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc focuses on delivering comprehensive DMARC reporting and analysis, providing users with a clear overview of their email authentication status. The platform excels in visualising DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, making it straightforward to identify legitimate and fraudulent email sources.
We found KDmarc's interface to be effective for dissecting complex DMARC data, allowing for easy identification of senders failing SPF or DKIM, and providing the tools necessary to move towards a DMARC enforcement policy. It’s built for DMARC first, giving dedicated attention to the nuances of email authentication protocols.
Netcraft Fraud Detection offers a broader suite of services that extend beyond DMARC, encompassing brand protection, anti-phishing, and overall threat intelligence. While it includes DMARC monitoring, its strength lies in leveraging a vast network of data to identify and disrupt various forms of online fraud and cybercrime.
Our experience shows that Netcraft's DMARC capabilities are part of a larger security ecosystem. It provides the context of email authentication within a wider threat landscape, offering insights into how DMARC failures might correlate with other fraudulent activities targeting a brand. It's a robust solution for a holistic security approach.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers a relatively clean and intuitive user interface that is easy to navigate for anyone familiar with DMARC concepts. The dashboards are designed to present complex data in an understandable format, allowing us to quickly pinpoint issues and monitor compliance trends.
Setting up KDmarc is straightforward, and accessing detailed reports on email sources and authentication results is efficient. For those primarily focused on DMARC, the workflow is logical and doesn't introduce unnecessary complexity, making it quite user-friendly for its specific purpose.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, with its broader feature set, presents a more comprehensive but potentially more complex user experience. Navigating the platform requires a deeper understanding of various security disciplines, not just DMARC.
While powerful, integrating DMARC data within Netcraft's wider security intelligence framework can take some getting used to. The interface is geared towards security professionals who need to correlate DMARC insights with other threat vectors, which might be overkill for users solely focused on email authentication.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc provides standard support channels, typically through email or a ticketing system. We found their documentation to be helpful for self-service, addressing many common DMARC-related queries and setup challenges.
For specific issues, their support team is generally responsive and knowledgeable, particularly when it comes to the intricacies of DMARC implementation and reporting. The focus on a single core product allows for specialized assistance.
Netcraft Fraud Detection, catering to a more enterprise-level clientele, tends to offer more comprehensive support options, often including dedicated account management and direct technical assistance. This is crucial given the breadth of their security offerings.
We observed that Netcraft's support is well-equipped to handle complex security incidents that span across multiple threat vectors, including DMARC. Their expertise extends to a wide array of cyber threats, providing a more consultative approach for larger organizations.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is an excellent choice for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and even smaller enterprises primarily focused on DMARC implementation, monitoring, and achieving enforcement. Its straightforward interface and dedicated DMARC features make it ideal for teams who need a focused solution.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) will find KDmarc suitable for managing DMARC for multiple clients due to its clear reporting and user-friendly dashboard. It's less suited for large enterprises requiring broad, integrated threat intelligence beyond email authentication.
Netcraft Fraud Detection is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with a significant need for comprehensive brand protection and anti-phishing capabilities, where DMARC is one component of a broader security strategy. It's tailored for security teams managing diverse cyber threats.
While MSPs could leverage Netcraft, its expansive features might be more than what's needed for clients solely seeking DMARC solutions, potentially adding complexity and cost. SMBs might find the platform too robust and overwhelming for their specific DMARC requirements.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

KDmarc's drawbacks primarily stem from its specialized focus, which means it may not offer the expansive threat intelligence capabilities found in broader security platforms. For organizations with complex, multi-layered security needs beyond DMARC, it might necessitate integrating with other tools. Netcraft Fraud Detection, conversely, might present a steeper learning curve for users whose sole focus is DMARC, and its DMARC-specific features might not be as finely tuned for ease of use compared to a dedicated DMARC solution. The broader scope can sometimes lead to increased complexity if you only need a specific piece of functionality.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

KDmarc offers clear tiered pricing, while Netcraft Fraud Detection requires direct contact for quotes, reflecting their enterprise-focused approach.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or Netcraft Fraud Detection?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions