Suped

KDmarc vs Everest

Choose KDmarc for focused DMARC reporting, Everest for broader deliverability insights.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers a solid foundation for DMARC implementation and monitoring. We found its core strength lies in detailed DMARC report parsing, aggregation, and visualization. It provides clear insights into authentication outcomes, helping us identify legitimate sending sources versus potential threats, which is crucial for maintaining domain reputation.
Beyond DMARC, KDmarc includes essential tools for SPF and DKIM record management, ensuring proper email authentication. It focuses heavily on the technical aspects of email security, making it a reliable choice for teams prioritizing DMARC compliance and forensic analysis.
Everest, on the other hand, presents a much broader suite of features, extending well beyond DMARC. Its comprehensive platform covers the entire email lifecycle, from pre-send testing (design, content, list validation) to inbox placement, reputation monitoring, and post-send engagement analytics. This makes it a powerful, all-encompassing tool for holistic email deliverability management.
While Everest includes DMARC reporting, its strength truly shines in its integrated approach. We observed features like competitive intelligence, advanced sender certification, and robust API capabilities that allow for deep integration into existing marketing and IT stacks, providing a more expansive view of email program performance.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc's user experience is generally straightforward, particularly for users focused solely on DMARC. The interface is clean and functional, prioritizing data presentation without excessive frills. We found it relatively easy to navigate through DMARC reports, identify trends, and drill down into specific data points, making it effective for technical users.
While the design is practical, it may not offer the most modern or visually engaging experience. However, its simplicity can be a benefit for those who prefer a no-nonsense approach to DMARC monitoring and prefer to get straight to the data.
Everest boasts a more polished and intuitive user interface, designed to handle its extensive feature set gracefully. We appreciated the customizable dashboards, which allowed us to prioritize the metrics most relevant to our specific needs. The flow between different tools, such as inbox placement and reputation, felt logical and well-integrated.
Given its breadth, there can be a learning curve to fully utilize all of Everest's capabilities. However, the investment in its UX is evident, providing a more modern and comprehensive experience that caters to both deliverability specialists and marketing professionals seeking deeper insights.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with KDmarc's support indicates a responsive team focused on DMARC-specific issues. They are typically knowledgeable about email authentication protocols and can assist with technical configurations and report interpretations. Support channels usually include email and sometimes chat or dedicated ticketing systems.
For users primarily concerned with DMARC, the support is adequate and addresses relevant concerns effectively. However, for broader email deliverability challenges beyond DMARC, their scope might be more limited compared to platforms offering a wider range of services.
Everest offers a robust support structure that aligns with its comprehensive platform. They provide various tiers of support, often including dedicated customer success managers for higher plans, extensive documentation, webinars, and responsive technical support. We found their team to be well-versed in all aspects of email deliverability, not just DMARC.
The depth of their support can be a significant advantage, particularly for complex deliverability issues or when integrating Everest into intricate email ecosystems. While some users report initial setup challenges, ongoing support appears designed to help maximize platform value.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is best suited for organizations primarily focused on achieving and maintaining DMARC compliance. This includes businesses of all sizes, from SMBs to large enterprises, that have a clear objective of securing their email domains against phishing and spoofing attacks. It's particularly useful for security teams or IT departments whose main goal is DMARC implementation without needing a full-fledged deliverability suite.
For MSPs managing DMARC for multiple clients, KDmarc offers the necessary reporting and management capabilities. Its straightforward approach makes it a good fit for those who want to tackle DMARC specifically, without getting overwhelmed by additional deliverability features. SMBs will find it accessible for foundational email security.
Everest caters to a wider audience, from growing marketing teams to large enterprises and MSPs managing extensive email programs. It's ideal for organizations that view email deliverability as a strategic imperative and require detailed insights across the entire email lifecycle, including list hygiene, content optimization, inbox placement, and competitive analysis.
Enterprise-level clients will benefit from its scalability, robust API, and comprehensive features, while MSPs can leverage its multi-tenancy capabilities to manage deliverability for numerous clients. SMBs with ambitious email marketing goals and a commitment to optimizing every aspect of their email performance would also find significant value, though the price point might be a consideration.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

While KDmarc is a reliable DMARC specialist, its focus means it lacks the broader deliverability features found in more comprehensive tools. Users might need to integrate other services for inbox placement, list validation, or extensive reputation management. Everest, conversely, can be complex due to its vast feature set, potentially overwhelming new users. Its pricing structure can also be a barrier for smaller organizations, and some users report a challenging setup or inconsistent support experiences.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys
What do you like best about Everest?The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for GmailWhat do you dislike about Everest?Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice.Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now.Recommendations to others considering Everest:Find another supplier, these guys are sharksWhat problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?Helped delivery to MS-based email
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros
What do you like best about Everest?Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metricsWhat do you dislike about Everest?Support is okay, but it could be lot betterNavigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools.Recommendations to others considering Everest:New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere.What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?Improving inbox placementLowering spam complaints
Bryan P.
Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Review after using more than 2 months
What do you like best about Everest?Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking.Quick display the domain reputation status.After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear.What do you dislike about Everest?Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo.Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score.Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate.Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system.What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only.Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues
What do you like best about Everest?I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org.What do you dislike about Everest?The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, BrazeWhat problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
So far not so good
What do you like best about Everest?We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part.What do you dislike about Everest?We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch.Recommendations to others considering Everest:Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process.What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

KDmarc does not publicly share its pricing, requiring direct contact for quotes, whereas Everest offers tiered monthly plans for lower volumes and custom pricing for larger scales, making its entry-level more transparent.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
$20-$40/month
Medium
Contact for pricing
$80-$900/month
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or Everest?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions