Suped

KDmarc vs EmailAuth.io

Choose KDmarc for robust feature depth, or EmailAuth.io for a streamlined user experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features, designed to provide deep insights into email authentication data. We found its reporting granularity particularly strong, allowing for detailed analysis of SPF, DKIM, and DMARC results across various sending sources. The platform excels in presenting raw data in an organized, actionable manner.
Beyond core DMARC aggregation, KDmarc integrates advanced capabilities such as source identification and forward detection, which are crucial for large organizations with complex email ecosystems. Its strength lies in its ability to process vast amounts of data and highlight potential issues that might otherwise go unnoticed. We appreciate the depth it provides for technical users.
EmailAuth.io provides a solid set of DMARC reporting features, focusing on clarity and ease of use. Its dashboard quickly summarizes authentication results, making it easy to identify trends and potential problems at a glance. We observed a good balance between presenting essential data and avoiding overwhelming complexity.
The platform also includes helpful features for managing email authentication, such as guided setup processes and clear explanations of DMARC concepts. While it may not offer the same level of granular detail as KDmarc in certain areas, its strength is in making DMARC accessible and manageable for a broader audience, which is a significant advantage for many users.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with KDmarc's user interface revealed a strong emphasis on data presentation. The dashboards are information-rich, providing numerous filters and drill-down options. For those who enjoy diving deep into metrics and logs, the layout is highly functional, though it might appear somewhat dense to a newcomer.
Navigating KDmarc requires a bit of a learning curve, especially for less technical users. While we appreciate the power it puts at our fingertips, the design prioritizes data density over simplicity. Effective use often means understanding DMARC intricacies, which is a double-edged sword: powerful for experts, potentially intimidating for others.
EmailAuth.io impressed us with its clean and intuitive user experience. The interface is notably user-friendly, guiding us through setup and reporting with clear visual cues and straightforward language. It feels designed to make DMARC management less daunting, which it largely succeeds in doing.
The dashboards present key information concisely, making it easy to track DMARC compliance and identify issues without getting lost in excessive detail. While it might offer fewer advanced customization options than KDmarc, its focus on simplicity ensures that even those new to DMARC can quickly become productive.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc offers technical support channels that cater to users who often require in-depth assistance with complex DMARC deployments. We found the support team to be knowledgeable, capable of addressing intricate queries related to DNS configurations, policy adjustments, and data interpretation. The availability of detailed documentation also aids in self-service.
While response times can vary, the quality of support is generally high, especially for technical challenges. KDmarc's support model seems geared towards assisting more advanced users and organizations that need specialized guidance to navigate DMARC complexities effectively.
EmailAuth.io emphasizes accessible support, aiming to assist users of all technical levels. We experienced prompt and clear responses to our inquiries, often accompanied by helpful explanations that simplified technical concepts. This approach is particularly beneficial for those who are less familiar with email authentication protocols.
The support team is adept at guiding users through the platform's features and troubleshooting common issues, ensuring a smooth experience. Their focus on user education and straightforward solutions makes them an excellent resource, especially for businesses that might not have dedicated email security personnel.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is particularly well-suited for larger enterprises and managed service providers (MSPs) that handle numerous domains and require extensive reporting capabilities. Its depth of analysis and customization options make it ideal for organizations with complex email infrastructure and a strong need for granular control over DMARC policies. For MSPs, the multi-tenancy features are a clear advantage.
For enterprise clients, KDmarc's detailed data aggregation and advanced threat detection features provide the necessary tools for robust email security. Small to medium businesses (SMBs) might find its feature set more than they need, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve than desired for their immediate requirements.
EmailAuth.io is an excellent choice for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and organizations seeking a user-friendly and efficient DMARC reporting solution. Its intuitive interface and guided setup processes make it accessible for teams without extensive email security expertise. We found it particularly strong for quickly getting DMARC up and running.
While it can certainly serve enterprise clients and MSPs, particularly those prioritizing ease of use, larger entities might eventually seek more advanced customization and deep-dive analytics offered by platforms like KDmarc. Its suitability for MSPs is good for managing multiple clients efficiently, though it might lack some of the deeper technical tools that highly specialized MSPs might crave.
Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

KDmarc's main drawbacks lie in its user interface, which can be less intuitive for those without a technical background, potentially leading to a steeper learning curve. EmailAuth.io, while highly user-friendly, might not satisfy organizations that require the absolute deepest level of raw data access and customization often found in more enterprise-focused tools.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both KDmarc and EmailAuth.io prefer a 'contact for pricing' model for their services, which means transparency on costs is not immediately available without direct engagement.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or EmailAuth.io?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions