Suped

KDmarc vs ELK DMARC

Choose KDmarc for managed service, choose ELK DMARC for open-source control.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
When we dove into KDmarc, we found its feature set to be comprehensive for DMARC management. It offers robust aggregation and analysis of DMARC reports, making it straightforward to identify legitimate email sources versus fraudulent ones. We particularly appreciate its visual dashboards that break down authentication results and threat intelligence.
KDmarc includes advanced features like SPF flattening, which is incredibly useful for domains hitting the 10-lookup limit. We also noticed integrated tools for monitoring blocklists (blacklists), providing a more holistic view of our sending reputation, and automated alerting for DMARC compliance issues.
ELK DMARC, being a self-hosted solution built on the ELK stack, provides a powerful and highly customizable foundation for DMARC reporting. We found that its core strength lies in its ability to ingest, process, and visualize DMARC XML reports using Elasticsearch and Kibana. This gives us immense flexibility in how we analyze our data.
While it doesn't come with out-of-the-box features like SPF flattening or integrated blocklist monitoring, the underlying ELK stack means that if we can imagine a dashboard or a data correlation, we can build it. This requires significant technical expertise, but the control over data retention, custom alerting, and visualization is unparalleled if you have the resources to configure it.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our experience, KDmarc prioritizes a user-friendly interface. The dashboards are intuitive, and navigating through DMARC reports, domain health, and threat summaries is quite simple. We found the setup process to be streamlined, largely guided, which is a significant plus for those who prefer a 'set it and forget it' approach.
The learning curve for KDmarc is relatively shallow. Even team members less familiar with DMARC concepts can quickly grasp the essentials thanks to its clear visualizations and actionable insights. It feels like a polished, ready-to-use product that minimizes the need for extensive technical background.
ELK DMARC offers a very different user experience. Since it's built on the ELK stack, the UX is essentially the Kibana interface, which, while powerful, assumes a degree of familiarity with data visualization and query languages. The initial setup is a project in itself, involving Docker, Elasticsearch, and Logstash configurations.
Once deployed, crafting meaningful dashboards and alerts requires specific skills in Kibana. We've spent considerable time customizing our views to get the insights we needed. It’s not a plug-and-play solution; it's a toolkit that requires a skilled hand to assemble and operate efficiently, offering immense customization for those who master it.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our interactions with KDmarc's support team have been positive. As a commercial SaaS product, it comes with dedicated support channels, typically including email and sometimes chat or phone support. We found their responses to be timely and helpful, particularly when we had questions about specific DMARC report anomalies or platform features.
This level of professional support is a strong selling point for KDmarc. It means we have a go-to resource for troubleshooting and guidance, which can be invaluable when dealing with complex email authentication issues and ensuring continuous DMARC compliance.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. We typically find assistance through GitHub issues, forums, or specific ELK stack communities. This means troubleshooting is largely a self-service endeavor, often involving diving into documentation or waiting for community members to chime in.
While the open-source community can be very knowledgeable, it lacks the guaranteed response times or dedicated account management that commercial products offer. For us, this translates to needing in-house expertise to resolve issues, or being prepared to contribute to the community ourselves.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
KDmarc is highly suitable for SMBs, medium-sized businesses, and enterprises looking for a managed, hassle-free DMARC reporting solution. Its ease of use and dedicated support make it ideal for organizations without extensive in-house email security or DevOps teams. MSPs (managed service providers) would also find its multi-tenancy capabilities very appealing for managing multiple client domains.
If your priority is a polished product that provides actionable insights with minimal configuration, KDmarc is an excellent fit. It allows teams to focus on their core business rather than spending resources on setting up and maintaining complex infrastructure for DMARC monitoring.
ELK DMARC is best suited for technically proficient organizations, particularly larger enterprises with dedicated IT or DevOps teams. Its open-source nature appeals to those who demand full control over their data, infrastructure, and customization options. Organizations with strict data residency requirements might also prefer self-hosting.
SMBs without strong technical resources would likely find ELK DMARC overly complex and resource-intensive to set up and maintain. It's a powerful tool for those who enjoy building and maintaining their own solutions and have the technical acumen to leverage the full capabilities of the ELK stack.

How does KDmarc compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering KDmarc, a potential drawback is its reliance on a commercial subscription model, which might become costly for very large enterprises with extensive email volumes. While it offers a managed experience, some organizations might find the level of customization less extensive than a self-hosted solution. For ELK DMARC, the primary hurdle is its significant technical overhead. We've found that setting it up and maintaining it demands considerable expertise in Docker, Elasticsearch, and Kibana, making it unsuitable for teams without dedicated IT resources. Also, without official support, troubleshooting can be a solitary journey.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

KDmarc operates on a subscription model requiring direct contact for pricing, whereas ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution with infrastructure costs.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs
Medium
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs
Large
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, resource costs

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with KDmarc or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    KDmarc vs ELK DMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped