Suped

GoDMARC vs DMARC 25

Choose GoDMARC for comprehensive features, choose DMARC 25 for local Japanese support.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
GoDMARC offers a robust suite of features, extending far beyond basic DMARC reporting. Its plans include comprehensive RUA and RUF reports, IP reputation checks, and detailed DNS history. We appreciate the inclusion of advanced threat intelligence, look-alike domain alerts, and an instant email analyzer in their higher tiers, demonstrating a strong commitment to proactive email security.
For users seeking deeper insights, GoDMARC provides advanced filter reports, MTA-TLS reporting, and SPF pre-validation. They also offer custom DMARC reports and Google Postmaster Tools integration, which are invaluable for fine-tuning deliverability and gaining a holistic view of email performance. It's a feature-rich platform designed to cover many aspects of email security and deliverability.
DMARC 25 appears to focus on core DMARC reporting functionality, providing the essential data needed to understand email authentication results. Our experience suggests it offers a straightforward approach to DMARC report aggregation and analysis, suitable for organizations primarily seeking compliance and basic visibility into their email ecosystem. Its strength lies in simplicity for foundational DMARC needs.
While DMARC 25 provides the necessary DMARC insights, it does not publicly detail a broad array of advanced features such as forensic reports, multi-tenancy, SPF flattening, or specialized threat intelligence. We infer that additional functionalities would likely be part of custom engagements, making it a tailored solution rather than an off-the-shelf product with an exhaustive feature list.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
GoDMARC boasts a very user-friendly dashboard and a graphical user interface (GUI) that makes the complex world of DMARC understandable. We found the wizard-based setups for generating SPF, DKIM, and DMARC records particularly helpful, streamlining the initial configuration process. The clear visibility it provides into DMARC reports is a definite plus.
While the platform offers a wide array of features, the intuitive design ensures that users, even those with limited technical expertise, can navigate and manage their email security effectively. The ability to quickly gain insights from aggregated data contributes significantly to a positive user experience.
DMARC 25's user experience centers on directness and simplicity, particularly for the Japanese market. We observed that the interface is likely designed to be efficient for its primary function of DMARC report monitoring. The focus appears to be on delivering essential information clearly without an overwhelming array of advanced options.
For users seeking a no-frills approach to DMARC, DMARC 25 offers a straightforward experience. While we cannot comment on specific UI elements without direct access, the emphasis on local contact and a free trial suggests a guided setup, potentially simplifying the user journey for those less familiar with email authentication protocols.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
GoDMARC offers comprehensive support options, starting with chat support for free users and extending to email and chat support for paid plans. Dedicated support is available as an add-on for Go-Basic and Go-Pro, and included in Go-Enterprise. We appreciate the responsiveness and expertise of their team, which has significant experience in the email industry.
Reviews highlight the availability of their support team, with some mentioning 24/7 access. Their managed services aspect often includes guidance and training, making them a strong partner for complex DMARC implementations. This robust support structure ensures users are well-assisted throughout their journey.
DMARC 25 provides localized support, which is a significant advantage for its target market. We noted that they offer phone support during Japanese business hours, along with a web contact form. This direct line to local assistance can be invaluable for organizations operating in Japan, ensuring clear communication and culturally attuned service.
While detailed information on the scope of their technical support isn't publicly available, the emphasis on direct contact suggests a personalized approach. For organizations prioritizing local language and regional business hour support, DMARC 25 presents a compelling option, particularly for resolving immediate concerns.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
GoDMARC is highly suitable for a broad spectrum of users, from small businesses (SMBs) leveraging its free and basic plans, to mid-market and large enterprises needing advanced features. Its comprehensive toolset, including forensic reports, threat intelligence, and multi-user capabilities, makes it an excellent choice for organizations with complex email infrastructures and stringent security requirements.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), GoDMARC offers the visibility and control needed to manage DMARC for multiple clients. Its advanced features and proactive alerts help MSPs ensure client domain security and email deliverability. The scalable pricing and feature set accommodate growth, making it a versatile option across organizational sizes.
DMARC 25 is best suited for businesses, particularly SMBs, operating within the Japanese market who prioritize local support and a straightforward DMARC reporting solution. Its focus on providing core DMARC functionality, coupled with direct local contact, caters to organizations that value regional expertise and ease of communication above a vast array of supplementary features.
For enterprises, DMARC 25's contact-for-pricing model suggests it can tailor solutions, but without explicit multi-tenancy or a full feature roadmap for MSPs, it may require custom integration for larger-scale deployments. It's a strong contender for those in Japan needing reliable DMARC monitoring without excessive complexity.

How does GoDMARC compare with DMARC 25?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

GoDMARC's main drawback, as noted in reviews, is its pricing which some find less flexible, occasionally insisting on upfront payments. It also requires some technical knowledge for setup and maintenance, which might be a barrier for complete novices. DMARC 25's primary concern is its lack of transparent public pricing and limited public information on advanced features, making it challenging to assess its full capabilities without direct engagement.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
A Good Domain Email Phishing Blocker
What do you like best about GoDMARC? Its user interface provides easy integration of privacy records, easy to sign up, and serves as the central hub for all domain email-related privacy solutions. It blocks phishing emails in real time, so businesses don't have to worry about them through DMARC, DKIM, SPF, and BIMI records. What do you dislike about GoDMARC? The product has potential for further improvement with the addition of more business use cases, which could expand its usefulness and appeal to a wider range of users. What problems is GoDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? It addresses all phishing-related issues and enhances our brand reputation by providing a comprehensive solution.
Satyam V.
Founder Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

GoDMARC offers transparent tiered pricing with a generous free plan, while DMARC 25 requires direct contact for all paid plans after an initial free trial.
Logo
Logo
Small
$0 (Free Plan) - 2 active domains, 700k RUA/year
Free trial for 1 month, then Contact for pricing
Medium
$60/month (Go-Basic) - 1 active domain, unlimited RUA
Contact for pricing
Large
$145/month (Go-Pro) - 1 active domain, unlimited RUA
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact sales (Go-Enterprise) - Unlimited active domains
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with GoDMARC or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    GoDMARC vs DMARC 25 DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped