Suped

Fraudmarc vs EasyDMARC

Choose EasyDMARC for broad feature coverage, choose Fraudmarc for a focused DMARC experience.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc provides a robust DMARC reporting solution with a strong focus on core email authentication protocols. We found its primary strength lies in its ability to parse and present DMARC aggregate reports, offering good visibility into email traffic and potential spoofing attempts.
The platform also offers support for SPF flattening and BIMI, which are essential for maintaining email deliverability and brand presence. Its dashboards are clear, making it easier to track DMARC compliance over time, and it offers solid forensic (RUF) reporting capabilities for deeper investigations.
EasyDMARC offers a more comprehensive suite of email security features beyond just DMARC reporting. This includes managed services for DMARC, BIMI, SPF, DKIM, and MTA-STS, streamlining the implementation of these complex protocols. The platform provides detailed aggregate and failure reports, enhanced with geo-mapping and subdomain detection.
A key differentiator is its multi-tenancy support, which is particularly beneficial for MSPs managing multiple client domains. We also noted features like IP source monitoring, reputation monitoring, and an 'EasySender' tool for pre-send checks, all contributing to a broader email deliverability and security toolkit.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc's user interface is generally straightforward and functional. We found it focuses on presenting DMARC data without excessive bells and whistles, which can be appealing for users who prefer a minimalist approach. Navigation is intuitive for core DMARC tasks, allowing us to quickly access aggregate reports and identify non-compliant sources.
While effective, some aspects of the interface might feel less modern compared to newer platforms, but it gets the job done reliably. The learning curve for understanding the DMARC reports themselves is inherent, but the platform does a decent job of visualising the data.
EasyDMARC boasts a user-friendly interface with visually appealing dashboards that make complex DMARC data more digestible. We found it particularly strong in its clear categorization of sending sources into compliant and non-compliant, which simplifies the process of identifying legitimate senders and potential threats.
However, with its extensive feature set, the platform can sometimes feel a bit busy, potentially overwhelming new users. Despite this, the guided setup and managed solutions help mitigate initial complexity, especially for those less familiar with DMARC implementation. The multi-tenant capabilities are also a significant UX advantage for MSPs.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Based on our experience, Fraudmarc typically offers standard DMARC support, which often includes email or ticket-based assistance. While the response times are generally adequate, the depth of guidance might vary depending on the complexity of the issue.
For users seeking proactive, hands-on assistance, the support model appears to be more reactive. It is suitable for those who are comfortable with DMARC fundamentals and primarily need help with platform functionalities or specific reporting interpretations.
EasyDMARC stands out for its robust and responsive customer support, frequently praised by users for its speed and knowledge. We found that they offer various channels, including email support, dedicated DMARC engineers, and even proactive guidance during onboarding and implementation.
Their team is known for thoroughly investigating issues and providing clear, effective solutions. For MSPs, they extend dedicated sales and marketing support, along with unlimited technical training, highlighting their commitment to partnership and comprehensive assistance.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) or organisations that require a dedicated, straightforward DMARC reporting solution without needing a broader suite of email security tools. If your primary goal is to gain visibility into DMARC compliance and protect against direct domain spoofing, Fraudmarc offers a focused approach.
For enterprise-level organisations with highly complex email environments or MSPs managing many client domains, Fraudmarc might lack some of the advanced features and multi-tenancy capabilities required for scalable management. Its simplicity is both a strength and a limitation depending on the user's needs.
EasyDMARC is highly suitable for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and enterprises due to its multi-tenancy features, comprehensive managed services, and in-depth reporting. MSPs can efficiently manage DMARC, SPF, DKIM, BIMI, and MTA-STS for multiple clients from a single console. Enterprises benefit from its scalability, advanced security features like SSO and audit logs, and dedicated DMARC engineering support.
While it also offers a free plan for SMBs, the full breadth of its features is best utilised by organisations with more complex email ecosystems or those looking to implement a complete email authentication and brand protection strategy. Its robust support and proactive guidance make it a strong choice for those who need comprehensive assistance in their DMARC journey.

How does Fraudmarc compare with EasyDMARC?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering the drawbacks, Fraudmarc's main limitation appears to be its lack of a broad feature set compared to some competitors, focusing more narrowly on DMARC reporting. This might mean users need additional tools for a complete email security posture. For EasyDMARC, while highly praised, some users noted that the extensive features could initially be overwhelming, and there were occasional hiccups with onboarding or sales support, as well as requests for improved reporting clarity or more direct phone support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Just poor onboarding and sales support
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The aggregated reports are great, as well as the ability to have multiple domain reports displayed in one reporting system. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? I started my free trial after a sales rep gave me a demo of the tool. I added 12 domains to the system. Ultimately, I was motivated to start using the software since it takes some time to set up. After all domains were set up, I reached back out to schedule another meeting (that's the only support available during the trial) trying to understand "what's next". It costs $79 for 5 domains; so I knew 12 domains would cost more, but I couldn't really grasp the business case yet. Why use easyDMARC over not using it? Setting up DKIM, SPF, etc., can be done without it. In the second meeting, my salesperson wasn't helpful at all. She pointed out that she had already answered some of my questions in the first meeting, repeatedly mentioned how important "this all" is, and that their customers are all happy. But I still didn't understand how to use it effectively. How do I go about using this software daily and make it part of my business routine? The conversation became heated when we went through an aggregated report by domain and looked at non-compliant traffic. There was some, and I didn't know what the source was. So, I asked, "What do I do now with this information?" She responded that she is not an engineer and that after I subscribe, I can reach out to customer service, but that all their customers find this all very easy. I had to stop the conversation and felt very disappointed since I was simply looking for an explanation on how to use the information provided so I could build a case for why it makes sense to buy this software for my company. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I was hoping to find a solution that keeps us on top of complience, reporting and data management.
Julius G.
Founder & CEO Computer Software Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Unique Email Security Features, But Reporting Needs Improvement
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The easydmarc platform offers some features that many major email security companies do not provide, such as managed DMARC and managed DKIM. It also includes support for BIMI and MTA-STS. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? The reporting section feels quite basic. It would be helpful if there were an AI feature to improve the wording, such as clarifying that after enforcing a DMARC policy set to p=reject, any non-compliant or threat-sending sources will no longer have their messages delivered to the receiver. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Easydmarc addresses the visibility challenges that often arise when implementing DMARC. By providing a clear list of sending sources, separated into compliant and non-compliant sections, it allows us to identify legitimate senders within our organization—even those that might not be known to the IT department. Additionally, the platform simplifies the process of implementing BIMI and MTA-STS, making it possible to set them up with just a few clicks.
Fariz A.
Executive Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Great for MSPs, but Frequent Updates and Manual DNS Changes Add Complexity
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? Multi-tenanted and easy to use for MSP to deploy managed DMARC for customers What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? The platform keeps adding more features, and I find myself needing to learn how to deploy all of them. It also requires me to make manual changes through DNS, which adds another step to the process. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARC and SPF management consolidated for all customers in a single console.
William F.
Managing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
One of the best UI for analyzing millions of emails
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The UI was the top among the competitors. It makes DMARC analysing task to be very easy. The other tools' interface was very complex compared to EasyDMARC. The support team is also very attentive and they are very quick. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? Their current infrastructure is not enough for the current workload and they are transitioning a new infrastructure to solve this issue which is temporarily. They dont have sub-domain categorization to classify all the sub-domains for their intended purpose. However, they informed that this feature request is on their roadmap. Other than these, there is actually nothing that I can think of being a task-blocker for my daily operation. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? To analyze our large landscape of our email providers that are used for campaings, transactional emails, system notification emails. We are also interested to continuiosly monitor the malicious actors that impersonates our email domains. One of the best use case of DMARC analyzers is to provice a large overview to fix all email records if a domain is missing them like SPF, DKIM and DMARC DNS records.
Serdar M.
Senior Information Technology System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy enough to use for someone who is not familiar with DMARC
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? Its an incredibly straight forward product. There is managed DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS that once added to DNS can be configured quickly! Additionally their customer support is top knotch. I created a ticket, was contacted within 10 minutes, and they answered all my questions. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? This is likely not something they can do based on DNS limitations, but I'd like to see a managed DKIM option if at all possible. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? My company had no DMARC policy in place. This was causing some of our business emails to end up in spam as well as finding spam companies somehow using our domain. While I haven't configured our policy to reject yet, its made the process to get to there much easier.
Verified User in Medical Devices
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

Pricing

Fraudmarc's pricing information is not publicly available and requires contacting their sales team, whereas EasyDMARC offers clear tiered plans with a generous free option, scaling with email volume and features.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (up to 1,000 emails/month)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Plus: $44.99/month
Large
Contact for pricing
Plus: $139.99/month
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or EasyDMARC?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions