Suped

Fraudmarc vs Docker DMARC Reports

Choose Fraudmarc for a managed service; opt for Docker DMARC Reports if you prefer self-hosting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc offers a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting and management features. We found its platform adept at parsing raw DMARC XML reports into easily digestible dashboards, providing clear insights into email authentication results across various senders. This includes detailed aggregate and forensic (if available) report analysis.
Beyond basic reporting, Fraudmarc often integrates advanced capabilities like SPF flattening to bypass the 10-DNS-lookup limit, hosted DMARC services, and tools for implementing BIMI. It's designed to provide a full-service approach to DMARC enforcement, which can be particularly appealing for organizations seeking to offload the complexities of email security management.
Docker DMARC Reports is an open-source solution, primarily focused on providing a self-hostable viewer for DMARC reports. Its core functionality involves taking raw DMARC XML reports, parsing them, and displaying them through a web interface. We appreciate its straightforward approach to visualizing email authentication data.
While robust for basic DMARC monitoring, its feature set is deliberately lean. It doesn't natively include advanced features like SPF flattening, hosted DMARC, or BIMI integration out of the box. Users seeking these capabilities would need to implement them separately or develop custom extensions, aligning with its open-source and self-service philosophy.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc aims for a user-friendly experience, providing a managed platform where much of the technical heavy lifting is handled behind the scenes. Its dashboard is generally intuitive, presenting DMARC data in clear graphs and tables that are easy to navigate for both technical and non-technical users. We found the setup process to be guided, minimizing potential configuration errors.
The platform focuses on making DMARC management accessible. Setting policies, adding domains, and interpreting reports are streamlined. While there's still a learning curve for DMARC concepts, the interface itself doesn't add unnecessary complexity. It is ideal for those who prefer a 'set it and forget it' approach, with ongoing monitoring handled by the service.
Docker DMARC Reports offers a distinctly different user experience, primarily geared towards technically proficient individuals and organizations comfortable with self-hosting. The initial setup requires familiarity with Docker, IMAP, and database configurations. Once deployed, the web interface is functional, but less polished than commercial SaaS offerings.
For users who enjoy granular control and a DIY approach, the experience can be quite rewarding. However, for those new to DMARC or without strong IT support, the initial setup and ongoing maintenance can be a significant hurdle. The interface itself, once running, is straightforward for viewing reports, but lacks the advanced filtering and visualization capabilities of managed solutions.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As a commercial service, Fraudmarc typically offers dedicated customer support. This often includes access to documentation, email support, and potentially phone or chat support depending on the service tier. We anticipate that users can expect assistance with setup, configuration, and troubleshooting DMARC issues directly from the Fraudmarc team.
The level of support from a managed provider like Fraudmarc can be a significant advantage, particularly for organizations that lack in-house DMARC expertise. They are there to guide you through policy adjustments, source identification, and ensuring proper email deliverability, acting as a crucial resource in a complex field.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, relies on community support. Users will find documentation on its GitHub repository and can often seek help through issues, forums, or other community channels. There is no official, dedicated support team in the same way a commercial product would offer.
This model means that while the software is free, getting assistance with complex issues, custom configurations, or debugging can depend on the responsiveness and knowledge of the open-source community. It requires a certain level of self-reliance and comfort with troubleshooting, which might not suit every organization.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is well-suited for a broad range of organizations, including SMBs that need an easy-to-manage DMARC solution without a heavy IT burden. For enterprises, its comprehensive features and managed approach can streamline DMARC enforcement across complex email infrastructures. MSPs could find it useful for managing multiple client domains efficiently.
Organizations prioritizing ease of use, professional support, and a full suite of DMARC-related features will find Fraudmarc a strong contender. It is designed for those who want to achieve DMARC compliance and enhance email security without deep dives into technical configurations.
Docker DMARC Reports is best for technically skilled individuals, developers, and organizations with strong IT resources who prefer a self-hosted, open-source solution. It can be a good fit for SMBs with a technical team and strict budget, but less ideal for those needing hands-on support. It is generally not suited for MSPs or enterprise clients without significant custom development.
This solution appeals to those who value complete control over their data and infrastructure, and are willing to invest the time and expertise in deployment and maintenance. It's a pragmatic choice for environments where bespoke solutions are preferred over SaaS subscriptions, provided the technical capabilities are in place.

How does Fraudmarc compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc's main drawback can be its pricing model, which might be less transparent or potentially more costly for very large email volumes compared to free alternatives. For organizations with unique requirements, customization might also be more limited than a self-hosted solution. Docker DMARC Reports, conversely, demands significant technical expertise and ongoing maintenance. Its feature set is also more basic, lacking the advanced capabilities that managed services typically provide, which means additional tools or custom development are needed for a comprehensive DMARC strategy.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Fraudmarc typically requires contacting them for custom pricing, whereas Docker DMARC Reports is entirely free, contingent on your ability to self-host and manage it.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or Docker DMARC Reports?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Fraudmarc vs Docker DMARC Reports DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped