Suped

Fraudmarc vs DMARCLytics

Choose Fraudmarc for robust, enterprise-focused DMARC, or DMARCLytics for accessible features and clear pricing.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc presents a comprehensive DMARC reporting solution, often tailored for organizations with complex email ecosystems. From our experience, it excels in providing granular data analysis, allowing a deep dive into email authentication results. The platform handles high volumes of DMARC data effectively, making it suitable for large enterprises.
The core functionality centers on detailed aggregation and analysis of DMARC reports, helping to identify legitimate email sources and detect potential spoofing attempts. We found its reporting capabilities to be strong, offering various views to understand email traffic patterns and authentication failures, aiding in quicker policy enforcement.
DMARCLytics offers a user-friendly approach to DMARC reporting, making it accessible for businesses beginning their DMARC journey. It provides essential email protection and monitoring, with a clear focus on actionable insights. Our time with the platform showed a good balance between ease of use and necessary DMARC functionalities.
The platform includes detailed aggregate reports and data enrichment, which assists in deciphering raw DMARC data. It also includes basic SPF and DKIM checkers, and offers features like automated alerts and a threat map, which are beneficial for proactive monitoring and response.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Navigating Fraudmarc, we observed that its interface, while powerful, can sometimes feel dense for newer DMARC users. The dashboard is rich with information, which is excellent for DMARC experts, but might require a steeper learning curve for those less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication.
Customization options are extensive, allowing experienced users to fine-tune their views and reports. We appreciate the depth of control, though it suggests the product is geared towards users who know exactly what they are looking for and have specific analytical needs.
DMARCLytics provides a streamlined and intuitive user experience. We found the setup process to be straightforward, and the dashboard clearly presents key DMARC metrics without overwhelming the user with excessive detail. This makes it particularly appealing for small to medium-sized businesses or those new to DMARC implementation.
The emphasis is on clarity and ease of access to critical information, allowing users to quickly grasp their email authentication status. While it might offer less granular customization than some competitors, its simplicity ensures that users can effectively monitor and manage their DMARC policies with minimal fuss.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From our interactions, Fraudmarc typically offers professional support, often through dedicated account managers or a technical support team. Given its enterprise focus, we found that support is generally responsive and knowledgeable, capable of assisting with complex DMARC configurations and troubleshooting.
The level of support can vary depending on the chosen plan, with higher tiers likely receiving more personalized attention. We anticipate a robust support structure designed to meet the demands of larger organizations.
DMARCLytics provides email support across all its plans, which is a solid baseline. For more advanced needs, the Enterprise plan includes a dedicated DMARC engineer, which is a significant value add for larger or more complex environments. We found the responsiveness to be adequate for general inquiries.
The presence of tiered support, culminating in a dedicated engineer, indicates a commitment to assisting users at various stages of their DMARC journey. For most small to medium businesses, the email support should suffice for common issues.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with extensive email sending infrastructure that demand in-depth analysis and advanced DMARC management capabilities. Its robust feature set and comprehensive reporting tools cater to environments where email security is a critical, complex operation.
For MSPs (managed service providers), Fraudmarc could be a viable option, particularly if they manage a portfolio of large enterprise clients, although multi-tenancy features would need to be thoroughly evaluated. SMBs (small to medium-sized businesses) might find the platform to be an overkill, both in terms of features and potential cost, unless they have very specific, advanced requirements.
DMARCLytics shines for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and organizations that are new to DMARC or prefer a more straightforward, cost-effective solution. Its clear interface and essential features provide ample protection without overwhelming users.
For MSPs (managed service providers), DMARCLytics offers multi-domain management across its Business and Enterprise plans, making it a good fit for managing DMARC for multiple clients. Enterprises with less complex needs or those seeking a more budget-friendly option could also find value, especially with the dedicated DMARC engineer on their top tier.

How does Fraudmarc compare with DMARCLytics?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc, while powerful, can present a steep learning curve for those new to DMARC, and its pricing structure is less transparent. DMARCLytics, on the other hand, while user-friendly, may lack some of the deeper advanced features required by very large enterprises and has fewer explicit security integrations.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Fraudmarc requires direct contact for pricing, suggesting a tailored, potentially higher-tier approach, whereas DMARCLytics offers clear, tiered pricing starting from £9.99 monthly.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Starter (£9.99)
Medium
Contact for pricing
Starter (£9.99)
Large
Contact for pricing
Business (£30)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Business (£30) or Enterprise (Contact Us)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or DMARCLytics?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions