Suped

Fraudmarc vs DMARC SaaS

Choose Fraudmarc for comprehensive DMARC management, choose DMARC SaaS for streamlined setup.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc delivers a robust suite of DMARC reporting and enforcement features. We found its granular reporting capabilities impressive, offering deep insights into email authentication results across various sending sources. It is clearly designed for organizations needing extensive control and visibility over their email ecosystem.
Beyond core DMARC, Fraudmarc extends into related email security protocols like SPF flattening and MTA-STS, indicating a commitment to a holistic security posture. The platform also provides tools for DNS monitoring and reputation checks, which are crucial for maintaining email deliverability and identifying potential threats proactively.
DMARC SaaS offers a more focused approach, concentrating primarily on simplified DMARC report aggregation and analysis. We experienced a straightforward setup, making it an accessible option for users who want to quickly implement DMARC without getting bogged down in advanced configurations. Its dashboard provides clear, actionable insights into DMARC compliance.
While DMARC SaaS covers the essentials of DMARC enforcement, it tends to stick to the core functionality. Features like BIMI support, MTA-STS, or extensive DNS monitoring are not as prominent, which might be a trade-off for its ease of use. It's a solid choice if your main goal is DMARC implementation and monitoring without needing a broader security toolkit.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc's user interface is functional and provides a wealth of data points. We found that while it offers extensive customization and detailed reports, this can sometimes lead to a steeper learning curve for new users. Navigating through various dashboards and settings requires a certain level of familiarity with DMARC concepts.
The power of Fraudmarc lies in its depth, allowing users to drill down into specific email authentication issues. However, the sheer volume of information might feel overwhelming for those accustomed to simpler, more streamlined interfaces. It caters to users who appreciate comprehensive data and advanced configuration options.
DMARC SaaS prides itself on simplicity and ease of use. Our experience indicated that the onboarding process is quick and intuitive, allowing users to get DMARC reporting up and running with minimal effort. The dashboards are clean, focusing on key metrics and making it easy to understand DMARC compliance at a glance.
For users who prefer a less cluttered environment and quick access to essential DMARC data, DMARC SaaS is a strong contender. While it might not offer the same depth of customization as Fraudmarc, its streamlined approach makes managing DMARC policies a more pleasant experience for less technical users or those with simpler requirements.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc typically offers comprehensive support channels, including documentation, email support, and often dedicated account managers for larger clients. We found their support team to be knowledgeable, especially when dealing with complex DMARC configurations or deliverability issues. Their expertise aligns with the advanced features of their platform.
Responses are generally thorough and helpful, reflecting their deep understanding of email security. For users implementing sophisticated DMARC policies or troubleshooting tricky scenarios, Fraudmarc's support structure provides the necessary guidance. They are well-equipped to assist with the nuances of DMARC enforcement and policy adjustments.
DMARC SaaS focuses on providing accessible and clear support, often through online guides, FAQs, and email assistance. Our interactions showed that their support is geared towards helping users navigate the essential DMARC setup and reporting with straightforward answers. This aligns with their product's emphasis on simplicity.
While their support might not delve into the same level of advanced technical detail as Fraudmarc, it is effective for general DMARC queries and onboarding. Users who prefer a direct, no-fuss approach to support will find DMARC SaaS's offerings suitable for managing their DMARC journey.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is best suited for enterprises and organizations with complex email infrastructures, or those managing multiple domains that require granular control over DMARC policies. Its advanced features, such as SPF flattening and MTA-STS, make it ideal for security-conscious entities aiming for maximum email authentication and protection.
MSPs (Managed Service Providers) will also find Fraudmarc's multi-tenancy capabilities and comprehensive reporting valuable for managing DMARC for a portfolio of clients. While robust, it might be an overkill for very small businesses (SMBs) with basic DMARC needs, as the learning curve could be significant.
DMARC SaaS is an excellent choice for SMBs and organizations that need a straightforward, easy-to-implement DMARC solution without extensive technical overhead. Its focus on core DMARC reporting and a user-friendly interface makes it accessible for teams with limited email security expertise.
For MSPs, DMARC SaaS can serve clients who require basic DMARC implementation and monitoring. Enterprise-level organizations might find its feature set less comprehensive for advanced security needs, but for quick deployment and clear insights into DMARC compliance, it hits the mark.

How does Fraudmarc compare with DMARC SaaS?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc, while powerful, can present a steeper learning curve and potentially higher costs for smaller entities. Its extensive feature set, while a strength for some, might lead to complexity for those seeking only basic DMARC. DMARC SaaS, on the other hand, offers simplicity but might lack the advanced email security features and integrations that larger organizations or MSPs might require. Its focus on core DMARC means you may need supplementary tools for a truly holistic email security posture, such as blocklist (or blacklist) monitoring.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Fraudmarc's pricing details are not publicly available, indicating a contact-for-quote model, while DMARC SaaS provides some tier information but also requires direct contact for specific rates.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or DMARC SaaS?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Fraudmarc vs DMARC SaaS DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped