What is the main difference between Fraudmarc and DMARC Report?

Fraudmarc focuses on deep forensic analysis and detailed data for highly technical users. DMARC Report prioritizes ease of use, intuitive reporting, and strong multi-tenancy features especially beneficial for Managed Service Providers (MSPs).

Which tool is better for Managed Service Providers (MSPs)?

DMARC Report is generally better suited for MSPs, offering dedicated plans, white-labeling, and robust multi-tenancy features to manage multiple client domains efficiently. Fraudmarc, while powerful, does not explicitly cater to MSPs with such specialized features.

Do both platforms offer a free option?

DMARC Report offers a free 'Core Plan' and free trials for its paid tiers. Fraudmarc does not publicly list a free tier or trial, requiring direct contact for pricing and access.

How do these tools help with email deliverability and security?

Both tools help by analyzing DMARC reports to identify unauthorized email sending, prevent spoofing, and ensure legitimate emails align with SPF and DKIM policies. This improves sender reputation, reduces the likelihood of emails landing in spam, and protects against phishing attacks.

What kind of support can we expect from each vendor?

DMARC Report generally offers responsive support, although some users report occasional delays for very specific issues. Fraudmarc's support appears to be more formal, typically via email or ticketing, catering to technical inquiries common in enterprise environments.

Fraudmarc vs DMARC Report

Choose Fraudmarc for in-depth forensics, DMARC Report for intuitive setup and robust MSP features.

0 / 5(0)

Compare to Suped

4.8 / 5(325)

Compare to Suped

Compare product functionality

Feature set

Fraudmarc excels in offering advanced DMARC forensic analysis. We've found its detailed reports provide granular insights into email authentication failures, making it a powerful tool for security teams aiming to pinpoint the exact nature of spoofing attempts. The platform focuses heavily on raw data presentation and deep dives, which can be invaluable for highly technical users.

Beyond DMARC, Fraudmarc supports comprehensive record management, ensuring all aspects of email authentication are covered. Its strength lies in providing a robust framework for email security professionals who need extensive control and detailed historical data for compliance and threat mitigation. We appreciate its commitment to a deep, analytical approach to DMARC enforcement.

DMARC Report provides an intuitive and user-friendly interface for DMARC monitoring and enforcement. We experienced a straightforward setup process and clear, actionable insights into email streams. It effectively identifies email sources, detects forwarding loops, and highlights spoofing attempts, making the complex world of DMARC accessible to a broader audience.

This platform also extends its capabilities to other critical protocols like MTA-STS and TLS-RPT, offering a more holistic view of email transport security. Its multi-tenancy features are particularly noteworthy, allowing for efficient management of multiple domains, a significant advantage for agencies and Managed Service Providers. We also find its reporting options flexible and easy to customize.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

Fraudmarc's user experience caters to those who appreciate a data-rich environment. While it delivers powerful insights, navigating its comprehensive dashboards might require a steeper learning curve for users less familiar with intricate DMARC data. The emphasis is on functionality and detailed analysis, rather than a simplified, guided approach.

We found that understanding the full scope of Fraudmarc's reporting often necessitates a solid technical background. For advanced users, this depth is a clear advantage, allowing for precise identification and resolution of complex email security issues. However, those seeking a 'set it and forget it' solution might find it a bit overwhelming initially.

DMARC Report stands out for its ease of use, providing clear step-by-step guidance during setup and an intuitive dashboard for ongoing monitoring. We found that even users with limited DMARC knowledge can quickly get started and interpret the reports, thanks to its visual presentation and straightforward interface.

While many users praise its simplicity and effectiveness, some feedback points to the user interface feeling a bit 'dated' or 'clunky' in certain areas. Despite this, its usability remains high, and the clear reporting helps to quickly identify and address email authentication problems, making it a practical choice for daily operations.

Which product has the best support

Support

Based on our experience and the information available, Fraudmarc typically provides support through standard channels such as email or a ticketing system. For a platform designed for detailed forensic analysis, we anticipate that their support is geared towards assisting with complex technical inquiries related to DMARC implementation and data interpretation.

Given the lack of publicly available reviews regarding their support, we infer that it aligns with a more enterprise-focused model, where clients often have dedicated technical resources. Users requiring immediate, hand-holding support might find the process more formal compared to platforms with extensive self-service options or chat features.

DMARC Report receives mixed, yet generally positive, feedback regarding its support. Many users highlight their support as responsive, easy to work with, and knowledgeable, especially during onboarding and initial setup. This is a significant advantage for users who appreciate guidance in navigating the complexities of DMARC.

However, some users noted challenges in getting answers to very specific questions or experiencing longer response times, with a desire for more immediate options like a chat feature. Overall, the support seems dedicated to helping users achieve DMARC compliance, with room for improvement in speed for highly nuanced issues.

Who should use each product

Suitability

Fraudmarc is best suited for larger enterprises and organizations with mature security operations. Its deep forensic capabilities and comprehensive data presentation are ideal for dedicated DMARC administrators or security teams that require advanced tools for threat hunting and incident response. It is less tailored for SMBs needing a quick, simple setup.

For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Fraudmarc might appeal to those managing highly complex or security-sensitive client environments where forensic detail is paramount. However, it lacks explicit multi-tenancy features often desired by MSPs managing a large portfolio of clients, making it potentially less convenient for broad client management.

DMARC Report is highly suitable for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) due to its user-friendly interface and clear guidance, making DMARC implementation manageable even for less technical teams. It also serves enterprises well, particularly those looking for an efficient way to monitor multiple domains with good reporting features.

Where DMARC Report truly shines is its strong suitability for Managed Service Providers (MSPs). With dedicated MSP plans, white-labeling options, and robust multi-tenancy features, it simplifies managing DMARC policies across numerous client domains. It offers a balance of ease of use and powerful features, making it a versatile choice for various organizational needs.

How does Fraudmarc compare with DMARC Report?

DMARC report analysis

Ability to parse and visualize DMARC aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports.

Source detection

Identify all legitimate and illegitimate email sending sources for your domain.

Forward detection

Ability to detect when emails are being forwarded, which can impact DMARC alignment.

Spoof detection

Identify and alert on emails attempting to spoof your domain.

Notifications and alerts

Receive real-time or scheduled alerts about DMARC non-compliance or threats.

Reporting

Generate custom or standard reports on email authentication and threats.

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data and management features.

Available in Defender and MSP Armor plans

Multi-tenancy

Manage multiple client domains from a single account with delegated access.

Less explicit focus on MSP-specific multi-tenancy

Strong focus with dedicated MSP plans

SPF flattening

Consolidate multiple SPF records to stay within DNS lookup limits.

Hosted DMARC

Host DMARC records on the provider's DNS infrastructure.

Not a primary feature

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Support for Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.

MTA-STS hosting and TLS-RPT reports included in higher plans

Blocklists and reputation

Monitor domain and IP reputation against common blocklists.

Included in MSP Armor plan

AI copilot

AI-powered assistance for DMARC policy generation or issue resolution.

DNS monitoring

Monitor various DNS records (SPF, MX, NS) for changes or misconfigurations.

Monitors DMARC, SPF, MX, BIMI

Self hostable

Option to host the DMARC reporting solution on your own infrastructure.

Free trial/free tier

Availability of a free trial or a permanently free service tier.

No explicit free trial or free tier mentioned

Core Plan is free, trials available for paid plans

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc's main drawback lies in its limited public information regarding pricing and customer reviews, which can make it challenging for potential users to assess its value and support structure without direct engagement. For DMARC Report, common feedback points to an interface that could use a modern refresh and occasional inconsistencies in support response times, though overall functionality is highly praised.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

0 / 5(0)

4.8 / 5(325)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Easy to setup and no errors

3.5 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? Dmarc is critical to email deliverability and the tools they offer make it easier to set up than others I have tried. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? Still need a bit of technical skill to discern the forensic reports. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? Email Deliverability is critical to my business and DMARC report keeps me aware of issues with the authenticity of my site.

Nancy S.

Marketing Consultant Computer Software Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Easy configuration. Clear, easy to read reports.

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? I find the whole SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration of email addresses to be thoroughly confusing. I have a technical bent, so I shouldn't be mystified, yet somehow I am. DMARC Report relieves most of this grief. The website has a clear, logical interface, so it's easy to find what I need. It tells me if I've misconfigured something. It sends me weekly reports of my deliverability stats, which are very easy to read. I'm not currently sending stuff out via mailing lists. I wanted to set up SPF, DKIM, and DMARC so I could be sure that my regular business email was getting delivered. DMARC Report has some advanced reporting of fancy threats that don't concern me yet, because my business is still small. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? The price is high for me, due to my business's small size. The pricing is geared for larger businesses. I hope to grow into needing that much capacity, but they're a bit of an ill fit for me at the moment. If your company is small and you use just one domain name, their Free plan might be all you need. I'm thinking of downgrading to that. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? I need the confidence that my email is configured properly to guarantee delivery. DMARC Report provides reports that are easy to read. I can see at a glance if I have a problem.

Ron B.

Owner Internet Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

DMARC Report is a must-have tool for elevating your email delivery

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? It provides comprehensive insights into all messages sent from your domain, ensuring you have all the necessary information to maintain robust email security and improve deliverability. The detailed reports help identify and mitigate potential threats, making it an essential resource for any organization serious about email authentication. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? Support on a very specific question I had regarding my hosting business was hard to get answered. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? As described it is showing all messages that are being send from your domain.

Verified User in Computer Software

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

A Solid DMARC Management Experience

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? My team and I enjoy the simplicity and effectivity of DMARC Report- it just works. Options are easy to find, the platform does exactly what it says it will do, and the value generated is great. Multi-Tenant capabilities are also a huge plus. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? The user interface needs a little work. I'd like it to ideally be a little more fluid, modern, and polished. It's not a deal breaker and is highly usable, but a touch up would be appreciated. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? Managing our clients DMARC can be chaotic and time consuming- this makes it easy putting everything in a clean easy report with tons of options for us to easily manage and configure our client's DMARC and other DNS settings.

Anthony R.

CEO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Cost-effective and useful solution for DMARC report parsing

4.0 / 5

What do you like best about DMARC Report? Comprehensive email security solution with DMARC reporting, TLS, and more. What do you dislike about DMARC Report? It can be confusing to navigate the menus and occasionally it resets to the default domain. What problems is DMARC Report solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARC reports are largely unreadable to humans, and a parser is a must. DMARC Report has been great for both my own and my clients' domains, providing easy to digest reporting and giving insights into authentication problems as well as spoofing.

MV B.

Founder Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)