Suped

Fraudmarc vs DMARC 25

Choose Fraudmarc for comprehensive DMARC, DMARC 25 for simplicity.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc delivers a robust suite of DMARC reporting tools designed for deep analysis and proactive management of email authentication. We find its interface provides detailed insights into DMARC data, helping users understand their email ecosystem comprehensively.
It supports advanced configurations, including SPF flattening and comprehensive threat intelligence, making it suitable for organizations with complex email infrastructures and stringent security requirements. The platform is built to handle a significant volume of email traffic, offering granular control over reporting and policy enforcement.
DMARC 25 focuses on delivering a streamlined DMARC reporting experience, prioritizing ease of use for core DMARC implementation. It provides essential aggregation and visualization of DMARC reports, allowing users to quickly identify email authentication issues and move towards enforcement.
While it may not offer the same depth of advanced features as some competitors, its simplicity can be a significant advantage for businesses new to DMARC or those with less complex needs. The platform ensures that users can effectively monitor their DMARC compliance and protect their domains from spoofing.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc offers a highly functional and data-rich user interface. For experienced DMARC professionals, the abundance of information and customization options is a clear advantage, allowing for precise control and in-depth investigations.
However, we've noted that newcomers might find the dashboard somewhat overwhelming due to the sheer volume of data and features presented. While powerful, it requires a certain level of familiarity with DMARC concepts to navigate efficiently and extract maximum value.
DMARC 25 provides a clean and intuitive user experience, designed for quick onboarding and straightforward DMARC management. Its dashboards are typically less cluttered, focusing on presenting critical DMARC data in an easily digestible format.
This simplicity makes it an excellent choice for users who prefer a no-fuss approach to DMARC monitoring. While it might lack some of the advanced visualisations or granular controls found in more complex platforms, its directness ensures that users can quickly grasp their DMARC status.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc generally provides support through standard channels, including email and a knowledge base. We find their support team to be knowledgeable when addressing technical DMARC inquiries, which is crucial given the complexity of the platform's features.
Documentation is comprehensive, offering resources for users to troubleshoot common issues and configure advanced settings. Response times are generally good, aligning with industry standards for enterprise-focused SaaS solutions.
DMARC 25, particularly given its apparent focus on the Japanese market, seems to offer a more personalized support experience. We expect direct contact options, such as phone support during business hours, which can be beneficial for localized assistance.
While documentation might be less extensive than global platforms, the directness of their support can be a strong point for users who prefer one-on-one guidance. However, users outside of its primary operating region might experience limited availability or language barriers for support.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Fraudmarc is highly suitable for enterprise-level organizations and Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Its multi-tenancy capabilities and extensive feature set make it ideal for managing numerous domains and clients, offering deep insights and robust control.
SMBs (Small and Medium Businesses) with complex email infrastructures or a strong focus on advanced email security might also find value, but the learning curve could be steeper. It excels where comprehensive reporting and advanced DMARC management are critical.
DMARC 25 is best suited for SMBs, organizations that are just beginning their DMARC journey, or those with less complex email environments. Its straightforward interface and focus on core DMARC reporting reduce the barrier to entry.
For enterprise clients or MSPs requiring extensive multi-tenancy, advanced threat intelligence, or very specific customization, DMARC 25 might be less ideal. Its localized support and emphasis on simplicity could particularly appeal to businesses within the Japanese market.

How does Fraudmarc compare with DMARC 25?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Fraudmarc, while powerful, can present a steep learning curve for those new to DMARC, and its pricing is not publicly transparent. DMARC 25, conversely, offers a simpler experience but lacks the advanced features and global scope of more comprehensive tools, also requiring direct contact for pricing details.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both Fraudmarc and DMARC 25 do not publicly disclose their pricing, requiring potential customers to contact their sales teams for quotes, though DMARC 25 does offer a free trial period.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Fraudmarc or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    Fraudmarc vs DMARC 25 DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped