Everest presents itself as a holistic email success platform, moving beyond just DMARC reporting. It integrates a wide array of features including inbox placement testing, reputation monitoring, email validation, and engagement analytics. For DMARC, it offers detailed analysis of aggregate and forensic reports, designed to provide actionable insights.
Users can expect functionalities like identifying sending sources, detecting spoofing attempts, and gaining visibility into how their emails are delivered across various mailbox providers. The platform aims to consolidate diverse email deliverability data sources, such as Google Postmaster Tools and Microsoft SNDS, into a unified dashboard.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is a dedicated open-source solution specifically for DMARC report analysis. Its core functionality revolves around processing DMARC aggregate reports to visualize authentication results (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) and identify sending sources. It provides the essential data needed to understand DMARC compliance and potential vulnerabilities.
As a self-hosted tool, its feature set is focused and pragmatic. While it offers robust DMARC insights, it does not extend into broader email deliverability aspects like inbox placement or sender reputation monitoring. Users gain full control over their data, as it resides on their own infrastructure.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Everest provides a polished, intuitive user interface with customizable dashboards. We found it generally easy to navigate and interpret the various reports and metrics, though some users report a learning curve due to the sheer volume of features. The platform aims to present complex data in an accessible format, making it suitable for both deliverability novices and seasoned professionals.
Integration with various ESPs (Email Service Providers) is a key aspect of Everest's UX, designed to streamline data flow and testing. Despite the comprehensive nature, some users have noted challenges during the initial setup or platform migration, suggesting that while the daily use is smooth, getting everything configured can require effort.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer, being a self-hosted, open-source tool, demands a higher degree of technical proficiency for setup and ongoing maintenance. The user experience is less about a polished, managed interface and more about direct access and control over the underlying data. Installation requires a web server, PHP, and a MariaDB database, which can be a barrier for non-technical users.
Once set up, the interface for viewing DMARC reports is functional and straightforward, presenting authentication results clearly. However, it lacks the advanced visualizations, custom dashboards, and integrated workflows found in commercial platforms. The UX is geared towards individuals or teams who prioritize self-sufficiency and customization over out-of-the-box ease of use.
Which product has the best support
Support
Everest, as a commercial product, offers structured support. Users typically have access to account managers and customer success teams who can assist with onboarding, issue resolution, and best practices. Feedback on support is mixed, with some praising responsive and knowledgeable teams, especially for strategic guidance, while others report historical difficulties or longer resolution times for highly technical issues.
The quality of support can also depend on the specific plan, with higher tiers often receiving more dedicated assistance. We've observed that a responsive account manager can significantly enhance the experience, particularly when navigating the platform's extensive features or during complex setup processes.
Support for Open-DMARC-Analyzer primarily comes from the open-source community. This means there's no official, dedicated support team in the traditional sense. Users rely on documentation, community forums, and their own technical expertise to troubleshoot issues or implement customizations. While community support can be robust, it's often asynchronous and relies on voluntary contributions.
For organizations without in-house PHP/database expertise, this model of support can be a significant drawback, as resolving complex issues or integrating the tool into existing systems falls entirely on their internal resources. There are no SLAs or guaranteed response times, which is typical for open-source projects.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Everest is best suited for organizations that require a comprehensive, all-in-one email deliverability and DMARC monitoring solution. This includes enterprise-level companies and mid-market businesses that send high volumes of email and have significant revenue tied to email performance. It's ideal for teams with dedicated marketing and deliverability professionals who need deep insights and advanced tools.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs), Everest offers features that can support multiple clients, though multi-tenancy scales best with their Professional and Enterprise plans. SMBs might find the full feature set and pricing to be overkill, although their lower-tier plans offer an entry point for those needing more than just basic DMARC monitoring.
Open-DMARC-Analyzer is an excellent choice for organizations that prioritize cost control, data ownership, and have strong in-house technical capabilities (especially PHP and database administration). It's particularly suitable for privacy-conscious entities or those operating under strict compliance requirements who prefer to keep all their DMARC report data on their own servers.
SMBs with technical staff can leverage this open-source tool to establish DMARC compliance without recurring subscription fees. However, it is less suitable for MSPs looking for a scalable, managed solution without significant custom development, and generally not recommended for non-technical users or large enterprises seeking an out-of-the-box, comprehensive email success platform.
How does Everest compare with Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
DMARC report analysis
Processes DMARC aggregate and forensic reports for authentication insights.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and illegitimate sending sources.
Forward detection
Helps distinguish forwarded emails from direct sends.
Advanced analysis helps detect forwarding.
Basic forwarding insights from DMARC reports.
Spoof detection
Pinpoints unauthorized use of your domain in email.
Notifications and alerts
Proactive alerts for DMARC issues or reputation changes.
Requires custom setup or external monitoring.
Reporting
Comprehensive dashboards and customizable reports.
Advanced, customizable reporting.
Basic, functional DMARC reports.
API
Provides an API for programmatic access to data and features.
Not officially provided, requires direct database access.
Multi-tenancy
Supports managing multiple domains or clients from one account.
Available in higher-tier plans.
Possible with significant custom development.
SPF flattening
Reduces SPF lookups to avoid exceeding the 10-lookup limit.
Integrated as part of deliverability optimization.
Not a native DMARC report analyzer feature.
Hosted DMARC
Manages your DMARC records and configuration.
Part of their managed service offering.
Self-hosted solution, no hosted DMARC.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Expected for a comprehensive email platform.
Not integrated, requires separate setup.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitors and reports on email encryption standards.
Expected for advanced email security.
Not integrated, requires separate setup.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP/domain reputation and blocklist (blacklist) status.
Requires integration with external tools or custom scripts.
AI copilot
Uses AI to assist with analysis or recommendations.
No AI copilot functionality mentioned.
No AI copilot functionality.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records relevant to email deliverability.
Part of comprehensive email deliverability.
Focuses solely on DMARC report data.
Self hostable
Can be installed and run on your own servers.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free period or a permanently free usage tier.
Lowest tier starts at $20/month, trials available.
Open-source, free to use software.
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Everest, while comprehensive, has drawn criticism for its pricing, particularly for being expensive, and for some reported difficulties during setup or migration from other platforms. We've also noted mixed experiences with support, and some users point to issues with specific features like inaccurate inbox placement tests for certain ISPs or challenges with their certification program. On the other hand, Open-DMARC-Analyzer's main 'drawback' is its reliance on the user's technical expertise for installation, maintenance, and lack of dedicated professional support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.2 / 5(189)
0 / 5(0)
Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys
0.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for Gmail
What do you dislike about Everest?
Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice.
Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Find another supplier, these guys are sharks
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helped delivery to MS-based email
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros
2.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metrics
What do you dislike about Everest?
Support is okay, but it could be lot better
Navigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Improving inbox placement
Lowering spam complaints
Bryan P.
Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Review after using more than 2 months
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking.
Quick display the domain reputation status.
After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear.
What do you dislike about Everest?
Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo.
Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score.
Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate.
Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only.
Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org.
What do you dislike about Everest?
The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, Braze
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
So far not so good
3.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part.
What do you dislike about Everest?
We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
Everest offers a tiered subscription model that can become quite expensive, while Open-DMARC-Analyzer is open-source and free, incurring only self-hosting infrastructure costs.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
$20-$40/month
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
$80-$900/month
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted infrastructure costs)
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Everest or Open-DMARC-Analyzer?
4.2 / 5(189)
