Everest offers a broad suite of tools that extends well beyond DMARC. This includes comprehensive inbox placement testing, reputation monitoring (covering various blocklists), email validation, and advanced engagement analytics. It functions as a full-spectrum deliverability platform, not just a DMARC solution.
The platform provides in-depth analysis of DMARC reports, helping to identify unauthorized sending sources and potential spoofing attempts. Additionally, it integrates with other email health metrics to give a holistic view of email program performance, which is crucial for proactive management.
ELK DMARC primarily focuses on DMARC reporting and analysis, leveraging the powerful ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) for data processing and visualization. Its core strength lies in parsing DMARC XML reports and presenting them in a structured, queryable format.
While robust for DMARC data, its feature set is largely centered around this core functionality. It requires users to configure and manage the underlying ELK components, offering flexibility for data exploration but not the extensive, pre-built deliverability features found in commercial alternatives.
ELK DMARC
How easy is each product to use
User experience
ELK DMARC
Everest provides an intuitive, albeit sometimes information-dense, dashboard with customizable widgets. The platform aims for ease of use, centralizing various deliverability metrics to provide a comprehensive overview.
However, the sheer volume of features and available data can lead to a significant learning curve for new users. While dashboards are generally clear, navigating through the extensive toolset to find specific information may occasionally feel complex.
ELK DMARC requires hands-on technical expertise for its initial setup, involving the deployment and configuration of the ELK stack and a Docker environment. This makes the initial user experience very technical and demanding.
Once configured, the interface relies on Kibana, which offers powerful capabilities for custom data visualization and exploration. However, it lacks the polished, out-of-the-box user-friendliness and guided workflows typical of commercial DMARC reporting tools.
ELK DMARC
Which product has the best support
Support
ELK DMARC
Everest offers dedicated customer success managers (CSMs) and a responsive support team, which can be invaluable for navigating the platform's extensive features. Many users report positive experiences with the team's helpfulness and accountability.
While general queries are handled efficiently, highly technical questions or complex integration issues might require more time to resolve. The level of hands-on onboarding and ongoing support appears to vary, as some users desire more personalized daily assistance.
Being an open-source project, support for ELK DMARC is entirely community-driven, primarily through GitHub issues and forums. Users must be self-reliant or possess significant in-house technical expertise to deploy, troubleshoot, and maintain the solution.
There is no formal commercial support channel, dedicated account manager, or SLA. This model works well for organizations with strong technical teams, but it can be a significant barrier for those who require guided assistance or quick resolutions for critical issues.
ELK DMARC
Who should use each product
Suitability
ELK DMARC
Everest is best suited for a wide range of organizations, from small and medium businesses (SMBs) with growing email programs to large enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) managing multiple clients. Its comprehensive feature set appeals to marketing, IT, and dedicated deliverability teams seeking deep insights and proactive management of their email health.
It's particularly strong for those who need a unified platform to monitor not just DMARC, but also inbox placement, reputation, and email content. MSPs can leverage its multi-tenancy capabilities, although some customization might be needed for specific client needs.
ELK DMARC is ideal for highly technical users, developers, or organizations with strong DevOps capabilities who prefer self-hosting and have the resources to deploy and maintain an ELK stack. It's a cost-effective solution for DMARC monitoring if you have the technical talent and a desire for granular control over your data.
It is not recommended for non-technical SMBs or MSPs without dedicated IT support, as the self-hosted nature and lack of commercial support demand significant technical investment. While it can be configured for multi-tenancy, it requires considerable effort compared to commercial, purpose-built platforms.
ELK DMARC
How does Everest compare with ELK DMARC?
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Processes and visualizes DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Source detection
Identifies legitimate and fraudulent email sending sources.
Flags instances of email spoofing against your domain.
Advanced, with reputation checks
Fundamental DMARC-based detection
Notifications and alerts
Provides alerts for DMARC policy changes or anomalies.
Built-in customizable alerts
Configurable via ELK stack (e.g., Watcher)
Reporting
Offers various dashboards and reports for email performance.
Rich, pre-built, and customizable
Flexible with Kibana dashboards
API
Provides an API for integrating data with other systems.
Relies on ELK stack APIs, not a dedicated product API
Multi-tenancy
Ability to manage multiple clients or domains from a single interface.
Designed for agencies and enterprises
Can be configured but not out-of-the-box
SPF flattening
Helps to reduce SPF lookup count for deliverability.
Hosted DMARC
Provides a managed service for DMARC record hosting.
Self-host only
BIMI
Supports Brand Indicators for Message Identification (BIMI).
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Supports email transport security protocols.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors IP/domain reputation and blocklist status.
Comprehensive monitoring
AI copilot
Utilizes AI for insights and recommendations.
DNS monitoring
Monitors critical DNS records for email authentication.
Self hostable
Can be deployed and managed on your own infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Offers a free way to try or use the service.
Free plan for low volume
Open-source and free
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
Everest's main drawbacks include its significant cost, a potentially complex setup process for some users, and occasional navigation challenges due to its extensive feature set. We also noted some users experienced issues with specific ISP accuracy and long renewal processes. ELK DMARC's primary challenges stem from its self-hosted nature. It demands considerable technical expertise for deployment and ongoing maintenance, lacks commercial support, and requires users to manage their own underlying infrastructure. It doesn't offer the advanced deliverability features found in commercial platforms.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.2 / 5(189)
ELK DMARC
0 / 5(0)
Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys
0.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for Gmail
What do you dislike about Everest?
Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice.
Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Find another supplier, these guys are sharks
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helped delivery to MS-based email
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros
2.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metrics
What do you dislike about Everest?
Support is okay, but it could be lot better
Navigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Improving inbox placement
Lowering spam complaints
Bryan P.
Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Review after using more than 2 months
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking.
Quick display the domain reputation status.
After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear.
What do you dislike about Everest?
Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo.
Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score.
Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate.
Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only.
Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org.
What do you dislike about Everest?
The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, Braze
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
So far not so good
3.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part.
What do you dislike about Everest?
We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
Everest offers a tiered, commercial pricing model that scales with email volume and features, starting with a free plan for very low volumes, while ELK DMARC is an open-source solution that is free to use but incurs costs for self-hosting infrastructure.
4.2 / 5(189)
