Everest provides a broad suite of email deliverability features extending beyond DMARC. Its DMARC reporting is part of a larger ecosystem that includes inbox placement testing, reputation monitoring for IPs and domains, email validation, and design testing. We found its DMARC analysis offers detailed insights into authentication results, helping users identify sending sources and compliance issues.
Beyond core DMARC, Everest integrates features like SPF flattening, BIMI support, and even AI copilot tools, which aim to streamline the analysis and remediation process. It's designed for organizations that need an all-encompassing platform for their email program, from pre-send checks to post-send performance analytics.
Docker DMARC Reports, as its name suggests, is a focused DMARC reporting tool. It parses DMARC aggregate (RUA) and forensic (RUF) reports and stores the data in a database, making it accessible via a web interface. Its primary function is to visualize DMARC data, showing authentication results (SPF, DKIM, DMARC), sending sources, and reporting domains.
Being a self-hosted, open-source solution, its feature set is inherently more basic and requires manual configuration for advanced functionalities. It provides the essential data needed for DMARC implementation and monitoring, but lacks the broader deliverability features found in commercial platforms. Users gain control but must build out any additional capabilities themselves.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
Everest offers a polished and intuitive user interface with customizable dashboards. We found it relatively easy to navigate, despite the vast number of features available. The visual representation of data, such as DMARC compliance rates and inbox placement, is clear and actionable. Setting up new domains and integrating with ESPs is generally straightforward, though some users report a learning curve due to the platform's depth.
The platform aims to simplify complex deliverability issues through guided workflows and consolidated reporting. While initial setup can take some time, especially for integrating all its capabilities, daily monitoring and report analysis are designed to be efficient. The overall experience is geared towards providing a comprehensive overview with drill-down capabilities.
Docker DMARC Reports, being a self-hosted solution, requires significant technical expertise for setup. Users need to be comfortable with Docker, IMAP mailboxes, MySQL or PostgreSQL databases, and configuring DNS records. Once set up, the web interface for viewing reports is functional but minimalist. We found it presents the raw DMARC data without much embellishment or advanced filtering options.
The user experience is less about ease-of-use and more about control and transparency. There's no hand-holding, and troubleshooting issues often requires diving into logs and configurations. It's ideal for those who prefer to manage their own infrastructure and have a strong technical background, as it provides the data without the managed service layer.
Which product has the best support
Support
Everest provides dedicated customer success managers and support teams. Many users highlight the responsiveness and helpfulness of their support, especially during onboarding and for complex deliverability challenges. We've seen that while some technical queries might take time to resolve, the overall support experience is positive, aiming to guide users through the platform's extensive features.
Their support model is typical of a commercial enterprise-grade solution, offering various tiers of assistance depending on the subscription level. This includes access to knowledge bases, webinars, and direct communication channels, which is essential given the breadth of the platform's offerings.
As an open-source project, Docker DMARC Reports does not offer formal customer support. Assistance primarily comes from the community, GitHub issues, and the project's documentation. We found that users are responsible for finding solutions to their own technical problems, though the open-source community can sometimes provide informal help.
This self-support model means that users must be self-sufficient and capable of debugging their own installations. It's a common characteristic of open-source tools, where the cost savings come with the expectation of independent problem-solving.
Who should use each product
Suitability
Everest is best suited for organizations that prioritize comprehensive email deliverability management and require advanced features beyond basic DMARC reporting. This includes large enterprises and mid-market companies that send high volumes of email and where inbox placement is critical for business operations. MSPs could leverage Everest for their clients but would need to factor in its pricing model.
Its extensive features for sender reputation, email validation, and campaign performance make it ideal for marketing teams, deliverability specialists, and IT professionals who need a centralized platform to optimize their entire email ecosystem. It's less suited for those on a tight budget or those looking for a bare-bones DMARC solution.
Docker DMARC Reports is an excellent fit for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) or individuals with strong technical skills who need DMARC visibility without recurring subscription costs. It's particularly appealing to developers, system administrators, or IT departments that prefer to self-host their services and have the resources to set up and maintain a Docker environment.
It's not ideal for non-technical users, large enterprises requiring extensive features and formal support, or MSPs looking for an easily scalable, managed DMARC solution for multiple clients. Its self-hostable nature means total control, but also total responsibility for infrastructure, security, and updates.
How does Everest compare with Docker DMARC Reports?
DMARC report analysis
Detailed parsing and visualization of DMARC aggregate and forensic reports.
Comprehensive DMARC insights with user-friendly dashboards.
Basic DMARC reporting and visualization of raw data.
Source detection
Identifies all sending sources that use your domain, legitimate or otherwise.
Advanced source identification as part of broader deliverability monitoring.
Identifies sources based on DMARC reports, requires manual interpretation.
Forward detection
Ability to distinguish between legitimate email forwarding and other issues.
Sophisticated algorithms to account for forwarding effects on DMARC.
Does not explicitly distinguish forwarding, shows raw DMARC results.
Spoof detection
Alerts and reporting on attempts to spoof your domain.
Proactive alerts and detailed reports on spoofing attempts.
Shows failed DMARC authentication that indicates spoofing.
Notifications and alerts
Automated alerts for DMARC issues, policy changes, or reputation drops.
Configurable alerts for various deliverability and DMARC events.
No built-in alert system, requires external setup if desired.
Reporting
Customizable reports on DMARC compliance, sending sources, and trends.
Extensive reporting capabilities across all deliverability metrics.
Basic tabular and graphical reports of DMARC data.
API
Programmatic access to DMARC data and platform features.
Comprehensive APIs for integration with other systems.
No official API for data extraction, requires direct database access.
Multi-tenancy
Manage multiple domains or client accounts from a single interface.
Designed for managing multiple domains and client accounts.
Primarily designed for a single instance per setup, not multi-tenant.
SPF flattening
Reduces the number of DNS lookups required for SPF.
Offers SPF flattening as part of email authentication management.
Does not provide SPF flattening functionality.
Hosted DMARC
Manages DMARC records and policies without direct DNS interaction.
Provides hosted DMARC record management.
Requires manual DMARC DNS record configuration.
BIMI
Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.
Tools and guidance for BIMI implementation.
No direct support or tools for BIMI.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Monitoring and management for MTA-STS and TLS-RPT.
Includes monitoring for secure transport protocols.
No native support for MTA-STS or TLS-RPT monitoring.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitors major blocklists (blacklists) and sender reputation.
Extensive blocklist (blacklist) and reputation monitoring.
Does not include blocklist (blacklist) or reputation monitoring.
AI copilot
AI-driven assistance for DMARC insights and recommendations.
Utilizes AI for enhanced insights and workflow suggestions.
No AI capabilities, purely a data visualization tool.
DNS monitoring
Monitors DNS records relevant to email deliverability.
Comprehensive DNS record monitoring.
No active DNS monitoring beyond fetching DMARC reports.
Self hostable
Option to host the software on your own infrastructure.
Cloud-based SaaS platform, not self-hostable.
Designed for self-hosting via Docker containers.
Free trial/free tier
Availability of a free trial or a permanently free usage tier.
Does not offer a free trial or free tier for DMARC features.
Everest's primary drawback revolves around its pricing structure and, for some, the complexity of its vast feature set. Users also sometimes report challenges with initial setup or integration with specific ESPs. Docker DMARC Reports, while free, demands significant technical proficiency for setup and ongoing maintenance, and lacks the advanced features and dedicated support of commercial platforms.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.2 / 5(189)
0 / 5(0)
Shady sales practice shoot down ok software - don't use these guys
0.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
The software is decent and the validation program works for Microsoft (Hotmail etc) based email, but not for Gmail
What do you dislike about Everest?
Terrible sales practice. Call you within 45 days of renewal, when you ask to change you are told you can't as there is a hidden lock-in in the T+Cs, you need to give 60 days' notice.
Legal but shady, we renewed and then immediately gave notice for next year. They used to be good not so now.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Find another supplier, these guys are sharks
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helped delivery to MS-based email
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Good for Beginners in Deliverability...Could be Better for Pros
2.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Setting up Dashboards to monitor all deliverability metrics
What do you dislike about Everest?
Support is okay, but it could be lot better
Navigational aids are not comparable to other industry-rated tools.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
New to the deliverability landscape, this tool is perfect for you, but if you are an industry pro and understand the ins and outs of deliverability I would look elsewhere.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Improving inbox placement
Lowering spam complaints
Bryan P.
Email, SMS Marketing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Review after using more than 2 months
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
Able to help in domain and IP blacklisted daily checking.
Quick display the domain reputation status.
After using Inbox placement service and domains/IP pools, feel their interface is nice and clear.
What do you dislike about Everest?
Does not provide the IP or domain score with ISP like Hotmail and Yahoo.
Inbox percentage in accurate due to need send to all seed's ISP just able to get the score.
Inbox percentage for Hotmail does not accurate.
Does not provide whitelisting service for IPs. It is just a simple domain blacklisting status system.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
None of the problem have been solving through this Everest. It just a inbox placement display system only.
Easily noticed on domain blacklisted only. Other than this are nothing.
Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
It's been really difficult to switch over to Everest from Return Path due to seedlist testing issues
2.5 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
I like the accessibility to create dashboards and share across the org.
What do you dislike about Everest?
The only downside was that it was extremely difficult to switch over to everest from return path due to seedlisting issues mainly from our ESP, Braze
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Mainly using everest for deliverability measurement. havent had the chance to use it for more since we've been spending a lot of time switching platforms.
Verified User in Food & Beverages
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
So far not so good
3.0 / 5
What do you like best about Everest?
We've been working on setting up since mid-August, but due to issues on the platform side, have been unable to fully set up. That said, our account manager has been responsive and diligently working on getting the issues resolved, so I would say that the user support is the best part.
What do you dislike about Everest?
We're on our third month trying to get set up due to platform issues, which I think is not great considering the price. Return Path set up went much smoother, and we were able to get started right away without a hitch.
Recommendations to others considering Everest:
Prepare for a longer-than-estimated setup process.
What problems is Everest solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monitoring email deliverability is of utmost importance to our business. Being able to see when things take a turn for the worse and being able to react quickly helps us keep our email reputation positive and keeps our emails in user's inboxes!
Verified User in Health, Wellness and Fitness
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Pricing
Everest operates on a tiered subscription model with significant costs, while Docker DMARC Reports is entirely free, requiring only the investment of your own infrastructure and technical effort.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
$40 / month
Free
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
$900 / month
Free
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with Everest or Docker DMARC Reports?
4.2 / 5(189)
