Suped

EmailAuth.io vs ELK DMARC

Choose EmailAuth.io for a comprehensive, managed DMARC service, or ELK DMARC for a self-hosted, open-source solution with full control.
LogoCompare to Suped
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EmailAuth.io provides a robust, full-service DMARC management platform. It's designed to give users a comprehensive view of their email ecosystem, covering DMARC, SPF, and DKIM. The platform excels at automating the analysis of DMARC reports, making complex data digestible and actionable.
We found its active threat detection capabilities particularly useful for identifying potential spoofing attempts and compromised sending sources quickly. It offers detailed reporting that not only shows DMARC compliance but also helps in identifying legitimate senders that might be misconfigured, ensuring smooth deliverability while enforcing security.
ELK DMARC, being an open-source, self-hosted solution, offers a high degree of control and customization over your DMARC data. It leverages the powerful ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) to ingest and visualize DMARC aggregate reports. This means you get the raw data and the tools to query and display it exactly as you need.
While it requires significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, its strength lies in data ownership and the ability to integrate with existing monitoring infrastructure. It's a foundational tool for those who want to build their DMARC monitoring system from the ground up, rather than rely on a third-party service.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
The user experience with EmailAuth.io is geared towards simplicity and ease of use. The dashboards are intuitive, providing clear visualizations of DMARC compliance and threat landscapes. Setting up DMARC records and monitoring new domains felt straightforward, with guided workflows that simplify the onboarding process.
For users who prefer a managed service, the platform significantly reduces the technical burden. We found that identifying and resolving DMARC issues was streamlined, making it accessible even for teams without deep DMARC expertise. The platform aims to abstract away much of the underlying complexity.
ELK DMARC presents a significantly different user experience, primarily because it's a self-hosted solution built on the ELK stack. The initial setup requires considerable technical proficiency in Linux, Docker, Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana. It's not a plug-and-play solution, but rather a framework you deploy and configure.
Once deployed, the interface is Kibana, which is powerful for data exploration but can be less user-friendly than a dedicated DMARC SaaS platform for those unfamiliar with it. Customizing dashboards and alerts demands specific technical skills. It offers immense flexibility, but at the cost of requiring expert-level knowledge to fully utilize.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EmailAuth.io typically offers structured support through various channels, including email, chat, and potentially phone support depending on the service tier. As a SaaS provider, they are responsible for the uptime and functionality of their platform, and we generally experienced responsive assistance for platform-related queries.
Their support team is knowledgeable about DMARC intricacies and can provide guidance on interpreting reports and adjusting DMARC policies. This level of dedicated support is a significant advantage for users who prefer hands-on help rather than troubleshooting independently.
For ELK DMARC, support primarily comes from the open-source community. This means relying on documentation, GitHub issues, and potentially community forums for assistance. While the community can be helpful, there's no official, dedicated support team to contact for urgent issues or personalized guidance.
Users are largely responsible for their own troubleshooting and maintenance. If you encounter a bug or need help configuring a complex Kibana dashboard, you're dependent on community contributions or your own internal expertise. This model works well for technically adept teams but can be a challenge for others.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EmailAuth.io is highly suitable for a broad range of organizations looking for a managed, user-friendly DMARC solution. For Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs), it provides an accessible way to implement DMARC without needing deep in-house expertise.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) will find its multi-tenancy capabilities valuable for managing DMARC for multiple clients from a single dashboard. Enterprise clients benefit from its scalability, advanced features, and dedicated support, making it a solid choice for organizations with complex email infrastructures but a desire for simplified DMARC management.
ELK DMARC is best suited for organizations with significant technical resources and a preference for self-hosting and data ownership. It's ideal for Enterprise clients who have dedicated DevOps, IT security, or SRE teams capable of deploying, maintaining, and customizing the ELK stack.
For MSPs, it could be an option if they possess the technical prowess to manage multiple, potentially complex, ELK DMARC deployments for their clients, though this would involve considerable overhead per client. It is generally not recommended for SMBs due to its high technical barrier and the lack of a simple, out-of-the-box experience.

How does EmailAuth.io compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

EmailAuth.io's main drawback is typically its pricing model, which can become costly for larger organizations or those with high email volumes. We also find that some users might feel a degree of vendor lock-in, with less direct control over their data compared to self-hosted solutions. On the other hand, ELK DMARC's primary limitation is its significant technical barrier to entry and ongoing maintenance. It demands substantial internal expertise and resources, meaning it's not a viable option for organizations without a dedicated, skilled IT team.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

The fundamental difference in pricing is that EmailAuth.io operates on a subscription model requiring direct contact for quotes, while ELK DMARC is open-source and incurs only the cost of your self-hosted infrastructure.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, infrastructure costs
Medium
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, infrastructure costs
Large
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, infrastructure costs
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Self-hosted, infrastructure costs (requires 8GB memory for Elasticsearch)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with EmailAuth.io or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    EmailAuth.io vs ELK DMARC DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped