Suped

EasyDMARC vs Send-Shield

Choose EasyDMARC for comprehensive features, choose Send-Shield for core DMARC management.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EasyDMARC presents a robust suite of features designed to cover nearly every aspect of email authentication and security. We found its offering to extend far beyond basic DMARC reporting, incorporating managed solutions for DMARC, BIMI, MTA-STS, and even SPF flattening. This breadth means a single platform can manage multiple complex protocols, a considerable advantage for organizations juggling various email security components.
Beyond the core authentication, EasyDMARC also includes tools for reputation monitoring, alert management, and detailed failure reports (RUF), providing a granular view of email traffic. The platform's emphasis on "managed solutions" suggests a hands-on approach to implementation and ongoing maintenance, which is beneficial for those who prefer expert guidance through the DMARC journey.
Send-Shield, by contrast, focuses primarily on the fundamental elements of DMARC monitoring and implementation. Its feature set includes DMARC self-setup, monitoring of active domains, and basic to analytical reports. We observed that the core strength lies in providing clear visibility into DMARC compliance without the extensive array of additional managed services seen in EasyDMARC.
While Send-Shield offers "Proactive Threat Monitoring," the overall offering appears streamlined for organizations prioritizing straightforward DMARC enforcement. It includes essential checks for SPF, DKIM, and DMARC. This approach could appeal to businesses that prefer to manage other aspects of their email security separately or are just beginning their DMARC implementation and want to avoid feature overload.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EasyDMARC generally receives high marks for its intuitive user interface and clear dashboards, making complex DMARC data surprisingly digestible. We found the visual layout to be a significant advantage, particularly for administrators who need to quickly grasp compliance status and identify issues across multiple domains. The setup process is straightforward, with managed options further simplifying DNS configurations.
However, some users noted that the initial look at the product might not immediately convey its full capabilities, requiring a deeper dive to understand its value. There are also mentions of frequent platform updates that, while adding features, can sometimes introduce a learning curve or minor UI adjustments that administrators need to keep up with. Overall, once familiar, the platform is very efficient.
Having used various DMARC tools, we can infer that Send-Shield's user experience likely aligns with its focus on core DMARC functionality, aiming for simplicity over extensive features. Its direct approach to "DMARC Self Setup" suggests an interface that guides users through the essential steps without unnecessary complexities. This can be a boon for those who prefer a less cluttered environment.
Without direct user reviews, we anticipate that its streamlined feature set would naturally lead to a more focused and perhaps quicker onboarding process for DMARC basics. While it may not offer the intricate dashboards of more comprehensive platforms, a clear, no-frills interface can be highly effective for managing fundamental DMARC policies and monitoring traffic effectively.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EasyDMARC stands out for its highly responsive and knowledgeable support team. Many users praise the dedicated DMARC engineers and the availability of email and meeting support, which we found to be quite effective in resolving complex issues. The onboarding experience, often involving one-on-one guidance, is consistently highlighted as excellent, helping users navigate initial configurations with ease.
While the support is generally top-notch, some users expressed a desire for phone support for immediate triage. However, the existing channels, including a comprehensive knowledge base and quick email responses, typically meet user needs. For enterprise and MSP plans, dedicated DMARC engineers and sales support further enhance the support experience, ensuring comprehensive assistance.
Send-Shield offers tiered support, with "Basic Email Support" for its Starter plan, evolving to "Email and Meeting Support" for Core and Plus plans. For Enterprise clients, it provides "Premium 24/7 Support." This structure indicates that the level of assistance scales with the complexity and volume of the client's needs, which is a common and sensible approach.
For smaller operations, email-based support is often sufficient, while mid-sized and larger organizations can benefit from more direct engagement through meetings. The inclusion of 24/7 premium support for enterprise clients suggests a commitment to high availability for critical issues, reassuring larger businesses that their email security is continuously monitored and supported.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
EasyDMARC is particularly well-suited for a broad spectrum of organizations, from small businesses to large enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs). For MSPs, its multi-tenancy platform, group management, and white-label reporting features make it an excellent choice for managing DMARC across multiple client domains. Enterprises benefit from advanced features like SSO, audit logs, and dedicated DMARC engineers, enabling full DMARC implementation and comprehensive security.
Small to mid-sized businesses (SMBs) also find EasyDMARC beneficial due to its intuitive interface and managed solutions for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS, which simplify complex email security tasks. Its robust feature set and scalable plans make it a versatile option for any organization looking for extensive email authentication management and proactive protection against spoofing and phishing.
Send-Shield caters effectively to small businesses (SMBs) that require straightforward DMARC implementation and monitoring without the overhead of advanced features. Its Starter and Core plans are ideal for organizations with minimal to moderate email traffic and a focus on getting DMARC correctly configured and maintained. The self-setup option makes it accessible for teams that prefer a hands-on approach.
For larger enterprises, Send-Shield's Plus and Enterprise plans offer increased message volumes, more active domains, and advanced reporting. While it doesn't explicitly highlight MSP-specific features like multi-tenancy, its tiered domain and email volume limits can accommodate larger organizations. It is best for those seeking a focused DMARC solution rather than an all-encompassing email security platform.

How does EasyDMARC compare with Send-Shield?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When assessing the drawbacks, we noted EasyDMARC's tendency for frequent updates, which can be a double-edged sword, and occasional confusion during the initial setup phase or with CNAME records. Some users also felt a push towards more costly plans. For Send-Shield, the primary drawback is the relative lack of publicly available user feedback, making a detailed assessment of its weaknesses challenging. Its feature set, while solid for core DMARC, may also be perceived as limited compared to more comprehensive platforms.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
Just poor onboarding and sales support
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The aggregated reports are great, as well as the ability to have multiple domain reports displayed in one reporting system. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? I started my free trial after a sales rep gave me a demo of the tool. I added 12 domains to the system. Ultimately, I was motivated to start using the software since it takes some time to set up. After all domains were set up, I reached back out to schedule another meeting (that's the only support available during the trial) trying to understand "what's next". It costs $79 for 5 domains; so I knew 12 domains would cost more, but I couldn't really grasp the business case yet. Why use easyDMARC over not using it? Setting up DKIM, SPF, etc., can be done without it. In the second meeting, my salesperson wasn't helpful at all. She pointed out that she had already answered some of my questions in the first meeting, repeatedly mentioned how important "this all" is, and that their customers are all happy. But I still didn't understand how to use it effectively. How do I go about using this software daily and make it part of my business routine? The conversation became heated when we went through an aggregated report by domain and looked at non-compliant traffic. There was some, and I didn't know what the source was. So, I asked, "What do I do now with this information?" She responded that she is not an engineer and that after I subscribe, I can reach out to customer service, but that all their customers find this all very easy. I had to stop the conversation and felt very disappointed since I was simply looking for an explanation on how to use the information provided so I could build a case for why it makes sense to buy this software for my company. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? I was hoping to find a solution that keeps us on top of complience, reporting and data management.
Julius G.
Founder & CEO Computer Software Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Unique Email Security Features, But Reporting Needs Improvement
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The easydmarc platform offers some features that many major email security companies do not provide, such as managed DMARC and managed DKIM. It also includes support for BIMI and MTA-STS. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? The reporting section feels quite basic. It would be helpful if there were an AI feature to improve the wording, such as clarifying that after enforcing a DMARC policy set to p=reject, any non-compliant or threat-sending sources will no longer have their messages delivered to the receiver. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Easydmarc addresses the visibility challenges that often arise when implementing DMARC. By providing a clear list of sending sources, separated into compliant and non-compliant sections, it allows us to identify legitimate senders within our organization—even those that might not be known to the IT department. Additionally, the platform simplifies the process of implementing BIMI and MTA-STS, making it possible to set them up with just a few clicks.
Fariz A.
Executive Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Great for MSPs, but Frequent Updates and Manual DNS Changes Add Complexity
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? Multi-tenanted and easy to use for MSP to deploy managed DMARC for customers What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? The platform keeps adding more features, and I find myself needing to learn how to deploy all of them. It also requires me to make manual changes through DNS, which adds another step to the process. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARC and SPF management consolidated for all customers in a single console.
William F.
Managing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
One of the best UI for analyzing millions of emails
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? The UI was the top among the competitors. It makes DMARC analysing task to be very easy. The other tools' interface was very complex compared to EasyDMARC. The support team is also very attentive and they are very quick. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? Their current infrastructure is not enough for the current workload and they are transitioning a new infrastructure to solve this issue which is temporarily. They dont have sub-domain categorization to classify all the sub-domains for their intended purpose. However, they informed that this feature request is on their roadmap. Other than these, there is actually nothing that I can think of being a task-blocker for my daily operation. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? To analyze our large landscape of our email providers that are used for campaings, transactional emails, system notification emails. We are also interested to continuiosly monitor the malicious actors that impersonates our email domains. One of the best use case of DMARC analyzers is to provice a large overview to fix all email records if a domain is missing them like SPF, DKIM and DMARC DNS records.
Serdar M.
Senior Information Technology System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Great product
What do you like best about EasyDMARC? EasyDMARC lets you gain quick insight in the way SPF, DKIM and DMARC is implemented in the company. It fairly easy to implement with the tools EasyDMARC provides. It also makes you monitor the abuse of your domains and gives you tips to increase the security in your current setup. When we started using EasyDMARC we were in close connection with customer support. They helped us out a lot with configuring the product. Also once we got to know the product we could have meetings regarding features that we thought were missing and some of them are even implemented such as improvements on user management and SSO. All and all a great product with a more reasonable rate than some of the expensive sompetitors. What do you dislike about EasyDMARC? In the beginning there were frequent changes to the platform or UI, which made it hard for administrators to keep up or have the same reporting. It was like they were testing in the production environment. But I believe this is not the case anymore. What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you? Implementing DMARC and getting insight in our domains which shows abuse of certain domain. Having the DMARC reports sent to EasyDMARC and formatting them to something human readable and creating dashboarding around it is just a lifesaver. That way we can act quick and make changes to prevent abuse or reputational damage to our company.
Verified User in Manufacturing
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

Pricing

EasyDMARC offers a notable free tier and a wide range of plans with increasing features, whereas Send-Shield starts with a paid Starter plan, although it does offer a free trial.
Logo
Logo
Small
$0 (1k emails, 1 domain)
£19.99/mo (10k emails, 1 domain)
Medium
$44.99/mo (100k emails, 2 domains)
£49.99/mo (100k emails, 2 domains)
Large
$139.99/mo (1M emails, 2 domains)
£299.00/mo (1M emails, 8 domains)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
From £699/mo (5M emails, 15 domains)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with EasyDMARC or Send-Shield?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    EasyDMARC vs Send-Shield DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped