EasyDMARC provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC-related features, extending beyond basic report aggregation to include tools like Managed SPF, Managed MTA-STS, and BIMI implementation. The platform aims to offer a holistic approach to email authentication, making complex protocols more accessible.
We found its reporting capabilities to be robust, offering detailed insights into email traffic, source identification, and threat detection. The integrated alert management and reputation monitoring are particularly useful for proactive security management, ensuring we stay informed about potential issues.
Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source solution, focuses primarily on parsing and viewing DMARC aggregate (RUA) reports. Its core strength lies in its ability to be self-hosted, giving users complete control over their data and infrastructure, a significant advantage for those with specific compliance or privacy needs.
However, its feature set is inherently more basic compared to commercial offerings. It provides a foundational layer for DMARC report analysis but lacks advanced features such as failure (RUF) reports, automated policy management, or integrated tools for SPF flattening and BIMI, which typically require additional manual setup or third-party solutions.
How easy is each product to use
User experience
EasyDMARC prides itself on an intuitive user interface, and our experience confirms this. The dashboards are well-organized, presenting complex DMARC data in an easily digestible format with clear visuals and actionable insights. This simplifies the process for users who might not be DMARC experts.
The platform's managed services, like Managed DMARC and EasySPF, significantly streamline configuration. With features such as direct Cloudflare integration for record updates and a focus on reducing manual DNS changes, it aims to make DMARC management as effortless as possible.
The user experience for Docker DMARC Reports is entirely dependent on the user's technical proficiency. Since it is a self-hosted solution, the initial setup involves a significant learning curve, requiring expertise in Docker, IMAP, MySQL/PostgreSQL, and DNS configuration. This is not a point-and-click interface.
Once configured, the web interface provides a functional view of DMARC reports. However, it lacks the polish, advanced filtering, and user-friendly features common in commercial tools. For those comfortable with command-line operations and server management, it offers raw data access, but it's far from an
Which product has the best support
Support
EasyDMARC offers various levels of support depending on the plan, ranging from a knowledge base to email support and dedicated DMARC engineers for higher tiers. We found their support team to be highly responsive and knowledgeable, often providing quick and thorough solutions to complex issues.
For Premium and Enterprise plans, the availability of a dedicated DMARC engineer is a significant advantage, offering personalized guidance through the DMARC implementation and enforcement journey. Some reviews mention an initial dedicated expert even during trials, which is commendable.
As an open-source project, Docker DMARC Reports does not offer traditional customer support. Users rely on community forums, GitHub issues, and their own technical expertise to resolve problems. This means no dedicated support engineers or formal service level agreements.
While the open-source community can be helpful, it's not a guaranteed or immediate source of assistance. Users considering this solution must be prepared to troubleshoot independently or allocate internal resources for ongoing maintenance and support.
Who should use each product
Suitability
EasyDMARC is highly suitable for SMBs, mid-market companies, and enterprises seeking a comprehensive, managed DMARC solution without extensive in-house expertise. Its user-friendly interface and managed services make it ideal for organizations prioritizing ease of use and guided implementation.
For Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and Managed Security Service Providers (MSSPs), EasyDMARC offers dedicated plans with multi-tenancy, white-label reporting, and sales/marketing hub support, making it an excellent choice for managing DMARC across multiple client domains.
Docker DMARC Reports is best suited for technically proficient individuals, small businesses with strong IT teams, or organizations with specific requirements for data sovereignty and control. It's an excellent choice for those who are comfortable with self-hosting and have the resources to manage their own infrastructure.
It is generally less suitable for non-technical users, SMBs without dedicated IT staff, or enterprises that require commercial-grade support and advanced features out-of-the-box. MSPs might find it less efficient for managing multiple clients due to the manual overhead per deployment.
How does EasyDMARC compare with Docker DMARC Reports?
DMARC report analysis
Aggregated and forensic reports analysis.
Aggregate reports only
Source detection
Identify all sending sources.
Forward detection
Detect forwarded email traffic.
Spoof detection
Identify email spoofing attempts.
Notifications and alerts
Real-time alerts for policy changes or issues.
Reporting
Customizable and scheduled reports.
API
Programmatic access to data and features.
Multi-tenancy
Manage multiple client accounts.
SPF flattening
Simplify SPF records to stay within DNS limits.
Hosted DMARC
Manage DMARC records directly from the platform.
BIMI
Brand Indicators for Message Identification support.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Mail Transfer Agent Strict Transport Security and TLS Reporting.
Blocklists and reputation
Monitor IP reputation and blocklists.
AI copilot
AI-powered insights or assistance.
DNS monitoring
Monitor DNS records for changes.
Self hostable
Option to host the solution on private infrastructure.
Free trial/free tier
Option to try before subscribing.
Always free to use
Drawbacks and what to watch out for
EasyDMARC, while feature-rich, can suffer from occasional infrastructure performance issues and an interface that sometimes feels cluttered due to the constant addition of new features. The sales approach can also be a bit pushy for upgrades. Docker DMARC Reports, conversely, has a significant barrier to entry due to its self-hosted nature, requiring substantial technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance, and lacking robust support.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
4.8 / 5(135)
0 / 5(0)
Just poor onboarding and sales support
0.5 / 5
What do you like best about EasyDMARC?
The aggregated reports are great, as well as the ability to have multiple domain reports displayed in one reporting system.
What do you dislike about EasyDMARC?
I started my free trial after a sales rep gave me a demo of the tool. I added 12 domains to the system. Ultimately, I was motivated to start using the software since it takes some time to set up. After all domains were set up, I reached back out to schedule another meeting (that's the only support available during the trial) trying to understand "what's next". It costs $79 for 5 domains; so I knew 12 domains would cost more, but I couldn't really grasp the business case yet. Why use easyDMARC over not using it? Setting up DKIM, SPF, etc., can be done without it.
In the second meeting, my salesperson wasn't helpful at all. She pointed out that she had already answered some of my questions in the first meeting, repeatedly mentioned how important "this all" is, and that their customers are all happy. But I still didn't understand how to use it effectively. How do I go about using this software daily and make it part of my business routine?
The conversation became heated when we went through an aggregated report by domain and looked at non-compliant traffic. There was some, and I didn't know what the source was. So, I asked, "What do I do now with this information?" She responded that she is not an engineer and that after I subscribe, I can reach out to customer service, but that all their customers find this all very easy.
I had to stop the conversation and felt very disappointed since I was simply looking for an explanation on how to use the information provided so I could build a case for why it makes sense to buy this software for my company.
What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
I was hoping to find a solution that keeps us on top of complience, reporting and data management.
Julius G.
Founder & CEO Computer Software Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
Unique Email Security Features, But Reporting Needs Improvement
3.5 / 5
What do you like best about EasyDMARC?
The easydmarc platform offers some features that many major email security companies do not provide, such as managed DMARC and managed DKIM. It also includes support for BIMI and MTA-STS.
What do you dislike about EasyDMARC?
The reporting section feels quite basic. It would be helpful if there were an AI feature to improve the wording, such as clarifying that after enforcing a DMARC policy set to p=reject, any non-compliant or threat-sending sources will no longer have their messages delivered to the receiver.
What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
Easydmarc addresses the visibility challenges that often arise when implementing DMARC. By providing a clear list of sending sources, separated into compliant and non-compliant sections, it allows us to identify legitimate senders within our organization—even those that might not be known to the IT department. Additionally, the platform simplifies the process of implementing BIMI and MTA-STS, making it possible to set them up with just a few clicks.
Fariz A.
Executive Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Great for MSPs, but Frequent Updates and Manual DNS Changes Add Complexity
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about EasyDMARC?
Multi-tenanted and easy to use for MSP to deploy managed DMARC for customers
What do you dislike about EasyDMARC?
The platform keeps adding more features, and I find myself needing to learn how to deploy all of them. It also requires me to make manual changes through DNS, which adds another step to the process.
What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
DMARC and SPF management consolidated for all customers in a single console.
William F.
Managing Director Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
One of the best UI for analyzing millions of emails
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about EasyDMARC?
The UI was the top among the competitors. It makes DMARC analysing task to be very easy. The other tools' interface was very complex compared to EasyDMARC. The support team is also very attentive and they are very quick.
What do you dislike about EasyDMARC?
Their current infrastructure is not enough for the current workload and they are transitioning a new infrastructure to solve this issue which is temporarily. They dont have sub-domain categorization to classify all the sub-domains for their intended purpose. However, they informed that this feature request is on their roadmap. Other than these, there is actually nothing that I can think of being a task-blocker for my daily operation.
What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
To analyze our large landscape of our email providers that are used for campaings, transactional emails, system notification emails. We are also interested to continuiosly monitor the malicious actors that impersonates our email domains. One of the best use case of DMARC analyzers is to provice a large overview to fix all email records if a domain is missing them like SPF, DKIM and DMARC DNS records.
Serdar M.
Senior Information Technology System Engineer Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Easy enough to use for someone who is not familiar with DMARC
4.0 / 5
What do you like best about EasyDMARC?
Its an incredibly straight forward product. There is managed DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS that once added to DNS can be configured quickly!
Additionally their customer support is top knotch. I created a ticket, was contacted within 10 minutes, and they answered all my questions.
What do you dislike about EasyDMARC?
This is likely not something they can do based on DNS limitations, but I'd like to see a managed DKIM option if at all possible.
What problems is EasyDMARC solving and how is that benefiting you?
My company had no DMARC policy in place. This was causing some of our business emails to end up in spam as well as finding spam companies somehow using our domain. While I haven't configured our policy to reject yet, its made the process to get to there much easier.
Verified User in Medical Devices
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Pricing
EasyDMARC offers tiered pricing based on email volume and features, with annual discounts, whereas Docker DMARC Reports is free but requires significant self-hosting investment.
Small
Up to 10k emails / month
$0 (1k emails)
Free (self-hosted)
Medium
Up to 100k emails / month
$44.99/month
Free (self-hosted)
Large
Up to 1 million emails / month
$139.99/month
Free (self-hosted)
Enterprise
Over 1 million emails / month
Contact for pricing
Free (self-hosted)
Suped hard sell incoming!
Still not satisfied with EasyDMARC or Docker DMARC Reports?