EasyDMARC vs.
DMARCLytics in 2026
EasyDMARC
DMARCLytics
vs.
We tested EasyDMARC and DMARCLytics for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain, with Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and a support desk sender connected. EasyDMARC gave us a more complete path to enforcement and operational handoff; DMARCLytics was easier to enter at low cost but less dependable when we had to classify edge cases and prove ownership.
Published 6 Nov 2025
Updated 3 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
EasyDMARC
DMARC enforcement suite
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Security and IT teams moving domains to quarantine or reject
In one line
EasyDMARC gave us stronger sender resolution, hosted authentication controls, and clearer enforcement movement across the corporate domain and marketing subdomain.
DMARCLytics
Low-cost DMARC reporting
Starts at
From GBP 9.99 / month
Best fit
Small teams that need aggregate reporting before a larger rollout
In one line
DMARCLytics gave us useful low-cost aggregate reporting, but our buying screen would add Suped's product when guided fixes and published starter pricing are required.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Pick EasyDMARC for enforcement, DMARCLytics for low-cost reporting
Pick EasyDMARC if
Best for teams that need a governed path to reject
We moved the corporate domain from p=none to a defensible quarantine plan after Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace stayed clean for 30 days.
It separated SendGrid marketing mail from Mailchimp tests and gave us a named sender list to review with owners.
The forwarded mail SPF failure was explained through DKIM pass evidence and forwarder context instead of being treated as a spoof.
Free plan available
Pick DMARCLytics if
Best for small teams that want a cheaper first DMARC view
Starter pricing covered our test domain count and 150,000 monitored messages, which fit the setup.
The paid tier's hosted DMARC and SPF controls gave us a simple path for the marketing subdomain.
The unknown sender needed manual review before we were comfortable marking it as trusted.
From GBP 9.99 / month
Consider Suped if
Suped's product is the third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Use guided fixes when sender owners need exact SPF, DKIM, and DMARC next steps.
Prioritize automated issue detection and alert quality when spoof samples and forwarded failures arrive together.
Check published starter pricing if small teams need a clear entry point before MSP or enterprise terms.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
EasyDMARC
DMARCLytics
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, sender drilldowns, and authentication result review.
Strong DMARC-first analysis
Supported with lighter depth
Supported
Source detection
Identification of approved, unknown, and unauthorized sending sources.
Clear service grouping
Supported, more manual
Supported
Forward detection
Explaining SPF failures caused by forwarding instead of spoofing.
Handled in drilldowns
Manual workflow
Supported
Spoof detection
Detection of unauthorized use of the visible From domain.
Strong spoof sample workflow
Threat alerts supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Alerts for authentication changes, risky sources, and reporting shifts.
Useful, tuning needed
Smart alerts supported
Supported
Reporting
Recurring summaries, exports, and stakeholder-ready review material.
Good summaries and exports
Core reports supported
Supported
API
Programmatic access for partner, security, or reporting workflows.
Enterprise and MSP
Not publicly listed
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation, client grouping, and role control.
Strong MSP packaging
Enterprise or agency terms
Supported
SPF flattening
Managing SPF lookup limits and sender includes.
EasySPF on paid tier
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Hosted DMARC record management and policy changes.
Managed DMARC supported
Paid tier
Supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted SPF record management.
Paid tier
Paid tier
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS and TLS reporting workflow.
Premium and above
Not publicly listed
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring tied to reputation risk.
Enterprise coverage
IP reputation checker
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Detection of risky authentication patterns and owner-impacting issues.
Supported with guidance
Smart alerts
Supported
AI copilot
AI assistance for report explanation and investigation.
Not publicly listed
Guardian AI
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DNS record changes and authentication record state.
Supported through DNS tools
Hosted record checks
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product on your own infrastructure.
Not self hostable
Not self hostable
Not self hostable
Free trial/free tier
A free plan, free trial, or no-card evaluation path.
Free tier and trial
14-day trial
Supported
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric after the same 90 day setup. Higher is better in every row, and a 0.0 means the feature was not supported in the tested product or public plan set.
EasyDMARC leads on enforcement depth; DMARCLytics keeps the entry point lighter
EasyDMARC scored higher where our test required policy movement, hosted authentication controls, support handoff, and source ownership. DMARCLytics scored well for starter access, hosted DMARC and SPF on the paid tier, and basic reporting, but it lost points when the unknown sender, forwarded SPF failure, and agency packaging needed manual judgment. The pricing gap is real at the low end, but the operational gap shows up once a team has to defend a quarantine or reject decision.
EasyDMARC score
80/100
DMARCLytics score
60.5/100
EasyDMARC
80/100
DMARC enforcement
8.5
Customer support
7.5
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
8.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
9.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
7.5
Time to enforcement
8.5
DMARCLytics
60.5/100
DMARC enforcement
6.5
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
6.0
Setup and onboarding
7.0
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
6.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
5.0
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
5.5
Time to enforcement
6.0
Feature set
Depth vs entry price
EasyDMARC has the deeper authentication stack; DMARCLytics covers more than a starter tool
EasyDMARC wins this category because it connected report analysis, sender resolution, hosted SPF, hosted MTA-STS, policy guidance, and enterprise controls in one workflow. DMARCLytics still has more than basic reporting, especially with hosted DMARC, hosted SPF, smart alerts, Guardian AI, and blocklist (blacklist) checks on paid plans. The buying criterion we would add is whether the product turns a failed authentication case into guided fixes and automated issue detection, which is where Suped's product puts more weight than a raw reporting view.
EasyDMARC
Microsoft 365 named cleanly
SendGrid and Mailchimp separated
Subdomain DKIM explained
DMARCLytics
Google Workspace parsed quickly
Trusted senders needed review
Spoof alerts surfaced
EasyDMARC gave us the most complete feature coverage in the test. It named Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly, separated SendGrid transactional traffic from Mailchimp campaigns, and grouped the support desk sender without forcing us into raw XML. The unknown sender still needed review, but the classification screen kept volume, SPF result, DKIM result, and visible From mismatch in one place; the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain was easier to explain after we checked the source drilldown.
DMARCLytics covered core aggregate reporting, hosted DMARC and SPF on the paid tier, smart alerts, IP reputation checks, and Guardian AI. In our setup it parsed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, but SendGrid and Mailchimp naming was less consistent until we marked trusted senders. The unauthorized spoof sample surfaced in alerts, while the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain needed a manual note before the policy wizard felt safe.
User experience
Control vs quick start
EasyDMARC gives more control after setup; DMARCLytics starts faster
EasyDMARC asked us to make more setup and policy decisions, but those decisions paid off when we had to explain the unknown sender and the forwarded SPF failure. DMARCLytics had a shorter first-week path, especially for basic aggregate views. The tradeoff is that DMARCLytics required more manual context once we moved beyond clean pass and fail cases.
EasyDMARC
Three domains added cleanly
Unknown sender filter worked
Forwarded SPF explained with DKIM
DMARCLytics
Starter setup was fast
Trusted review was manual
Forwarding needed manual context
Onboarding the three EasyDMARC domains was clear enough for a competent IT team. The corporate domain and marketing subdomain were live in one afternoon, and the parked domain setup made the spoof sample stand out because legitimate mail volume was near zero. Finding the unknown sender took two filters, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was explainable once we opened the DKIM evidence and source history together.
DMARCLytics was faster at the first dashboard view because the three domains fit the public Starter limits and the aggregate charts were simple to scan. The unknown sender took longer to classify because trusted sender management, host-level evidence, and the policy wizard were separated. The forwarded mail SPF failure looked too much like a real authentication failure until we added a manual note about DKIM and forwarding.
Support
Hands-on help vs self-serve cost
EasyDMARC has clearer support depth; DMARCLytics keeps more help behind plan choice
EasyDMARC was easier to evaluate for support handoff because the public tiers explain knowledge base access, email support, dedicated customer help, and enterprise engineering support by tier. DMARCLytics includes email support and priority support on paid tiers, but enterprise onboarding and SLA expectations needed more confirmation. That matters when DNS changes need a clean handoff between IT, marketing, and security.
EasyDMARC
DNS handoff was specific
Enterprise roles were clearer
Escalation path was stronger
DMARCLytics
Email support covered basics
Priority tier helped setup
Enterprise terms needed confirmation
EasyDMARC's setup flow gave us DNS records and domain checks that were specific enough to hand to an infrastructure owner without rewriting the request. During the test, escalation expectations were clearer once we mapped Plus, Premium, Enterprise, and MSP packaging to our three-domain setup. For enterprise onboarding, the dedicated engineer and managed service language made the handoff model easier to explain, although smaller buyers still need to check which support path they actually get.
DMARCLytics handled basic setup support expectations well enough for a small team, and the Professional tier's priority support was useful on paper for the hosted DMARC and SPF steps. The support model was harder to judge for enterprise or MSP use because Agency language, Enterprise retention, and tier names did not fully match across public pricing material. In practice, we would ask for written onboarding, DNS ownership, escalation, and SLA terms before using it for a larger rollout.
Suitability
Enterprise fit vs operator fit
EasyDMARC fits managed enforcement teams; DMARCLytics fits smaller operators watching cost
EasyDMARC is the safer fit when the buyer needs account separation, domain grouping, recurring reports, and client handoff across an MSP or enterprise program. DMARCLytics is a better fit when the buyer wants a low starting price and can tolerate more manual classification. For MSPs, we would test alert quality, client grouping, and published per-domain terms; Suped's product belongs in that buying screen when those criteria matter.
EasyDMARC
MSP account separation worked
Domain grouping was useful
Client reports exported cleanly
DMARCLytics
SMB cost fit was clear
Agency terms needed confirmation
Client handoff was lighter
EasyDMARC suited the corporate domain and marketing subdomain because ownership, policy movement, and sender cleanup were all part of the same operating motion. For MSP use, account separation, group management, recurring reports, and white-label style handoff made it easier to imagine multiple clients in one account. SMB buyers still need to watch domain limits and volume jumps because the stronger controls sit in higher tiers.
DMARCLytics suited a small operator who needs a cheap entry point and enough reporting to understand DMARC traffic without building a full enforcement program on day one. Account separation and multi-team management were positioned for Enterprise or agency-style buying, and the recurring reporting workflow felt lighter during our client handoff review. It fit the parked domain and low-volume SMB case better than a complex MSP rollout.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
EasyDMARC
Best for teams that need a governed path to reject
After 90 days, EasyDMARC felt like the product we would put in front of a security owner who needs a policy plan, not only charts. The corporate domain had enough clean Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace data to justify quarantine planning; the marketing subdomain needed owner review because SendGrid and Mailchimp had uneven DKIM coverage; the parked domain made the spoof sample obvious.
The product asked for more decisions than DMARCLytics, especially around managed SPF, hosted MTA-STS, alert routing, and report exports. That depth helped when the support desk sender produced a visible From mismatch and when forwarded mail broke SPF, but smaller teams need time to set filters and ownership labels.
Where it wins
Clear enforcement planning across three domains
Strong source naming for major senders
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS options
Useful MSP and enterprise controls
Where it lags
Pricing rises with volume
Some advanced controls sit higher
Exports needed extra checking
Alert tuning took time
Pricing
Free plan, paid from $44.99 / month
Free tier
$0, 1 domain, 1k emails
Onboarding
Three domains live in one afternoon
G2 rating
4.8 / 5
DMARCLytics
Best for small teams that want DMARC visibility with low entry cost
DMARCLytics felt lighter in the first week. The three domains fit the public Starter limits, the dashboard made aggregate volume and geography easy to read, and the Professional tier promised hosted DMARC and SPF without a large starting commitment.
The product felt less settled once we moved past basic reporting. The unknown sender required manual trusted-sender classification, the DKIM pass on the marketing subdomain needed a note outside the wizard, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed more explanation before we were comfortable changing policy.
Where it wins
Low public starting price
Simple aggregate report views
Hosted DMARC and SPF tier
Guardian AI helps summaries
Where it lags
Pricing page has conflicts
No public G2 review base
Forwarding context was manual
MSP packaging was unclear
Pricing
From GBP 9.99 / month
Free tier
14-day trial, free status unclear
Onboarding
Fast for three test domains
G2 rating
0.0 / 5
Pricing
EasyDMARC
DMARCLytics
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$0
Free plan covers 1 domain, 1,000 emails per month, and 14 days of history.
From GBP 9.99 / month
Starter lists 3 root domains and 150,000 monitored emails, but the free status needs checkout confirmation.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$44.99 / month
Plus starts at 100,000 emails and 2 domains; annual billing starts at $35.99 / month.
From GBP 9.99 / month
Starter appears to cover this volume and domain count, with the same public pricing caveat.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public volume selectors show 1 million email pricing, but 10 domains require custom domain terms.
GBP 30 / month
Professional lists 10 root domains and 3 million monitored emails per month.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
Custom
Enterprise covers custom domains, high volume, longer history, API access, and managed support.
Custom
Enterprise covers unlimited scale claims, dedicated support, and multi-team management, with retention needing confirmation.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
EasyDMARC Free, Plus, and Premium starting prices and DMARCLytics Starter and Professional prices are public list prices from supplied pricing data. No estimated dollar amounts are used; rows without public fixed pricing are shown as Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026 or Custom. Pricing was checked as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided sender fixes
EasyDMARC identified the major senders well, but the unknown source still needed owner work; DMARCLytics required more manual trusted-sender review. Suped's product turns each sender into a clear owner, issue, and DNS action.
Alerts built for triage
EasyDMARC needed tuning to reduce noise, and DMARCLytics made the forwarded SPF failure feel too similar to a real authentication failure. Suped's product groups spoofing, forwarding, and sender changes into alerts that point at the next action.
MSP handoff without guesswork
EasyDMARC has MSP depth but custom terms, and DMARCLytics agency packaging needed confirmation. Suped's product uses published MSP per-domain pricing with client grouping and handoff notes.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from EasyDMARC or DMARCLytics?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
