Suped

Docker DMARC Reports vs Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer

Choose Docker DMARC Reports for self-hosted containerization, choose Techsneeze DMARCts for a PHP-based solution.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
This solution streamlines the deployment of a DMARC reporting infrastructure using Docker. It bundles the dmarcts-report-parser and dmarcts-report-viewer into an easy-to-deploy container. While it offers basic DMARC report parsing and visualization, its core strength lies in its containerized nature, making it appealing for environments already leveraging Docker for application deployment.
We found it effective for breaking down DMARC aggregate reports into digestible charts and tables, showing authentication results for SPF and DKIM, and identifying sending sources. It is a no-frills tool, focusing purely on DMARC data presentation without extending into broader email deliverability features.
This viewer is a classic PHP-based application designed to process and display DMARC aggregate reports. It provides a web interface for reviewing DMARC data, including aggregate reports from various mailboxes. Its functionality is focused on presenting the raw DMARC data in a structured, visual manner, helping users understand their email authentication status.
We've used it to gain insights into authentication failures, DMARC policy application, and source identification, similar to its Dockerized counterpart. It requires a traditional web server stack, like Apache or Nginx with PHP and a database, offering a straightforward approach for those comfortable with such environments.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Deploying Docker DMARC Reports requires familiarity with Docker and command-line interfaces. Once the container is running and configured with a database and DMARC mailbox, the web interface is fairly intuitive for viewing reports. The initial setup can be daunting for those new to containerization, but the operational experience is smooth.
The interface, derived from dmarcts-report-viewer, is functional rather than sleek. It provides clear charts and tables, but lacks advanced filtering or interactive features common in commercial DMARC tools. It is a tool built by engineers for engineers.
Setting up Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer involves configuring a web server, PHP, and a database, then installing the application files. This manual process requires a good understanding of web server administration. Once deployed, the web interface is simple and straightforward.
The user interface is clean and presents DMARC data effectively. We found it easy to navigate through reports, although like Docker DMARC Reports, it does not offer sophisticated analytical capabilities or custom report generation. Its simplicity is both a strength and a limitation, depending on your needs.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
As an open-source project, support for Docker DMARC Reports primarily comes from the community via GitHub issues. There is no dedicated support team. Users encountering issues or seeking enhancements would rely on documentation, community forums, or submitting pull requests themselves.
We have seen that the project maintainers are responsive to critical bugs and contributions, but it is not a commercial support model. Expertise in Docker and the underlying DMARC tools is beneficial for troubleshooting.
Similar to Docker DMARC Reports, support for Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is community-driven. Issues can be raised on its GitHub repository, and documentation is typically available within the project. It requires a DIY approach to problem-solving.
We found that the project, while functional, relies on user contributions and community efforts for ongoing maintenance and feature development. There is no official support channel, so a good understanding of PHP and MySQL is helpful for self-support.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
This tool is best suited for technically proficient individuals, small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs), or enterprises with existing Docker infrastructure and internal IT teams capable of self-hosting. Managed Service Providers (MSPs) who want to offer DMARC reporting as part of a self-managed stack would also find it suitable.
It is a strong choice for those who prioritize control over their data and infrastructure, and are comfortable with the hands-on nature of open-source software. For organizations without dedicated IT resources or Docker experience, the setup and maintenance could prove challenging.
Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer is ideal for developers, technically adept SMBs, and enterprises already operating LAMP or LEMP stacks. MSPs who prefer a traditional web application deployment model for their services would find it a viable option.
This viewer caters to users who need a straightforward DMARC reporting solution without the complexities of commercial platforms. It requires technical know-how for installation and ongoing management, making it less suitable for non-technical users or organizations seeking a fully managed service.

How does Docker DMARC Reports compare with Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Both Docker DMARC Reports and Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, while free and open source, come with inherent drawbacks. Docker DMARC Reports requires a strong understanding of Docker and container orchestration, adding a layer of complexity to deployment and maintenance. Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer, being a PHP-based application, necessitates a full web server stack setup, which can be resource-intensive and require ongoing security patching and maintenance. Neither provides advanced features like real-time alerts, comprehensive source identification beyond DMARC, or managed DMARC enforcement.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

Both Docker DMARC Reports and Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer are open-source and free to download and use, but require users to cover their own hosting and maintenance costs.
Logo
Logo
Small
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Medium
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Large
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Docker DMARC Reports or Techsneeze DMARCts report viewer?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions