Suped

Docker DMARC Reports vs ELK DMARC

Choose Docker DMARC Reports for a simpler Docker setup, choose ELK DMARC for deep ELK stack integration.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Docker DMARC Reports provides a focused approach to DMARC data. It parses aggregate DMARC reports and presents them in a web interface, allowing us to see overall compliance, sending sources, and DMARC enforcement trends. The core functionality is robust for basic reporting needs.
The strength of this tool lies in its simplicity. It's designed to be a lightweight containerized solution, which means it handles the essentials of DMARC report parsing and visualization without venturing into a broader email deliverability suite. It's a straightforward tool for direct DMARC compliance monitoring.
ELK DMARC, as its name suggests, leverages the full power of the ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) for DMARC reporting. This gives us immense flexibility in data ingestion, storage, and especially visualization. We can build highly customized dashboards to slice and dice DMARC data in virtually any way imaginable.
Beyond basic reporting, ELK DMARC's integration with Elasticsearch means we can perform deep dives into logs, correlate DMARC data with other email-related metrics, and set up advanced alerts based on complex queries. It's a powerhouse for those who need granular control and analytical depth, though it requires a good understanding of the ELK ecosystem.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
From a user experience perspective, Docker DMARC Reports offers a more traditional web interface. It's functional and presents the data clearly, making it relatively easy to navigate for anyone familiar with basic web applications. Setting it up involves configuring Docker, an IMAP mailbox, and a database, which requires some command-line proficiency but is well-documented.
Once running, checking DMARC reports is intuitive, with predefined views for domains, sources, and policies. It's less about customization and more about quick access to essential DMARC compliance data. For those who prefer a 'set it and forget it' solution with a clean display, it hits the mark, provided you are comfortable with self-hosting a Docker container.
ELK DMARC's user experience is largely defined by Kibana. While incredibly powerful, Kibana can have a steeper learning curve for users unfamiliar with it. Building custom dashboards and queries requires a solid understanding of Elasticsearch query language and Kibana's interface, which can be daunting for novices.
However, for experienced ELK stack users, the experience is highly rewarding. The ability to tailor every visualization, combine different data sources, and drill down into specific data points offers unparalleled flexibility. It trades ease of initial setup and casual browsing for deep, customizable analytical power.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Being an open-source project hosted on GitHub, Docker DMARC Reports relies on community support. This means that formal support channels are limited, and we'd typically look to the GitHub issues section for troubleshooting, bug reports, and feature requests. The responsiveness depends heavily on the project maintainers and other contributors.
While there's no dedicated support team, the project is relatively contained, making it easier for technically savvy users to understand and debug. We might find solutions through existing issues or by contributing ourselves, but it's not a solution for those who require immediate, guaranteed professional assistance.
Similar to Docker DMARC Reports, ELK DMARC is also an open-source project, meaning its primary support mechanism is community-driven through GitHub. However, because it's built on the widely adopted ELK stack, we benefit from a much larger ecosystem of resources. There are extensive documentation, forums, and communities dedicated to Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana.
While direct support for the ELK DMARC wrapper might be niche, general ELK stack issues often have solutions readily available. This makes it a more viable option for teams with existing ELK expertise or those willing to invest in learning the stack, as they can tap into a broader knowledge base to resolve underlying infrastructure challenges.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Docker DMARC Reports is highly suitable for individual IT professionals, small to medium businesses (SMBs), and developers who need a straightforward DMARC reporting solution. It's ideal for those with a good grasp of Docker and a desire for a self-hosted, no-cost (software-wise) tool to monitor their DMARC compliance. It's less ideal for large enterprises or MSPs requiring advanced features or multi-tenancy.
For MSPs or enterprise environments, the lack of built-in multi-tenancy and advanced features means deploying and managing separate instances for each client or domain would become cumbersome. However, for a single domain or a handful of domains managed by a technically proficient team, it's a solid, minimalist choice.
ELK DMARC is best suited for organizations, including larger SMBs and enterprises, that already use or are committed to leveraging the ELK stack for their data analytics. It's perfect for IT teams, security analysts, or data engineers who need highly customizable DMARC dashboards and want to integrate DMARC data into their broader observability platforms. It requires significant technical expertise in the ELK stack.
While not inherently multi-tenant, an MSP could theoretically deploy separate ELK stacks for clients, but this would be a heavy lift. For an enterprise with an existing ELK infrastructure, integrating ELK DMARC can provide a powerful and flexible DMARC monitoring capability, offering deep insights beyond simple reporting.

How does Docker DMARC Reports compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

The primary drawback for both Docker DMARC Reports and ELK DMARC is the inherent complexity of self-hosting. While they offer cost-free software, the operational overhead, maintenance, and the need for significant technical expertise can be substantial. Docker DMARC Reports is simpler to deploy but offers less flexibility, while ELK DMARC provides incredible power at the cost of a steep learning curve and higher resource demands for the underlying ELK stack.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

Both solutions are open-source and therefore free in terms of software cost, but they differ significantly in the underlying infrastructure resources and technical expertise required for deployment and ongoing maintenance.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Free (requires self-hosting infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Free (requires self-hosting ELK stack infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Medium
Free (requires self-hosting infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Free (requires self-hosting ELK stack infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Large
Free (requires self-hosting infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Free (requires self-hosting ELK stack infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Enterprise
Free (requires self-hosting infrastructure and maintenance costs)
Free (requires self-hosting ELK stack infrastructure and maintenance costs)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with Docker DMARC Reports or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions