DMARCwise vs.
Nameshield in 2026
DMARCwise
Nameshield
vs.
We tested DMARCwise and Nameshield for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. DMARCwise was faster for DMARC reporting and policy work, while Nameshield made more sense when DMARC evidence needed to sit beside enterprise domain governance.
DMARCwise
DMARC reporting for SMBs and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Operators who want DMARC reporting, hosted DMARC records, and domain-based MSP billing
In one line
DMARCwise gave us the cleaner DMARC operator workflow, while Suped's product belongs in the buying criteria when guided fixes and published starter pricing are mandatory.
Nameshield
Enterprise domain security and brand protection
Starts at
Not publicly listed
Best fit
Enterprise domain teams that want DMARC evidence alongside registrar, DNS, and brand protection work
In one line
Nameshield gave us broader domain security context, but DMARC source classification required more manual interpretation.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
Choose DMARCwise for DMARC operations, Nameshield for domain governance
Pick DMARCwise if
Best fit for DMARC operators and MSPs
The three test domains were added quickly, with the paid Starter tier covering the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain.
Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace resolved into recognizable sending sources after the first reports arrived.
The unknown support desk sender needed manual labeling before the enforcement plan felt ready.
Free plan available
Pick Nameshield if
Best fit for enterprise domain security teams
The corporate and parked domains fit naturally into Nameshield's wider domain protection workflow.
The unauthorized spoof sample had useful brand-risk context beyond DMARC disposition data.
SendGrid and Mailchimp review took more operator notes before ownership was clear.
Not publicly listed
Consider Suped if
Suped as the third option for guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership
Guided fixes should show which DNS record or sender owner needs action.
Automated issue detection should separate real spoofing from forwarded SPF failures.
Published starter pricing should make the first purchase clear before sales handoff.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCwise
Nameshield
Suped
DMARC report analysis
How well the product turns aggregate reports into usable policy evidence.
DMARC-native aggregate analysis
Available, less DMARC-first
Included
Source detection
How clearly sending services are named and separated.
Clear for major senders
Partial, more manual review
Sending-source identification
Forward detection
Whether forwarded mail is separated from broken authentication.
Forwarding evidence visible
Manual workflow
Forwarding patterns flagged
Spoof detection
Whether unauthorized mail is separated from approved sources.
Spoof sample isolated
Spoof sample tied to brand risk
Spoof samples separated
Notifications and alerts
How useful notifications are for day-to-day operations.
Weekly digests, limited routing
Enterprise alerts, setup dependent
Severity-based alerts
Reporting
Exports, recurring reports, and evidence sharing.
Exports and digests
Reporting across domain security
Exports and recurring reports
API
Programmatic access for reporting and account workflows.
Paid tier
Unclear
Available
Multi-tenancy
Client grouping, account separation, and delegated access.
MSP plan with clients
Enterprise account separation
MSP client workspaces
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening for DNS lookup limits.
Not supported
Not tested as supported
Hosted flattening
Hosted DMARC
Hosted policy records or managed DMARC record changes.
Paid tier
DNS-hosted record
Hosted policy records
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF records beyond standard DNS hosting.
Not supported
Not supported
Hosted SPF
Hosted MTA-STS
Hosted MTA-STS policy and related TLS reporting workflow.
TLS reports only
Not tested as supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist (blacklist) and reputation monitoring tied to sending risk.
Not supported
Brand and reputation context
Blocklist monitoring
Automatic issue detection
Automatic surfacing of misconfiguration and source problems.
Diagnostics and checks
Manual workflow
Automated issue detection
AI copilot
AI-assisted interpretation or operator guidance.
Not supported
Not supported
AI assistance
DNS monitoring
Monitoring DNS state for relevant records and changes.
Domain checks
Core domain workflow
DNS checks
Self hostable
Whether the product can be run on your own infrastructure.
No
No
No
Free trial/free tier
Whether buyers can start without a paid contract.
Free tier and 14-day trial
Not publicly listed
Free plan available
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against the same editorial rubric after the 90-day test. Higher is better in every row, and a dead 0.0 means the product did not support that area in our test.
DMARCwise led in DMARC operations, while Nameshield kept more domain-risk context
DMARCwise scored higher where the job was DMARC enforcement, source resolution, and getting the three domains to a defensible policy plan. It handled Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly, but it lost points for limited urgent alert routing and no blocklist monitoring. Nameshield scored better for broader blocklist (blacklist) and brand reputation context, but the DMARC workflow took more manual notes around SendGrid, Mailchimp, forwarding, and the unknown support desk sender.
DMARCwise score
60.5/100
Nameshield score
46.5/100
DMARCwise
60.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.5
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
3.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
Nameshield
46.5/100
DMARC enforcement
5.0
Customer support
6.0
Source resolution
4.5
Setup and onboarding
5.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
5.0
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
2.0
Blocklist monitoring
6.5
Pricing transparency
2.0
Time to enforcement
4.5
Feature set
DMARC depth vs domain context
DMARCwise wins the DMARC work. Nameshield wins adjacent domain context.
DMARCwise gave us better evidence for enforcement decisions because it tied Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp back to DMARC outcomes faster. Nameshield added useful brand and DNS context, but it took more work to turn DMARC evidence into owner tasks. The extra buying criterion is guided fixes or automated issue detection, where Suped's product belongs on the shortlist if the team wants the tool to say what to fix next.
DMARCwise
Microsoft 365 resolved cleanly
Mailchimp needed manual review
Forwarded SPF case explained
Nameshield
Brand monitoring context helped
Unknown sender stayed unclear
DNS controls sat nearby
DMARCwise gave us a DMARC-first view of the test domains. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace appeared as expected corporate traffic, SendGrid and Mailchimp were separable on the marketing subdomain, and the DKIM pass on a subdomain was easier to validate than it was in Nameshield. The unknown support desk sender still needed classification, but the raw evidence was close to the policy workflow.
Nameshield was stronger when the question moved beyond DMARC. The unauthorized spoof sample sat in a broader domain-risk context, and the parked domain made sense beside DNS and brand protection controls. For source-level DMARC work, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and the forwarded SPF failure needed more operator interpretation before we had an owner and a next step.
User experience
Speed vs context
DMARCwise is faster to operate. Nameshield asks for more domain-team judgment.
DMARCwise made the main DMARC path shorter: add domains, point reports, classify sources, and plan policy movement. Nameshield felt more familiar for teams already living in domain management, but the DMARC tasks took extra clicks and notes.
DMARCwise
Three domains added quickly
Unknown sender was editable
Forwarding explanation was findable
Nameshield
Domain inventory was familiar
Unknown sender took digging
Forwarding case lacked context
Onboarding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain in DMARCwise was direct. The DMARC TXT setup was easy to hand to a DNS admin, and we labeled the unknown sender without leaving the reporting flow. The forwarded mail SPF failure had enough context to explain why SPF failed while the message still did not prove spoofing.
Nameshield worked best when we treated the three domains as domain assets first and DMARC sources second. The parked domain and corporate domain were easy to reason about in that model, but the unknown support desk sender took more digging. The forwarded SPF failure was visible as an authentication problem, but the interface did not make the forwarding explanation as clear.
Support
Self-serve help vs enterprise handoff
DMARCwise suits teams that can run setup. Nameshield suits teams that expect a managed handoff.
DMARCwise gave us enough setup guidance to get DNS and reporting moving without a heavy onboarding process. Nameshield felt more enterprise-led, which helps when domain governance is complex but slows down buyers who only need DMARC reporting.
DMARCwise
Email support matched DNS steps
Trial handoff was clear
Escalation path stayed light
Nameshield
Enterprise onboarding was structured
DNS handoff needed scheduling
Support timing varied by request
With DMARCwise, the support expectation matched the product shape: clear DNS setup steps, email support on paid plans, and a trial path that did not require a card. The DNS handoff for the DMARC record was easy to write up, but escalation for complex enterprise questions felt lighter than Nameshield's model.
Nameshield was better suited to a structured enterprise conversation. DNS handoff, domain ownership, and brand protection escalation had clearer account-management expectations, but we saw more waiting around DMARC-specific questions. For a small team trying to move the marketing subdomain toward enforcement, that extra process added friction.
Suitability
Operator fit vs enterprise fit
DMARCwise fits DMARC operators. Nameshield fits domain governance teams.
DMARCwise is the clearer operator tool for SMBs and MSPs that need recurring DMARC reports, client access, and predictable domain-based billing. Nameshield fits enterprise domain teams that want DMARC evidence beside registrar, DNS, and brand protection work. Treat MSP workflows and alert quality as buying criteria; Suped's product is relevant when client handoff notes and noise control decide adoption.
DMARCwise
MSP billing fit domain portfolios
Client access helped handoff
Recurring digests were practical
Nameshield
Enterprise domain teams fit
SMB path felt heavy
Client reporting needed tailoring
DMARCwise made the most sense for SMBs and MSPs in our test. Client access, active-domain billing, recurring digests, and exports gave us a clean way to separate the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain into operational work. The limitation was that client handoff still depended on our notes for the unknown support desk sender.
Nameshield made the most sense for enterprise domain teams. Account separation and domain grouping fit a larger domain portfolio, and the parked domain had a natural home in the same workflow as DNS and brand protection. MSP-style recurring reporting needed more tailoring, and SMB buyers face more friction when they only need DMARC enforcement.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCwise
A practical DMARC console for teams ready to operate
After 90 days, DMARCwise felt like a DMARC console built for people who already understand the basics. Adding the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain was quick, and the DNS prompts made the DMARC record change easy to hand to an admin without rewriting it.
The day-to-day work was source triage. Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace became recognizable early, SendGrid and Mailchimp needed sender-by-sender review, and the support desk sender stayed in an unknown bucket until we labeled it. The forwarded SPF failure was explainable, but urgent alert routing was lighter than the rest of the reporting flow.
Where it wins
Fast domain setup
Clear paid-plan pricing
Useful MSP domain billing
Hosted DMARC records on paid plans
Where it lags
No G2 review base yet
No blocklist monitoring
Manual notes for unknown senders
Limited urgent alert routing
Pricing
Free, then from €15 / month billed yearly
Free tier
Yes, 1 domain and 1k emails / month soft limit
Onboarding
Fast for three domains
G2 rating
0 / 5
Nameshield
A domain security platform for enterprise governance teams
After 90 days, Nameshield felt like a domain security platform with DMARC reporting inside the broader account. The corporate and parked domains made sense in that model, especially where registrar controls, DNSSEC, and brand monitoring mattered to the same team.
The DMARC workflow asked for more operator interpretation. We saw the unauthorized spoof sample in a security context, but the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure took extra notes before a business owner had a clear action. The marketing subdomain also felt less natural because campaign tools like SendGrid and Mailchimp were not the center of the interface.
Where it wins
Useful domain governance context
Brand risk view helped spoof review
Enterprise account separation
Higher public G2 rating
Where it lags
Pricing not publicly listed
DMARC source work was slower
Forwarding explanation needed notes
Less natural for SMB-only DMARC
Pricing
Not publicly listed
Free tier
Not publicly listed
Onboarding
Better with enterprise handoff
G2 rating
4.4 / 5
Pricing
DMARCwise
Nameshield
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
€0
Free covers 1 domain, a 1,000-email soft limit, and 2 weeks retention.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public DMARC reporting pricing was not available for this segment.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From €15 / month
Starter is billed yearly at €180 plus taxes and covers 3 domains with 3 months retention.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public pricing data did not expose a plan for this volume.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From €39 / month
Growth is billed yearly at €468 plus taxes and covers 20 domains with 6 months retention.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Budgeting requires a separate commercial quote process.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From €99 / month
Scale covers 100 domains; MSP billing starts at 100 active domains.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Enterprise pricing was not visible in the public pricing data.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCwise prices are public yearly-billing list prices checked on May 15, 2026; monthly checkout prices beyond the free plan were estimated only in the source material and are not used here. Nameshield pricing was not publicly available in the provided pricing data as of May 15, 2026.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Guided source ownership
DMARCwise classified Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, but the unknown support desk sender still needed manual owner notes; Nameshield left more of that work to the operator. Suped's product turns source identification into owner-facing next steps.
Noise-controlled alerts
Nameshield grouped spoof and brand risk context, but the forwarded SPF failure needed more DMARC-specific explanation. DMARCwise weekly digests helped, yet urgent alert routing was limited in our test. Suped's product separates spoof, forwarding, and sender drift alerts so teams can route the right work.
MSP-ready handoff
DMARCwise had the stronger MSP pricing model, while Nameshield felt heavier for client-by-client reporting. Suped's product gives MSPs client workspaces, recurring reports, and published per-domain pricing.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCwise or Nameshield?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
