DMARCwise vs.
MyDMARC in 2026
DMARCwise
MyDMARC
vs.
We tested DMARCwise and MyDMARC for 90 days across a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. DMARCwise gave us more control over policy movement, hosted DMARC, TLS reporting, and MSP separation, while MyDMARC was quicker for small-domain monitoring but thinner once we needed ownership notes, forwarding explanation, and enterprise handoff.
DMARCwise
DMARC reporting for SMBs and MSPs
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Teams managing multiple domains or client accounts
In one line
DMARCwise handled our three-domain test with clear DNS setup, hosted DMARC on paid plans, useful exports, and better separation for client-style work.
MyDMARC
Simple DMARC monitoring for smaller teams
Starts at
Free plan available
Best fit
Small teams watching a few domains
In one line
MyDMARC was fast to start, easy to read, and practical for basic monitoring, but it needed more manual interpretation around sender ownership and edge cases.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn about Suped
The short answer for buyers
Pick DMARCwise if
Choose DMARCwise if you manage several domains or client accounts
It grouped our corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain cleanly without mixing parked-domain spoof noise into the active sender view.
It separated Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp clearly enough for weekly operational review.
It gave us a stronger MSP route through client access, centralized digest handling, and active-domain billing.
Free plan available
Pick MyDMARC if
Choose MyDMARC if you want simple DMARC monitoring for a small domain set
It took less time to add our first domain and showed daily aggregate results with little setup friction.
It made the unauthorized spoof sample easy to notice once reports arrived.
It worked best when the sender list was already known and did not need detailed owner assignment.
Free plan available
Consider Suped if
Use Suped as the third option when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes matter when a team needs next steps for visible from mismatch, subdomain DKIM, and forwarded SPF failure, not just report rows.
Automated issue detection and higher-signal alerts reduce manual review when unknown senders appear during policy movement.
Published starter pricing helps teams compare a free plan, a 100k email paid tier, and MSP billing before procurement.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCwise
MyDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
Aggregate report parsing, sender views, and authentication breakdowns.
Supported with clearer drilldowns on paid plans
Supported with simpler monitoring views
Supported
Source detection
Ability to identify Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and unknown services.
Partial, good service labels and exports
Partial, more manual classification
Supported
Forward detection
Explains SPF failures caused by forwarding instead of treating every failure as abuse.
Supported with useful report context
Supported but required more manual explanation
Supported
Spoof detection
Flags unauthorized use of the visible from domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts, digests, routing, and noise control.
Weekly digests, limited routing
Basic alerts and priority email on Pro
Supported
Reporting
Exports, recurring review, and shareable reporting workflows.
Supported with import/export
Supported for basic reporting
Supported
API
Programmatic access for reporting or account workflows.
Paid tier
Not publicly listed
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Client separation, grouping, and delegated account workflows.
Supported on MSP plan
Not publicly listed
Supported
SPF flattening
Managed SPF flattening to avoid DNS lookup limits.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record hosting instead of manual DNS edits for every policy change.
Paid tier
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting and operational SPF changes.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS policy hosting and TLS reporting workflow.
TLS reporting only; hosted MTA-STS not listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring for domain or IP reputation issues.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Automatically finds authentication problems and suggests next actions.
Partial diagnostics
Partial alerting
Supported
AI copilot
Assistant-style guidance for investigation and remediation.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Supported
DNS monitoring
Ongoing checks for record drift and configuration changes.
Supported through domain checks
Partial, basic monitoring
Supported
Self hostable
Can run in your own infrastructure.
Not publicly listed
Not publicly listed
Not supported
Free trial/free tier
A public free option or trial for evaluation.
Free tier and 14-day trial
Free tier
Supported
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
We scored both products against a fixed editorial rubric across the same 90-day setup, sender mix, authentication cases, policy steps, and support handoff checks. Higher is better in every row.
DMARCwise scores higher on operations and enforcement, while MyDMARC scores best on simple monitoring
DMARCwise earned higher scores where the work moved past viewing aggregate reports: hosted DMARC, API access, client separation, exports, and a clearer route to quarantine planning. MyDMARC scored well on basic setup and report parsing, but lost ground when we needed owner assignment for the unknown sender, a cleaner forwarded-mail explanation, and published detail on larger plans. Both products scored 0.0 on blocklist monitoring because neither published or surfaced blocklist or blacklist monitoring in our test.
DMARCwise score
65/100
MyDMARC score
44/100
DMARCwise
65/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
7.0
Source resolution
7.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
4.5
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
8.0
Time to enforcement
8.0
MyDMARC
44/100
DMARC enforcement
6.0
Customer support
5.5
Source resolution
5.5
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
2.0
Alerting and integrations
4.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
0.0
Blocklist monitoring
0.0
Pricing transparency
6.5
Time to enforcement
6.0
Feature set
Depth vs simplicity
DMARCwise has the deeper feature set. MyDMARC keeps the core workflow lighter.
DMARCwise covered more of the operational work after reports arrived, especially hosted DMARC, TLS reporting, API access, exports, and MSP account separation. MyDMARC covered the essential DMARC reporting loop with less friction, but teams should treat guided fixes and automated issue detection as buying criteria when ownership is unclear or failures need remediation.
DMARCwise
Microsoft 365 classified cleanly
SendGrid separated from Mailchimp
Mismatch case explained better
MyDMARC
Simple sender report views
Spoof sample stood out
Unknown sender stayed manual
DMARCwise identified Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace cleanly on the corporate domain, kept SendGrid and Mailchimp separate on the marketing subdomain, and made the unknown sender easier to triage through source views and exports. In the visible from mismatch case, we could see why SPF passed at the infrastructure layer but still failed DMARC because the visible from domain did not match, which made the fix easier to assign.
MyDMARC showed Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp in a simpler report view, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to spot once the aggregate data arrived. The unknown sender needed more manual labeling, and the DKIM pass on a subdomain took more explanation because the product emphasized pass or fail status over owner next steps.
User experience
Control vs speed
MyDMARC starts faster. DMARCwise ages better once the workflow gets messy.
MyDMARC gave us the quickest first-domain setup and the least clutter for a small monitoring job. DMARCwise took a little more attention at the start, but the extra structure helped when the parked domain, forwarded mail SPF failure, and unknown sender all needed different follow-up paths.
DMARCwise
Three domains stayed separated
Unknown sender was traceable
Forwarding case had context
MyDMARC
Fast first-domain setup
Reports were easy to scan
Forwarding needed manual notes
DMARCwise took us through each of the three test domains with enough DNS context to avoid mixing the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain. Finding the unknown sender took a few clicks, but the surrounding source data, export flow, and authentication drilldowns made it easier to turn the finding into a task for the right owner.
MyDMARC had the simpler onboarding path for the first domain and was easy to read during the first week of aggregate reports. The unknown sender was visible but less guided, and the forwarded mail SPF failure needed a manual explanation because the interface did not clearly separate expected forwarding breakage from a sender that needed DNS work.
Support
Guidance vs self serve
DMARCwise gives clearer paid-plan support expectations. MyDMARC is more self serve until Pro.
DMARCwise publishes email support and guidance on paid plans, with best-effort support on Free, so the handoff path was clearer during DNS setup. MyDMARC publishes priority email support on Pro, but its public pricing leaves more unanswered questions about enterprise onboarding, escalation, and larger account needs.
DMARCwise
Paid email guidance listed
DNS handoff was clearer
MSP escalation fit better
MyDMARC
Self serve setup worked
Priority support on Pro
Enterprise path less clear
For DMARCwise, the setup path made it clear which DNS changes belonged to DMARC record hosting, which belonged to the sender, and which needed a domain owner. During our support handoff review, the paid-plan guidance fit SMB and MSP workflows better because we could attach exports, domain checks, and client notes to the escalation.
For MyDMARC, the product was easy enough that basic setup rarely needed help, especially on the single-domain path. When we modeled an enterprise handoff, the public support detail was thinner: Pro lists priority email support, but we did not find the same level of public detail for escalation paths, account onboarding, SSO, or dedicated DNS handoff.
Suitability
Operator fit
DMARCwise fits MSP and multi-domain operators better. MyDMARC fits smaller teams watching fewer domains.
DMARCwise is the better fit when account separation, client grouping, recurring reports, and delegated handoff matter every week. MyDMARC fits a smaller buyer that wants a clean DMARC monitor, but teams comparing tools should weigh MSP workflows and alert quality before they commit to a reporting-only workflow.
DMARCwise
Client access on MSP
Domain grouping held up
Recurring reports felt practical
MyDMARC
Best for SMB monitoring
Clear one-to-20-domain tiers
Client handoff was thin
DMARCwise fit our MSP-style scenario better because the corporate domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain could be reviewed without losing separation, and the MSP plan publicly lists unlimited clients, client access, centralized digest management, and active-domain billing. Recurring reporting felt practical because exports and digest controls gave us a repeatable handoff path.
MyDMARC fit the SMB scenario better than the MSP or enterprise scenario. The Free, Basic, and Pro tiers made sense for one to 20 monitored domains, but the test exposed gaps around client handoff, large account separation, recurring report packaging, and enterprise details above the published Pro plan.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCwise
Better for teams that turn DMARC reports into operating tasks
After 90 days, DMARCwise felt most useful during the middle of the project, when the easy sender approvals were done and the remaining work was classification, ownership, and policy movement. The corporate domain showed Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace clearly, while the marketing subdomain kept SendGrid and Mailchimp distinct enough for separate owner notes.
The parked domain also stayed clean. The unauthorized spoof sample stood out because there were no approved senders competing for attention, and hosted DMARC on paid plans made the policy path feel more controlled. The product still needed manual judgment for forwarding and some sender naming, but the workflow gave us enough structure to prepare a quarantine plan.
Where it wins
Good three-domain separation
Useful sender exports
Paid hosted DMARC
Strong MSP billing model
Where it lags
No public blocklist monitoring
Alert routing felt limited
Free retention is short
SPF hosting not listed
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 1k emails
Onboarding
Structured
G2 rating
0 / 5
MyDMARC
Better for small teams that need quick DMARC visibility
After 90 days, MyDMARC felt best when the job was to keep an eye on a small set of known senders. The first domain was quick to configure, daily parsing on the Free plan was enough for basic visibility, and the unauthorized spoof sample was easy to distinguish from approved Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic.
The limits showed up when the work became operational. The unknown sender needed manual classification, the forwarded mail SPF failure needed a separate explanation for stakeholders, and the public plan detail did not give us enough confidence for a larger enterprise or MSP handoff. For a small domain set, it stayed readable and low-friction.
Where it wins
Fast first setup
Readable monitoring views
Low public entry price
Clear domain-count tiers
Where it lags
Manual sender ownership
Short Free retention
No public API detail
Weak MSP fit
Pricing
Free plan available
Free tier
1 domain, 7 days
Onboarding
Fast
G2 rating
0 / 5
Pricing
DMARCwise
MyDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
€0
Free covers one domain, a soft 1k email limit, and two weeks of retention.
$0
Free covers one monitored domain, seven days of retention, and daily parsing.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
From €15 / month
Starter covers three domains when billed yearly and includes unlimited paid-plan report volume.
$19 / month
Basic covers five monitored domains, 30 days of retention, and hourly parsing.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
From €39 / month
Growth covers 20 domains when billed yearly and includes six months of retention.
$49 / month
Pro covers 20 monitored domains, 90 days of retention, near real-time parsing, and priority email support.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
From €99 / month
Scale covers 100 domains when billed yearly, while MSP pricing starts at 100 active domains.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Public pricing did not show plans above 20 monitored domains or enterprise terms.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCwise yearly prices are public list prices checked as of May 15, 2026; undiscounted monthly checkout prices were not visible. MyDMARC monthly prices are public list prices from its official pricing page, checked as of May 15, 2026; enterprise pricing and pricing above 20 monitored domains were not publicly listed. Any fit by email volume is an estimate where the vendor prices by domains rather than published monthly message volume.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Clearer sender ownership
MyDMARC left our unknown sender classification too manual, and DMARCwise still needed judgment on some source labels. Suped ties sending sources to owner-ready next steps so the team can assign fixes without rebuilding the investigation.
Higher-signal alerts
DMARCwise had useful digests but limited routing depth, while MyDMARC worked better as a monitoring view than an operations queue. Suped focuses alerts on material authentication changes, spoof attempts, and sender drift.
Hosted fixes in one workflow
DMARCwise has hosted DMARC on paid plans, but neither reviewed product publicly covered the full hosted SPF and MTA-STS workflow we wanted. Suped brings hosted records and guided remediation into the same enforcement workflow.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCwise or MyDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
