Suped

DMARCwise vs ELK DMARC

Choose DMARCwise for a managed solution, ELK DMARC for self-hosting control.
ELK DMARC
Compare to Suped
Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCwise provides a comprehensive suite of DMARC reporting features as a managed service. It offers DMARC aggregate reporting, which is essential for visibility into your email ecosystem. We found the platform's ability to host your DMARC record and validate it automatically to be particularly convenient, ensuring your DNS records are correctly configured.
Beyond core DMARC reporting, DMARCwise includes SMTP TLS reporting, allowing us to monitor the encryption of our outgoing emails. It promises unlimited report volume and unlimited DMARC record history, ensuring we never miss a beat. The inclusion of weekly email digests, domain checks, and easy import/export functions makes managing multiple domains straightforward.
ELK DMARC is an open-source, self-hosted solution leveraging the powerful ELK stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana). Its primary functionality revolves around collecting, parsing, and visualizing DMARC aggregate reports. As a self-hosted tool, it offers unparalleled flexibility and control over your data, which can be a significant advantage for organizations with specific compliance or data sovereignty requirements.
The strength of ELK DMARC lies in its foundational ELK stack components. Elasticsearch handles data storage and indexing, Logstash processes the raw DMARC XML reports, and Kibana provides highly customizable dashboards for data visualization. While it requires significant technical expertise to set up and maintain, it allows us to tailor reporting and alerting to our exact needs without vendor limitations.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCwise offers a user-friendly experience typical of a SaaS platform. Setting up our first domain was guided and straightforward, requiring minimal technical intervention beyond DNS record configuration. The dashboard is intuitive, presenting DMARC aggregate data in an easily digestible format, complete with clear graphs and summaries.
Navigating through reports, identifying sending sources, and understanding DMARC compliance levels felt natural. For teams, the ability to add unlimited members on higher tiers streamlines collaboration, allowing everyone to access the same insights. It's designed to be accessible even for those who aren't deep DMARC experts.
ELK DMARC, being a self-hosted open-source solution, demands a considerably higher level of technical proficiency for setup and ongoing management. We found that deploying the ELK stack and configuring Logstash to parse DMARC reports requires expertise in Linux administration, Docker, and the ELK ecosystem itself. It is not an out-of-the-box solution.
Once configured, the user experience within Kibana is powerful but requires a learning curve. Creating custom dashboards and visualizations offers immense flexibility, but it's a manual process. While the results are highly detailed, the initial effort and continuous maintenance mean it is best suited for users comfortable with command lines and data analytics platforms.
Which product has the best support

Support

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCwise offers structured support channels, primarily through email. For paid plans, we received prompt and helpful responses, indicative of professional email support and guidance. This is crucial when navigating complex DMARC issues or platform-specific queries.
Their free plan provides 'best-effort support', which is a fair offering for a complimentary tier. The clear distinction in support levels ensures that paying customers receive dedicated assistance, which is what we expect from a managed service.
ELK DMARC, as an open-source project, relies on community support. Our experience involved seeking help through GitHub issues and forums related to the ELK stack components. This type of support can be effective for well-documented issues, but it lacks the dedicated, guaranteed response times of a commercial product.
There is no direct commercial support team for ELK DMARC itself. Troubleshooting often means delving into documentation for Elasticsearch, Logstash, or Kibana, and relying on the contributions of other users. While powerful, this model requires a high degree of self-sufficiency and problem-solving skills.
Who should use each product

Suitability

Logo
ELK DMARC
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCwise is highly suitable for Small to Medium Businesses (SMBs) and even larger enterprises looking for a hassle-free, managed DMARC reporting solution. Its ease of use and comprehensive feature set makes it ideal for organizations without dedicated email security teams or extensive technical resources.
Managed Service Providers (MSPs) will also find DMARCwise appealing due to its multi-domain management capabilities and a flexible pay-as-you-go plan, allowing them to easily onboard and manage DMARC for their clients. It’s a good choice for those who prefer to offload the complexity of DMARC monitoring.
ELK DMARC is best suited for technically advanced organizations, especially enterprises with strong IT departments, significant data privacy concerns, or specific compliance requirements that necessitate self-hosting their email security data. It's perfect for those who thrive on control and customization.
It is less suitable for SMBs or typical MSPs who might lack the in-house expertise or resources to deploy and maintain an ELK stack. However, for large organizations who wish to integrate DMARC reporting into their existing security information and event management (SIEM) systems or custom dashboards, ELK DMARC provides the foundational tools to do so.

How does DMARCwise compare with ELK DMARC?

Logo
ELK DMARC
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCwise, while feature-rich, is a closed-source managed service, meaning less control over data and customization compared to self-hosted alternatives. The lack of public reviews makes it challenging to gauge community sentiment or specific pain points. ELK DMARC, on the other hand, demands significant technical investment for setup and maintenance, and it lacks the dedicated support or user-friendly interface of a commercial product.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
ELK DMARC

Pricing

DMARCwise offers tiered pricing that scales with usage and features, while ELK DMARC is free to use but incurs infrastructure and operational costs.
Logo
ELK DMARC
Small
Free or 15 €/month (yearly)
Contact for pricing
Medium
39 €/month (yearly)
Contact for pricing
Large
99 €/month (yearly)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCwise or ELK DMARC?
Logo
ELK DMARC
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions