Suped

DMARCPal vs Send-Shield

Choose DMARCPal for basic DMARC needs, or Send-Shield for more comprehensive features and detailed reporting.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal initially presents a streamlined approach, particularly with its Lite plan, focusing on essential DMARC reporting. We found that this tier is quite bare-bones, offering just the raw email provider reports. Moving to the Standard plan, DMARCPal introduces a suite of tools designed to assist with DMARC implementation and debugging, which is a necessary step for organizations serious about enforcement.
The Premium plan then layers on more sophisticated tools, notably including email alerts for broken DNS records. This progression suggests DMARCPal caters to users who might start with basic needs and gradually require more hands-on debugging and monitoring capabilities as they mature their DMARC policy. However, we note that advanced features like SPF flattening or MTA-STS are not explicitly mentioned in their offerings.
Send-Shield starts strong with foundational DMARC monitoring, SPF, and DKIM checks across its plans. We observed that even their Starter plan provides a solid base for smaller businesses to begin their DMARC journey. The platform emphasizes active domain monitoring and a clear DMARC self-setup process, which is beneficial for those new to DMARC.
As we move up to the Core and Plus tiers, Send-Shield significantly expands its functionality, incorporating automatic subdomain detection, various levels of reports (basic, analytical, enterprise), and proactive threat monitoring. The inclusion of a dedicated account manager in higher tiers also signals a more comprehensive, managed service approach, particularly valuable for larger organizations dealing with complex email ecosystems.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Our experience with DMARCPal suggests it's designed with a 'tech-savvy' user in mind, especially at its entry levels. While the interface is clean, we found that understanding the raw email provider reports and using the debugging tools effectively requires a solid grasp of DMARC, SPF, and DKIM concepts. The platform provides the tools, but expects the user to know how to wield them.
This approach means that users who are experts in email protocols will likely appreciate the direct access to data and tools. However, for those less familiar with the intricacies of email authentication, there might be a steeper learning curve, requiring external knowledge or significant effort to translate the data into actionable insights.
Send-Shield aims for a more guided user experience, offering features like 'DMARC Self Setup' and 'Full DMARC Implementation' across its plans. We found the platform provides more hand-holding, which can be invaluable for businesses of all sizes, especially those without dedicated email security experts. The dashboards tend to be more interpretative, translating complex DMARC data into digestible reports.
While the interface is generally intuitive, navigating the range of reporting options and threat monitoring features in the higher tiers can still present a slight learning curve. Overall, Send-Shield appears to prioritize making DMARC accessible, abstracting some of the deeper technical details for easier management and decision-making.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Regarding support, DMARCPal's pricing structure doesn't explicitly detail various support levels. Given its 'Lite' plan targets tech-savvy users, we infer that the standard support is likely email-based or self-service focused. For advanced issues, the expectation seems to be that users leverage their own expertise or the provided debugging tools.
The 'Premium' plan does mention email alerts for broken DNS records, which acts as a form of proactive support, but direct human interaction for complex queries isn't highlighted. This suggests that businesses requiring extensive, hands-on support or dedicated assistance might need to explore other options or rely heavily on their in-house DMARC knowledge.
Send-Shield clearly differentiates its support offerings across its plans, starting with 'Basic Email Support' for Starter users. This tiered approach allows businesses to choose a plan that aligns with their need for assistance. We appreciate the transparency in their support model, which progresses to 'Email and Meeting Support' for Core and Plus customers.
For enterprises, Send-Shield offers 'Premium 24/7 Support' and a 'Dedicated Account Manager,' which is a significant advantage for large organizations with critical email infrastructure or those who prefer a more personalized service. This robust support structure indicates a commitment to assisting users through their DMARC journey, regardless of their technical proficiency.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal is particularly suitable for small to medium businesses (SMBs) or individual IT professionals who possess a strong understanding of email authentication protocols. Its Lite and Standard plans provide essential tools without unnecessary frills, making it cost-effective for those who know exactly what they need and how to use it. For MSPs (managed service providers), DMARCPal could serve smaller clients if the MSP's team has the DMARC expertise to manage multiple instances efficiently.
However, for larger enterprises with complex email environments or those requiring extensive hands-on management and dedicated support, DMARCPal might fall short. The emphasis on self-service and the lack of explicit enterprise-grade features like multi-tenancy or advanced threat intelligence suggest it's less tailored for large-scale, intricate deployments.
Send-Shield presents a more scalable solution, making it well-suited for a broader range of organizations from SMBs to large enterprises. The tiered plans with increasing message caps and domain monitoring capabilities, along with features like automatic subdomain detection and advanced threat intelligence, cater effectively to growing businesses. For MSPs, the 'Monitoring up to X Active Domains' and the inclusion of a 'Dedicated Account Manager' in higher tiers make it a strong contender for managing multiple client domains efficiently and with a higher level of service.
The platform's robust reporting and proactive threat monitoring also make it a strong choice for enterprises that need comprehensive visibility and protection across their extensive email infrastructure. While SMBs can certainly benefit from the Starter and Core plans, the advanced features and support options make Send-Shield a more attractive proposition for larger, more complex organizational needs.

How does DMARCPal compare with Send-Shield?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCPal, while offering a clear progression of features, can feel a bit sparse at the lower tiers, requiring a significant level of technical expertise to fully leverage its capabilities. The lack of explicit advanced features like SPF flattening or BIMI support might be a drawback for organizations pushing the boundaries of email authentication. Send-Shield, on the other hand, provides a more comprehensive feature set but its pricing, especially for higher message volumes, can become a significant consideration for budget-conscious organizations. The basic email support in its entry-level plan might also leave some users wanting more immediate assistance.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCPal offers a 14-day free trial followed by Lite, Standard, and Premium plans, but requires contact for specific pricing details beyond the trial, whereas Send-Shield provides transparent annual pricing across its Starter, Core, Plus, and Enterprise tiers, based on email volume and domains.
Logo
Logo
Small
Lite (14-day free trial)
£19.99/month (10k emails)
Medium
Standard (Contact for pricing)
£49.99/month (100k emails)
Large
Premium (Contact for pricing)
£299.00/month (1M emails)
Enterprise
Contact for pricing
£699.00+/month (5M emails)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or Send-Shield?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions