Suped

DMARCPal vs DMARC360

Choose DMARCPal for focused DMARC reporting, choose DMARC360 for comprehensive brand protection.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal provides a solid foundation for DMARC reporting and analysis. Its core strength lies in aggregating and presenting DMARC data in an understandable format, allowing us to quickly identify DMARC compliance issues. The platform emphasizes ease of use for interpreting DMARC reports, which is beneficial for teams that need clear, actionable insights without extensive manual data crunching.
When we delve into DMARCPal's offerings, we find tools geared towards simplifying the DMARC journey. This includes features to help with SPF and DKIM debugging, indicating a focus on the foundational elements of email authentication. While it may not offer the expansive threat intelligence of some competitors, its DMARC-centric toolkit is robust for its intended purpose.
DMARC360, part of the CTM360 platform, offers a much broader feature set that extends beyond traditional DMARC reporting into comprehensive digital risk protection. It consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti-phishing, and takedowns. This integrated approach means we are not just looking at DMARC compliance, but also how our brand is being protected across the digital landscape.
Our experience with DMARC360 shows a platform that delivers highly actionable alerts and pre-populated threat data specific to our brand. This includes monitoring for breached credentials, fake applications, and brand impersonation. While DMARC is a key component, it's presented within a larger framework of cybersecurity, making it suitable for organizations with a holistic security strategy.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal's user interface is designed with clarity and simplicity in mind, making it accessible even for users who are relatively new to DMARC. We found the navigation straightforward, with reports that clearly highlight areas needing attention. The focus is on presenting DMARC data without overwhelming the user with unnecessary complexities.
The platform prioritizes a quick understanding of DMARC compliance and authentication issues. This approach is beneficial for teams that require a tool that gets straight to the point, enabling them to interpret results and take corrective actions efficiently. It’s built for practical DMARC management, ensuring a smooth user journey.
DMARC360, while powerful, presents a more comprehensive and feature-rich interface. This means there can be a steeper learning curve for first-time users, especially when navigating its various modules for external attack surface management, brand protection, and email security metrics. We’ve noticed that while the platform is user-friendly, it benefits from tailored onboarding.
Despite the initial complexity, DMARC360 provides a unified view of various external threats. Once familiar with the platform, we can appreciate the consolidated insights and the ability to manage diverse security aspects from a single dashboard. The responsiveness of its support team also helps in overcoming any interface challenges.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal offers support that aligns with its focused DMARC service. We found their documentation to be helpful for self-service, covering common DMARC issues and setup procedures. For direct assistance, the channels typically include email support, which is suitable for addressing specific reporting or configuration questions.
The support experience with DMARCPal is generally efficient for queries related to DMARC data interpretation and platform usage. It caters well to users who primarily need guidance on DMARC implementation and troubleshooting without requiring extensive hands-on management from the provider.
The support offered by DMARC360 (CTM360) is highly responsive and comprehensive, a common theme in user reviews. We have experienced a proactive and engaged support team that assists with various aspects, from platform navigation to complex incident response and takedown requests. This level of support is crucial given the platform's broad capabilities.
Users consistently highlight the professionalism and helpfulness of the CTM360 team. They are often praised for their quick action on takedown requests and their ability to guide users through filtering features and remediation processes. This indicates a strong commitment to customer success, particularly for organizations relying on managed digital risk protection services.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCPal is an excellent fit for small to medium businesses (SMBs) and tech-savvy individuals or IT teams that need a dedicated, straightforward DMARC reporting solution. Its focus on DMARC and email authentication makes it ideal for those primarily looking to improve email deliverability and combat spoofing without needing a broader cybersecurity suite. For managed service providers (MSPs), it could serve as a foundational DMARC tool, though it might lack advanced multi-tenancy features.
For enterprise-level organizations, DMARCPal might be too specialized if they require an integrated digital risk protection platform. However, for specific departments or smaller projects within an enterprise that are solely focused on DMARC compliance, it offers a reliable and easy-to-use option.
DMARC360 (CTM360) is particularly well-suited for enterprise organizations and managed service providers (MSPs) that require a comprehensive digital risk protection platform. Its integrated approach, encompassing DMARC, external attack surface management, brand protection, and takedowns, addresses a wider array of cybersecurity concerns. This makes it a strong contender for organizations that need a unified view of their external threat landscape.
While it offers a Community Edition, its full capabilities are geared towards larger businesses and enterprises with significant digital footprints and a higher risk of brand impersonation or phishing attacks. SMBs might find its extensive feature set more than they need, but for organizations needing robust, proactive threat monitoring and response, DMARC360 is a powerful solution.

How does DMARCPal compare with DMARC360?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCPal's primary drawback is its singular focus, which may not suffice for organizations seeking a broader cybersecurity posture beyond DMARC. Its pricing details are also not transparently available online, requiring direct contact to understand the costs fully. For DMARC360, the extensive feature set can lead to a notable learning curve for new users, and some reviews mention limited customization options for reports and occasional issues with filtering features or false positives. While powerful, its wide array of modules can initially be overwhelming.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo
No G2 reviews
G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.
delivers a seamless, proactive brand protection experience
What do you like best about CTM360? CTM360 consolidates external attack surface management, brand protection, anti‑phishing, and takedowns into a single, unified platform. It cuts through the noise with pre‑populated threat data specific to our brand—no extra setup required—and consistently delivers highly actionable alerts What do you dislike about CTM360? While takedowns are fast and effective, expanding reach across more platforms and registrars would enhance the impact What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Data leakage, Breaches, Brand imposters or VIP
Verified User in Airlines/Aviation
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
It's Good
What do you like best about CTM360? The detection works. Really good information given on breached credentials and fake apps that a takedown was so easy. What do you dislike about CTM360? The interface is not user friendly. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of clicks to get the information needed. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? It allows us to view breached credentials and also fake website & apps.
Zulfa J.
CTO Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
CTM360 give whole experience as a user. The detection for cases is okay overall
What do you like best about CTM360? The support of the CTM360 team is totally responsive and helpful. The platform also user friendly and easy to use What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometimes we got confuse with the filtering features. However, the support team has guide us accordingly What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? Detection for EASM cases - features of deep scanning brand monitoring. By connecting with the CIRT team globally. CTM360 Sometimes able to take down cases faster than other platform
Verified User in Financial Services
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Recommmended
What do you like best about CTM360? quick Threat intelligence and insights about the related issues and leaks What do you dislike about CTM360? Sometime shows repeated or resolved issues and vulnerabilities What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? TI feeds, Data leaks etc
Hafiz T.
Unit Head Cyber Security Operations Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Review CTM360 after using for 1 Year period.
What do you like best about CTM360? Most helpful from CTM360 is take down phishing domain very fast for my customer and could finding and detect Brand Impersonation focus on Social media app with fake content. What do you dislike about CTM360? Least helpful is data exposure on repository with another platform such as Gitlab , Bitbucket in case some customer using above tool will could not detect. What problems is CTM360 solving and how is that benefiting you? In the past take down period is big issue for my customer because take around 5-7days and customer have complain on this issue , However when changing to use "Brand Protection" of CTM360 service , CTM360 team could help my team action quickly on take down phishing URL or fake content URL related with my customer domain name. average complete action take down around 2-3 days.
Watthanachai K.
Consulting IT Specialist Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

Pricing

DMARCPal outlines tiered plans without explicit pricing, while DMARC360 offers a free Community Edition, with other plans requiring direct contact.
Logo
Logo
Small
Medium
Large
Enterprise

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCPal or DMARC360?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCPal vs DMARC360 DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped