DMARCly vs.
LetsDMARC in 2026
DMARCly
0.0/5
LetsDMARC
4.5/5
vs.
We tested DMARCly and LetsDMARC for 90 days across a primary corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain. DMARCly gave us faster price-to-feature clarity and tighter SPF operational controls, while LetsDMARC gave us broader enterprise workflows, stronger managed DNS coverage, and cleaner guidance for mixed Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, Mailchimp, and support desk traffic.
Ava Chen
System Administrator, Suped
Published 6 Nov 2025
Updated 5 Jun 2026
8 min read
Summarize with
DMARCly
DMARC reporting with clear public tiers
Starts at
$17.99 / month
Best fit
Small teams that want transparent pricing and practical SPF controls
In one line
DMARCly handled our three-domain test with straightforward report drilldowns, useful vendor identification, and clear limits by tier.
LetsDMARC
Enterprise DMARC and managed DNS
Starts at
From GBP 264 / year
Best fit
Enterprises and MSPs that need hosted DNS, tenant separation, and guided policy movement
In one line
LetsDMARC felt stronger when we needed account separation, managed DNS publishing, and policy guidance across several sending sources.
Suped
The third option. Hosted SPF, DMARC, and MTA-STS on every plan. Published pricing. Monthly plans. No long contract required.
Learn more
Pick by workflow, not by dashboard screenshots
Pick DMARCly if
Best for small teams that want predictable pricing and SPF controls
The Professional tier covered our corporate domain and marketing subdomain with enough room for 100,000 compliant messages.
Safe SPF on the Growth tier gave us a practical path for SendGrid and Mailchimp SPF lookup pressure.
Vendor identification separated Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp quickly, but the support desk sender still needed manual confirmation.
From $17.99 / month
Pick LetsDMARC if
Best for enterprise teams that need managed DNS and tenant separation
The three test domains were easier to group by use case, especially the parked domain and marketing subdomain.
Hosted DMARC and SPF workflows reduced the DNS handoff steps for quarantine planning.
The unknown sender workflow was cleaner for escalation, although final pricing still needed a quote.
From GBP 264 / year
Consider Suped if
Use Suped when guided fixes, hosted records, and simpler ownership matter
Guided fixes should show the owner, DNS change, and expected authentication result for each sending source.
Automated issue detection should flag SPF domain mismatches, DKIM drift, and new senders before policy movement stalls.
Published starter pricing helps teams budget without waiting for a quote, especially for small DMARC rollouts.
Free plan available
The differences that actually change your week
DMARCly
LetsDMARC
Suped
DMARC report analysis
RUA aggregation, source views, policy signals, and drilldowns.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Source detection
Ability to identify sending services and classify unknown traffic.
Manual workflow
Supported
Supported
Forward detection
Handling of SPF failures caused by forwarding paths.
Partial
Supported
Supported
Spoof detection
Visibility into unauthorized use of the visible From domain.
Supported
Supported
Supported
Notifications and alerts
Operational alerts for DNS changes, sender shifts, and failures.
Reports and alerts
Slack and Teams available
Supported
Reporting
Recurring exports and stakeholder-ready DMARC summaries.
Supported
Supported
Supported
API
Programmatic access for domain, alert, or report workflows.
Enterprise tier
Administrative API
Supported
Multi-tenancy
Account separation for clients, business units, or delegated teams.
Domain groups
MSP workflow
Supported
SPF flattening
Hosted or managed SPF flattening to reduce lookup failures.
Paid tier
Supported
Supported
Hosted DMARC
Managed DMARC record publishing and policy updates.
Reporting only
Supported
Supported
Hosted SPF
Managed SPF record hosting and update workflow.
Safe SPF
Supported
Supported
Hosted MTA-STS
Managed MTA-STS and TLS reporting workflow.
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT monitoring
Supported
Supported
Blocklists and reputation
Blocklist or blacklist monitoring and reputation signals.
Business tier
Domain Guardian
Supported
Automatic issue detection
Detection of authentication errors, new senders, and drift.
Partial
Supported
Supported
AI copilot
AI-assisted explanation or remediation guidance.
Not tested
Not tested
Supported
DNS monitoring
Monitoring for DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MX, and related DNS changes.
DNS timeline
Supported
Supported
Self hostable
Ability to run the product in your own environment.
No
On Premise option
No
Free trial/free tier
Public evaluation path before paying.
14 day free trial
30 day free trial
Free tier
Ten dimensions, scored from 0 to 10
Each product was scored against a fixed editorial rubric covering enforcement readiness, support, source resolution, onboarding, MSP workflows, alerting, hosted records, blocklist and blacklist monitoring, pricing clarity, and time to enforcement. Higher is better in every row.
LetsDMARC scored higher on enterprise operations, while DMARCly stayed stronger on pricing clarity
DMARCly was easier to budget and gave us practical SPF and report controls quickly, but policy movement still depended on more manual interpretation when the unknown sender and forwarded SPF failure appeared. LetsDMARC scored higher where managed DNS, tenant separation, hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, and escalation workflows mattered. The tradeoff was pricing clarity, since the official buying path still moved into quote-based packaging.
DMARCly score
66.5/100
LetsDMARC score
76/100
DMARCly
66.5/100
DMARC enforcement
7.0
Customer support
6.5
Source resolution
7.0
Setup and onboarding
7.5
MSP workflows
5.5
Alerting and integrations
5.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
4.5
Blocklist monitoring
7.0
Pricing transparency
9.0
Time to enforcement
7.0
LetsDMARC
76/100
DMARC enforcement
8.0
Customer support
8.0
Source resolution
8.0
Setup and onboarding
8.0
MSP workflows
8.0
Alerting and integrations
7.5
Hosted SPF and MTA-STS
8.5
Blocklist monitoring
7.5
Pricing transparency
4.5
Time to enforcement
8.0
Feature set
Breadth vs clarity
LetsDMARC has the broader enterprise set. DMARCly has clearer packaged limits.
LetsDMARC covered more of the surrounding operating work in our test, especially managed DNS, hosted SPF, tenant handling, and alert routing. DMARCly was easier to map to a paid tier, and it still covered the core DMARC reporting jobs well. Buyers should check whether guided fixes and automated issue detection show the exact sender owner, DNS change, and expected authentication result, not only the failing record.
DMARCly
0/5
Clear vendor identification
SendGrid SPF mismatch visible
Mailchimp DKIM details exposed
LetsDMARC
4.5/5
Hosted records reduce handoffs
Microsoft 365 grouped cleanly
Unknown sender escalation worked
DMARCly parsed aggregate and forensic reports cleanly for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, SendGrid, and Mailchimp. It identified the major vendors, surfaced the SPF pass with visible From mismatch, and separated the DKIM pass on our marketing subdomain, but the unknown support desk sender still needed manual classification before we were comfortable moving policy.
LetsDMARC gave us a broader feature set around managed DNS, hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, DNS monitoring, TLS reporting, and enterprise administration. It classified Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace quickly, made SendGrid and Mailchimp easier to explain to a DNS owner, and gave the forwarded mail SPF failure a clearer operational path than a raw pass or fail view.
User experience
Speed vs guidance
DMARCly is quicker to understand. LetsDMARC gives better guided operations.
DMARCly made the first hour straightforward because the setup flow, reports, and pricing limits were easy to connect. LetsDMARC took more orientation, but it gave us better structure once the three domains, five approved senders, and authentication edge cases were in place.
DMARCly
0/5
Fast three-domain onboarding
Unknown sender took clicks
Forwarded SPF needed explanation
LetsDMARC
4.5/5
Better sender review flow
Forwarding context clearer
More setup decisions
DMARCly onboarding was direct for the primary domain and marketing subdomain, and the parked domain showed almost no legitimate traffic after the record propagated. Finding the unknown sender took several report views and a manual owner note, and explaining the forwarded mail SPF failure required translating the raw authentication result for a non-email stakeholder.
LetsDMARC needed more setup decisions because the product handled managed DNS, tenant-style grouping, and policy movement in the same workspace. Once configured, the unknown sender was easier to route for review, and the forwarded mail SPF failure was easier to explain because the workflow separated authentication failure from an actual spoof sample.
Support
Self serve vs handoff
DMARCly suits self serve teams. LetsDMARC suits teams that need guided handoff.
DMARCly gave us enough self-serve material to complete setup and handle normal DNS steps without a long procurement motion. LetsDMARC felt more suitable when setup, DNS publishing, escalation, and enterprise onboarding need to involve multiple owners.
DMARCly
0/5
Self-serve setup worked
DNS notes mostly manual
Chat depends on tier
LetsDMARC
4.5/5
Handoff workflow felt stronger
Enterprise onboarding clearer
Quote path adds friction
DMARCly's support expectations matched its public tiers. Email support on the lower tier and live chat on higher tiers made sense for our test, but DNS handoff notes were mostly something we had to write ourselves when the support desk sender needed confirmation and the marketing subdomain moved toward quarantine.
LetsDMARC felt more support-led during enterprise-style setup. The workflow gave clearer places to capture DNS handoff, escalation, and managed DNS ownership, which helped when separating Microsoft 365 administration, marketing sender ownership, and the parked domain enforcement decision.
Suitability
SMB fit vs enterprise fit
DMARCly fits lean operators. LetsDMARC fits larger ownership models.
DMARCly is the cleaner fit when one team owns DNS and wants a priced DMARC reporting tool with usable SPF controls. LetsDMARC is the stronger fit when domain grouping, recurring reporting, tenant separation, and handoff notes matter across enterprise or MSP work. MSP buyers should test alert quality and account separation with real client-like domains before committing.
DMARCly
0/5
Best for lean teams
Domain groups cover basics
Handoff needs outside notes
LetsDMARC
4.5/5
Better MSP account separation
Recurring reports fit clients
Enterprise ownership model
DMARCly worked best when we treated the three domains as one operator-owned portfolio. Domain groups helped, exports were usable, and recurring reporting was enough for a small internal stakeholder review, but client handoff notes and separated ownership required extra process outside the product.
LetsDMARC was better suited to larger teams and MSP-style operation. Parent and child tenant behavior, domain movement, managed DNS concepts, and recurring reporting fit the way we would separate a corporate domain, a marketing subdomain, and a parked domain across different operational owners.
What each tool feels like after 90 days of real use
DMARCly
A practical reporting tool for teams that own their own fixes
After 90 days, DMARCly felt like a focused reporting product with clear plan boundaries. The three test domains were easy to add, Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace traffic appeared quickly, and SendGrid plus Mailchimp were visible enough to build an approved sender list without waiting on support.
The weaker moments came when the work moved from visibility into ownership. The support desk sender needed manual classification, the forwarded mail SPF failure needed explanation outside the product, and policy movement required us to write our own handoff notes before quarantine.
Where it wins
Transparent public pricing
Fast domain setup
Useful vendor identification
Safe SPF path on paid tiers
Where it lags
No public G2 review base
Hosted DMARC not supported
Manual ownership notes
Limited MSP workflow depth
Pricing
From $17.99 / month
Free tier
14 day free trial
Onboarding
Fast
G2 rating
0 / 5
LetsDMARC
A broader enterprise option for managed DNS and ownership handoff
After 90 days, LetsDMARC felt more like an operating workspace than a simple report viewer. It handled the primary domain, marketing subdomain, and parked domain with stronger grouping, and it made hosted SPF, hosted DMARC, DNS monitoring, and policy planning part of the same review.
The tradeoff was commercial clarity. The workflow worked well for enterprise and MSP-style ownership, but public pricing did not show the limits we needed for domains, message volume, retention, advanced capabilities, or overages.
Where it wins
Managed DNS workflows
Stronger tenant separation
Clearer escalation paths
Good enterprise setup fit
Where it lags
Quote path for production
Public limits unclear
More setup decisions
Small teams can overbuy
Pricing
From GBP 264 / year
Free tier
30 day free trial
Onboarding
Structured
G2 rating
4.5 / 5
Pricing
DMARCly
LetsDMARC
Suped
Small
1 domain, up to 1k emails / month.
$17.99 / month
Professional covers up to 2 domains and 100,000 compliant messages.
From GBP 264 / year
Public directories list this starting price, but included limits are not public.
$0 / month
Free plan covers 1 domain and 1,000 monthly emails.
Medium
2 domains, up to 100k emails / month.
$17.99 / month
Professional fits this usage if one administrator and 2 months of history are enough.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
Official pricing requires a request because plan limits are not posted.
Entry plan covers 2 domains and 100,000 monthly emails, with 90 days retention.
Large
10 domains, up to 1 million emails / month.
$69 / month
Business covers up to 15 domains, 1 million messages, Safe SPF for 2 domains, and blocklist monitoring.
Not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026
A quote is needed for production volume, retention, deployment, and advanced capabilities.
10 domains and 1,000,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention.
Enterprise
Over 20 domains and 1 million emails / month.
$199 / month
Enterprise covers up to 200 domains and 5 million messages before published overages.
Custom
Official pricing depends on deployment, licensed message quota, and MSP or enterprise scope.
20 domains and 2,500,000 monthly emails, with 365 days retention. Unlimited domains/emails negotiable.
DMARCly prices are public monthly list prices checked from the provided pricing data. LetsDMARC uses GBP 264 / year as the public directory starting estimate, while medium, large, and enterprise limits are not publicly listed as of May 15, 2026. Exact LetsDMARC production pricing requires a quote, and public sources do not show domain, volume, retention, or overage bands.
If you cannot decide between the two, maybe the answer is Suped
Suped
Get started
Fewer manual sender decisions
DMARCly identified the major platforms in our test, but the support desk sender still needed manual classification. Suped is built to turn unknown sender findings into owner, risk, and fix steps faster.
Clearer buying path
LetsDMARC handled enterprise workflows well, but public pricing did not show the limits for domains, volume, retention, and advanced capabilities. Suped publishes starter pricing so teams can budget small and medium rollouts earlier.
Operational alerts with context
Both products surfaced useful events, but alert routing and issue explanation mattered most when the forwarded SPF failure and spoof sample arrived. Suped focuses alerts on what changed, who owns it, and what action should happen next.
The difference was significant. We moved from limited visibility to a much clearer dashboard. Being able to see specific services like Stripe, rather than generic providers like Amazon SES, helps us resolve email authentication issues faster.
Markus Hugenschmidt, Managing Director, Jam Cyber
Migrating from DMARCly or LetsDMARC?
We have done the migration enough times to know the shape.
Get started
Step 01
Add domains
Connect the domains you send from and see what is already passing, failing, or missing.
Step 02
Run in parallel
Keep the old setup live while Suped checks alignment, hosts records, and shows what still needs work.
Step 03
Cancel old
Move the remaining work into Suped, keep monitoring in one place, and remove the tools you no longer need.
Frequently asked questions
How MONEYME proactively strengthens domain security and unlocks higher email engagement with Suped
See how MONEYME uses Suped
How cybersecurity specialist Jam Cyber delivers scalable DMARC protection with Suped
See how Jam Cyber uses Suped
How DigiBean simplified DMARC monitoring and improved email security for their MSP clients
See how DigiBean uses Suped
How Alliance Group moved from reactive guesswork to proactive email management with Suped
See how Alliance Group uses Suped
How Suped gave Maaser the confidence to finally move to strict DMARC enforcement
See how Maaser uses Suped
