Suped

DMARCly vs DMARC 25

Choose DMARCly for comprehensive features and transparent pricing, or DMARC 25 for local Japanese support.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly presents a robust and feature-rich platform, clearly designed for organizations that demand comprehensive email security. It excels in delivering detailed DMARC aggregate and forensic reports, allowing us to pinpoint the exact sources of email traffic, both legitimate and malicious. The automatic subdomain detection is a neat touch, ensuring no corner of our email ecosystem goes unmonitored.
Beyond the core DMARC functionalities, DMARCly integrates essential tools like SPF flattening, BIMI support, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT monitoring. Its advanced features extend to domain blacklist (blocklist) monitoring, which is crucial for proactive reputation management, and even a DNS timeline for historical record analysis. For those managing multiple brands or clients, the concept of domain groups provides a structured approach to organization.
DMARC 25 focuses on the fundamental aspects of DMARC reporting, providing a clear pathway for organizations to gain visibility into their email authentication. We found it capable of processing aggregate reports and offering insights into email sources, helping us understand compliance rates. Its primary strength lies in its straightforward approach to DMARC, making it accessible for users who need a clean, no-frills solution.
While DMARC 25 delivers the core DMARC reporting, it appears to concentrate on these essentials without venturing into the more advanced security protocols or supplementary features offered by competitors. The platform emphasizes ease of use for its core function, aiming to simplify the process of DMARC implementation and monitoring for its target audience. It handles the basics well, but those seeking deeper integrations or advanced security layers might find it less extensive.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers a clean and intuitive user interface that makes navigating through complex DMARC data surprisingly manageable. We appreciated how easily we could drill down into aggregate reports, filtering by sending source or compliance status. The dashboards provide a high-level overview, while the detailed reports allow for granular analysis. It manages to present a lot of information without feeling overwhelming, a commendable feat for a tool with such extensive features.
Setting up domains and configuring reports within DMARCly was straightforward, guided by clear instructions. The automatic subdomain detection feature simplifies the initial setup, reducing the manual effort required. While the sheer number of features might present a slight learning curve for novices, the logical layout and helpful tooltips ensure that users can quickly become proficient in managing their DMARC policies.
DMARC 25 provides a user experience that prioritizes simplicity and directness, particularly catering to users who may be new to DMARC or prefer a less cluttered interface. We found the platform's focus on essential DMARC reports means that getting started and understanding the core data is quite quick. The interface is clean, making it easy to see the DMARC compliance status without being distracted by a multitude of advanced options.
For users seeking rapid deployment and immediate insight into basic DMARC performance, DMARC 25 delivers effectively. The setup process is streamlined, and the dashboard clearly indicates what's working and what's not. However, this simplicity can also mean that advanced users looking for deep customization, complex filtering, or integration with other security tools might find the options somewhat limited compared to more feature-rich platforms.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers a tiered support structure that scales with its pricing plans. For professional users, email support is the primary channel, which we found responsive for general inquiries. As we moved up to the Growth and Business plans, live chat support became available, providing quicker resolutions for more immediate concerns. This live chat was particularly helpful for navigating some of the more advanced features.
For enterprise clients, DMARCly provides a comprehensive support experience, which includes dedicated assistance and API access, allowing for more tailored solutions. While we appreciate the different levels of support, users on lower tiers should be aware that instant access to support may be limited. However, their documentation is generally thorough, addressing many common questions before needing to reach out.
DMARC 25 emphasizes direct contact for support inquiries, particularly through phone and a web contact form. Their stated reception hours, specifically 9:00-18:00 JST, excluding weekends and holidays, indicate a strong focus on local Japanese business hours. This suggests a personalized, direct approach to customer service, which can be highly beneficial for users within that region seeking dedicated assistance.
While the direct phone and web form options allow for personalized support, the lack of publicly listed tiered support or live chat options, typical of many SaaS platforms, might be a consideration for international users or those who prefer more immediate, self-service support methods. For their target audience, however, this direct approach ensures users can speak directly with a representative for their DMARC needs.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly is highly suitable for a broad spectrum of users, from growing SMBs to large enterprises and MSPs. Its tiered pricing model and scalable features make it an excellent choice for businesses that anticipate growth in their email volume and domain portfolio. The inclusion of multi-user access, domain groups, and API access on higher tiers caters directly to the needs of MSPs (managed service providers) managing multiple clients.
For enterprise-level organizations, DMARCly's extensive feature set, including advanced DMARC tools, blocklist monitoring, and comprehensive reporting, provides the depth required for complex email environments. SMBs will also find value in its professional and growth plans, which offer a solid foundation for DMARC implementation without an overly steep learning curve, especially with features like Safe SPF simplifying record management.
DMARC 25 appears best suited for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs), particularly those operating within Japan, given its localized support structure. Its straightforward approach to DMARC reporting means it's a good fit for organizations that primarily need to achieve DMARC compliance and gain basic visibility into their email authentication without requiring extensive advanced features. It’s also suitable for those who value direct, regional customer service.
While DMARC 25 fulfills the essential DMARC reporting requirements, its current public offering and support structure might not fully meet the complex demands of large enterprises or MSPs (managed service providers) looking for multi-tenancy, API access, or a global support footprint. Its focus on simplicity and core functionality makes it an accessible entry point for organizations beginning their DMARC journey, especially if they are looking for a focused, user-friendly tool.

How does DMARCly compare with DMARC 25?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

When considering drawbacks, DMARCly's tiered support means lower plans rely on email, which can be slower. Its feature-rich nature, while a strength, might also present a steeper learning curve for complete DMARC novices. DMARC 25, conversely, is quite light on advanced features and transparent pricing, meaning organizations with complex needs or those outside of Japan might find it less flexible or harder to budget for without direct contact.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCly provides clear, tiered pricing that scales with email volume and domain count, whereas DMARC 25 offers a free trial but requires direct contact for all paid plan costs, which can complicate budgeting.
Logo
Logo
Small
$17.99/month (covers up to 100k)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$17.99/month
Contact for pricing
Large
$69/month
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
$199/month (up to 5M, then $8/1M)
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCly or DMARC 25?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCly vs DMARC 25 DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped