Suped

DMARCly vs Centera DMARC Compliance

Choose DMARCly for comprehensive features and transparent pricing, or Centera DMARC Compliance for a focused DMARC approach.
LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
Compare product functionality

Feature set

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers a robust suite of DMARC reporting and management features, including detailed aggregate and forensic reports. We found its automatic subdomain detection particularly useful, alongside its comprehensive email vendor identification. The platform provides a clear overview of DMARC compliance, helping us quickly identify and address issues.
Beyond core DMARC, DMARCly integrates SPF flattening, BIMI support, and MTA-STS/TLS-RPT monitoring, making it a very capable tool for holistic email authentication. For organizations focused on reputation, the domain blacklist (blocklist) and adaptive blacklist (blocklist) monitoring are valuable additions, especially in higher tiers.
Centera DMARC Compliance focuses primarily on DMARC reporting and enforcement. While we haven't found public details on its advanced features, it provides the essential functionalities expected from a DMARC solution: aggregate report processing, identification of sending sources, and insights into DMARC, SPF, and DKIM alignment.
Based on our experience with similar tools, Centera is likely to offer fundamental DMARC visibility. It aims to simplify the journey to DMARC enforcement, which typically involves clear data visualization and actionable steps. However, it may not extend to more advanced protocols like BIMI or MTA-STS without explicit mention.
How easy is each product to use

User experience

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly's user interface is clean and intuitive, making navigation straightforward even for those new to DMARC. The dashboards provide a good visual representation of email traffic and DMARC compliance status. Setting up domains and configuring DMARC records is a guided process, which we appreciated.
The platform's alerts and reports are well-organized, allowing us to quickly pinpoint any issues requiring attention. While it offers many features, the UI manages to present them without feeling cluttered. We found the overall experience efficient for daily monitoring and troubleshooting.
Information regarding Centera DMARC Compliance's user experience is not publicly detailed. Based on typical DMARC platforms, we anticipate a focus on a clear, perhaps minimalist, interface that prioritizes core DMARC data. The emphasis is likely on simplifying the complex DMARC process.
Without direct access, we can only infer that the platform aims for ease of use in setting up and monitoring DMARC policies. We would expect dashboards to display compliance rates, threat detection, and email sources, presented in an accessible manner for quick analysis.
Which product has the best support

Support

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly offers tiered support, starting with email support for its Professional plan and upgrading to live chat for Growth, Business, and Enterprise plans. We found their response times via live chat to be good, providing helpful and knowledgeable assistance for both technical queries and setup guidance.
The resources available, such as their knowledge base and documentation, are comprehensive. This multi-channel approach to support ensures that users can find answers efficiently, whether through self-service or direct interaction with their team.
Specific details about Centera DMARC Compliance's support options are not readily available. Many DMARC providers offer standard email or ticket-based support, and we would expect Centera to provide similar channels for user assistance. The quality of support often depends on the team's expertise and responsiveness.
For a tool focused on compliance, effective support is crucial for guiding users through DMARC implementation, troubleshooting alignment issues, and interpreting reports. We would look for clear documentation and a responsive team to ensure a smooth user journey.
Who should use each product

Suitability

LogoLogo
First comparison imageSecond comparison image
DMARCly is highly suitable for a wide range of organizations. SMBs will find its Professional and Growth plans offer excellent value with robust features. Enterprise clients benefit from unlimited users, API access, SSO, and extensive domain monitoring capabilities, making it a strong contender for large-scale deployments.
MSPs (Managed Service Providers) will appreciate the multi-domain and multi-user management, along with domain grouping features, which simplify managing DMARC for multiple clients. The tiered feature set allows businesses to scale their DMARC efforts effectively as their needs grow, from basic reporting to advanced threat detection.
Centera DMARC Compliance appears to be a good fit for organizations primarily seeking a straightforward path to DMARC enforcement. Without detailed feature or pricing information, it is harder to pinpoint specific suitability. We'd expect it to appeal to SMBs and mid-market companies that need reliable DMARC reporting without an overwhelming array of advanced features.
For enterprise-level organizations or MSPs requiring extensive multi-tenancy, API integrations, or comprehensive ancillary email authentication features, Centera's public information does not explicitly highlight these capabilities. It likely serves those who prioritize core DMARC visibility and compliance over an exhaustive feature set.

How does DMARCly compare with Centera DMARC Compliance?

Logo
Logo
DMARC report analysis
Source detection
Forward detection
Spoof detection
Notifications and alerts
Reporting
API
Multi-tenancy
SPF flattening
Hosted DMARC
BIMI
MTA-STS/TLS-RPT
Blocklists and reputation
AI copilot
DNS monitoring
Self hostable
Free trial/free tier

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCly's main drawback can be its pricing structure, where exceeding email volume or domain quotas leads to automatic upgrades or additional charges. Centera DMARC Compliance, lacking public pricing and detailed feature information, presents a challenge in understanding its full capabilities and potential limitations upfront.
We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.
Logo
Logo

Pricing

DMARCly offers transparent, tiered pricing based on email volume and domain count, whereas Centera DMARC Compliance requires direct contact for any pricing information.
Logo
Logo
Small
$17.99 (up to 100k messages)
Contact for pricing
Medium
$17.99 (up to 100k messages)
Contact for pricing
Large
$69 (up to 1M messages)
Contact for pricing
Enterprise
$199 (up to 5M messages) + $8 per 1M over quota
Contact for pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCly or Centera DMARC Compliance?
Logo
Logo
Suped double trouble

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services
DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix
Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly
Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail
Get started - free

Frequently asked questions

    DMARCly vs Centera DMARC Compliance DMARC product review - Compare DMARC products - Suped