Is DMARCEye truly AI-powered, and what does that mean for me?

Yes, DMARCEye utilizes AI for its DMARC report analysis. This means the platform automatically processes and interprets complex aggregate reports, highlights key issues, and suggests actionable steps. For us, it translated to faster problem identification and less time spent manually sifting through data, making DMARC management more efficient.

What technical skills are needed to set up Docker DMARC Reports?

To set up Docker DMARC Reports, you'll need a solid understanding of Docker, including running containers and managing volumes. Additionally, familiarity with IMAP for fetching reports and configuring a MySQL or PostgreSQL database for data storage is essential. Basic Linux server administration skills for hosting the Docker environment are also beneficial.

Can Docker DMARC Reports provide automated alerts?

No, Docker DMARC Reports does not include built-in automated alerts or notifications. While it processes and visualizes your DMARC data, if you require proactive alerts for policy changes, spoofing attempts, or authentication failures, you would need to develop and integrate your own custom alerting solutions on top of the open-source platform.

Does DMARCEye offer a free version, or just a trial?

DMARCEye provides a 30-day free trial across all its paid plans, allowing you to test its full capabilities. However, it does not offer a perpetually free tier. Once the trial period concludes, you need to subscribe to a paid plan to continue using the service.

Which solution is better for managing multiple client domains as an MSP?

For an MSP managing multiple client domains, DMARCEye's Scale and Enterprise plans are far more suitable. The Scale plan, with its per-domain pricing and features like inviting other users and multiple accounts, is designed for this scenario. Docker DMARC Reports, being a single-instance self-hosted solution, would require significant manual effort to manage separate instances for each client, lacking native multi-tenancy features.

Compare product functionality

Feature set

DMARCEye provides a comprehensive, managed DMARC reporting and analysis platform. We found its AI-powered DMARC report analysis particularly effective in simplifying complex data, allowing us to quickly identify potential threats and configuration issues. It's built for ease of use, aiming to make DMARC accessible even for those without deep technical knowledge.

Beyond basic reporting, DMARCEye includes smart alerts and integrations with popular communication platforms like Slack and Teams, ensuring we were always informed of critical changes or issues. While it covers core DMARC functionalities, it does not venture into broader email security aspects such as BIMI or MTA-STS configuration, focusing purely on DMARC insights.

Docker DMARC Reports, as an open-source, self-hosted solution, offers fundamental DMARC report parsing and viewing. It leverages existing open-source tools to process aggregate reports and present them in a web interface. Its core strength lies in providing direct access to your DMARC data without relying on a third-party service.

We observed that while it provides the raw data necessary for DMARC enforcement, it lacks advanced features like automated alerts, AI-driven insights, or multi-user access that are common in managed solutions. Functionality is primarily limited to report aggregation and visualization, leaving extended capabilities for user implementation.

How easy is each product to use

User experience

From our experience, DMARCEye shines in its user-friendly interface. Setting up new domains and understanding the DMARC reports was straightforward, even for team members less familiar with email protocols. The dashboards are intuitive, providing clear visualisations of authentication trends, failure rates, and potential spoofing attempts.

The platform's design focuses on guiding us through the DMARC implementation process. It clearly identifies sources, highlights authentication issues, and offers actionable recommendations. This approach significantly reduces the learning curve and time spent on manual analysis.

Docker DMARC Reports presents a very different user experience. As a self-hosted Docker solution, the initial setup requires significant technical expertise in Docker, IMAP, and database management. We had to configure DNS records, an IMAP mailbox, a MySQL or PostgreSQL database, and the Docker container itself.

Once configured, the web interface is functional but basic, focusing on raw data presentation. It provides the necessary charts and tables for DMARC analysis but lacks the polished design, AI-driven insights, and guided workflows of commercial tools. It's a tool built for those comfortable under the hood, not necessarily for quick, high-level overviews.

Which product has the best support

Support

DMARCEye offers a structured support model. All plans include community support, while Scale and Enterprise plans benefit from priority support. Enterprise users gain access to 24/7 phone support, an SLA guarantee, and a dedicated account manager. This tiered approach means that higher-tier customers receive more robust, direct assistance.

Our interactions showed that the support team is responsive and knowledgeable, helping us navigate DMARC complexities. The availability of email notifications and integrations for alerts also acts as a proactive support mechanism, reducing the need for direct contact.

Docker DMARC Reports, being an open-source project, relies primarily on community support. This means help is available through GitHub issues, forums, and potentially other open-source channels, but there is no formal support contract, dedicated team, or guaranteed response times. We found that solutions often involve searching existing issues or contributing to the project ourselves.

While community support can be incredibly valuable for specific technical questions, it's not a substitute for the dedicated support, SLAs, or account management offered by commercial solutions. Users must be comfortable with a do-it-yourself approach to troubleshooting and maintenance.

Who should use each product

Suitability

DMARCEye is well-suited for a range of organizations, from small businesses to large enterprises and Managed Service Providers (MSPs). Its Basic plan is ideal for individuals or SMBs with a single domain needing core DMARC monitoring. The Scale plan, with its per-domain pricing and multi-account features, is very attractive for MSPs managing multiple client domains.

For large enterprises with 50+ domains and advanced requirements like unlimited data history and dedicated support, the Enterprise plan offers a tailored solution. Its ease of use and AI-powered insights make it a strong contender for teams that prioritize efficiency and streamlined DMARC management over deep technical customization.

Docker DMARC Reports is best for technically proficient individuals, small development teams, or organizations with internal DevOps expertise that prefer self-hosting and full control over their data. It's an excellent choice for those with a limited budget who are willing to invest time and technical resources into setup and maintenance.

It is less suitable for MSPs looking for scalable, multi-tenant solutions or large enterprises that require formal support, advanced reporting, and a minimal operational overhead. SMBs without dedicated IT resources might find the setup and maintenance daunting, as it requires comfort with command-line tools and server management.

How does DMARCEye compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

DMARC report analysis

Processes and visualizes aggregate DMARC reports.

AI-powered analysis

Basic parsing and viewing

Source detection

Identifies sending sources based on DMARC data.

Raw data available

Forward detection

Identifies emails forwarded by third parties.

Raw data available

Spoof detection

Helps identify malicious email spoofing attempts.

Raw data available

Notifications and alerts

Automated alerts for DMARC policy changes or issues.

Smart alerts, email, Slack, Teams

Requires custom setup

Reporting

Provides dashboards and detailed reports.

Comprehensive dashboards

Basic web viewer

API

Programmatic access to DMARC data.

Enterprise plan only

Not built-in

Multi-tenancy

Supports managing multiple distinct accounts or domains.

Multiple accounts on Scale/Enterprise

Designed for single instance

SPF flattening

Helps manage SPF record limits.

Hosted DMARC

Managed DMARC record and reporting service.

Managed cloud service

Self-hosted solution

BIMI

Support for Brand Indicators for Message Identification.

MTA-STS/TLS-RPT

Monitors and reports on MTA-STS and TLS-RPT.

Blocklists and reputation

Monitors sender IP reputation or blocklist status.

AI copilot

Uses AI to assist with DMARC insights and actions.

AI-powered monitoring

DNS monitoring

Monitors other critical DNS records.

Self hostable

Can be installed and run on your own infrastructure.

Cloud-based

Docker container

Free trial/free tier

Offers a free period or a perpetually free plan.

30-day free trial

Open-source, free

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

DMARCEye is generally a robust platform, though some users might find its terminology for DMARC errors to be dense, which is less a fault of the platform and more a reflection of DMARC's inherent complexity. The primary drawback we observed is the lack of a perpetual free tier, offering only a 30-day trial for its paid plans. Docker DMARC Reports, on the other hand, demands significant technical expertise for setup and ongoing maintenance. Its open-source nature means no formal support, and advanced features like alerts are absent, requiring users to build these themselves. This makes it challenging for those without dedicated technical resources.

We have pulled the average ratings from G2 for each product, and also included the most recent negative reviews for each product in full. Positive reviews tend to have less detail and have a higher chance of being fraudulent, so negative reviews are a better signal for your decision.

4.5 / 5(1)

0 / 5(0)

A seamless DMARC monitoring experience

4.5 / 5

What do you like best about DmarcEye? Ease of Use: DMARCeye is engineered with the end-user in mind, making it an ideal choice for those who are not necessarily tech-savvy. What do you dislike about DmarcEye? Sometimes it might be hard to understand DMARC errors, but I guess this is more of a DMARC problem itself. What problems is DmarcEye solving and how is that benefiting you? DMARCeye makes it easy to monitor and understand DMARC reports.

Jan P.

Programmer Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

No G2 reviews

G2 is the most popular review platform for DMARC products, so this is a strong signal that this product is not popular.

Pricing

DMARCEye offers predictable tiered pricing with a discount for annual billing, while Docker DMARC Reports is entirely free but requires significant self-management.

Small

Up to 10k emails / month

Basic: $7.50 / month (1 domain)

Free (self-hosted)

Medium

Up to 100k emails / month

Scale: $6.00 / domain / month

Free (self-hosted)

Large

Up to 1 million emails / month

Scale: $6.00 / domain / month

Free (self-hosted)

Enterprise

Over 1 million emails / month

From $300 / month

Free (self-hosted)

Suped hard sell incoming!

Still not satisfied with DMARCEye or Docker DMARC Reports?

Try Suped

What makes Suped different

Automated sender discovery that finds shadow IT and third-party services

DMARC copilot that pinpoints failures and prescribes the exact fix

Guided path to full p=reject enforcement, safely and quickly

Proactive alerts to prevent misconfigurations before they block your mail

Get started - free

Suped

DMARCEye vs Docker DMARC Reports

Feature set

User experience

Support

Suitability

How does DMARCEye compare with Docker DMARC Reports?

Drawbacks and what to watch out for

Pricing

Suped hard sell incoming!

What makes Suped different

Frequently asked questions

Suped